This article proposes that the term διάκονος περιτομη̑ς in Rom. 15.8 refers to Christ as an ‘agent of circumcision’, not a ‘servant to the circumcision’. As such, it is part and parcel of Paul’s view that faith in Christ effects in Gentile believers an intangible, genital circumcision, enabling them to enter the Abrahamic covenant which has circumcision as a requirement.
BarclayJ.M.1998 ‘Paul and Philo on Circumcision: Romans 2.25-9 in Social and Cultural Context’, NTS44: 536-56.
2.
BarrettC.K.1991A Commentary on the Epistle to the Romans (2nd edn; London: A & C Black).
3.
BarthM.BlankeH.1994Colossians (trans. BeckAstrid B.; New York: Doubleday).
4.
BeyerH.W.1964–1976 ‘διάκονος’, in TDNT, II: 88-89.
5.
BlaschkeA.1998Beschneidung: Zeugnisse der Bibel und verwandter Texte (Texte und Arbeiten zum neutestamentlichen Zeitalter, 28; Tübingen: Francke Verlag).
6.
BorgenP.1982 ‘Paul Preaches Circumcision and Pleases Men’, in HookerMornaWilsonStephen (eds.), Paul and Paulinism: Essays in Honor of C.K. Barrett (London: SPCK): 37-46.
7.
BrownR.E.1997An Introduction to the New Testament (New York: Doubleday).
8.
BruceF.F.1982The Epistle to the Galatians (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans).
9.
CerfauxL.1954–1962 ‘Abraham ‘père en circoncision’ des Gentils (Rom., IV,12)’, in Recueil Lucien Cerfaux (3 vols.; Gembloux: J. Duculot), II: 333-38.
10.
CohenS.J.D.2005Why Aren’t Jewish Women Circumcised? (Berkeley: University of California Press).
11.
CollinsR.F.1988Letters that Paul Did not Write (Wilmington, DE: Glazier).
12.
CranfieldC.E.B.1975A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Epistle to the Romans (2 vols.; Edinburgh: T&T Clark).
13.
DasA.2007Solving the Romans Debate (Minneapolis: Fortress Press).
14.
DunnJ.D.G.1988Romans (2 vols.; Dallas: Word).
15.
DunnJ.D.G.1996The Epistles to the Colossians and to Philemon (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans).
16.
ElliottN.1990The Rhetoric of Romans: Argumentative Constraint and Strategy and Paul’s Dialogue with Judaism (JSNTSup, 45; Sheffield: JSOT Press).
17.
FitzmyerJ.1993Romans (New York: Doubleday).
18.
GäckleV.2004Die Starken und die Schwachen in Korinth und Rom (WUNT 2/200; Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck).
19.
GagnonR.A.J.2000 ‘Why the ‘Weak’ at Rome Cannot Be Non-Christian Jews’, CBQ62: 64-82.
20.
GastonL.1987Paul and the Torah (Vancouver: University of British Columbia).
21.
HaackerK.1999Der Brief des Paulus an die Römer (ThNT, 6; Leipzig: Evangelische Verlagsanstalt).
22.
HansenG.W.2009The Letter to the Philippians (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans).
23.
HawthorneG.F.MartinR.P.2004Philippians (WBC; Nashville: Thomas Nelson).
24.
HoffmanL.A.1996Covenant of Blood: Circumcision and Gender in Rabbinic Judaism (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).
25.
JewettR.2007Romans (Minneapolis: Fortress Press).
26.
KarrisR.1991 ‘Romans 14.1-15.13 and the Occasion of Romans’, in DonfriedKarl (ed.), The Romans Debate (2nd edn; Peabody, MA: Hendrickson): 65-84.
27.
KäsemannE.1974An Die Römer (HNT; Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr [Paul Siebeck]).
28.
LeppäO.2003The Making of Colossians (Helsinki: Finnish Exegetical Society; Gottingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht).
29.
LohseE.1971Colossians and Philemon (trans. PoehlmannWilliam R.KarrisRobert J.; Philadelphia: Fortress Press).
30.
LohseE.2003Der Brief an die Römer (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht).
31.
MarcusJ.1989 ‘The Circumcision and the Uncircumcision in Rome’, NTS35: 67-81.
32.
MarkE.W. (ed.) 2003The Covenant of Circumcision: New Perspectives on an Ancient Jewish Rite (Hanover, NH: Brandeis University Press/University Press of New England).
33.
MartynL.1997Galatians (New York: Doubleday).
34.
MeeksW.A.1987 ‘Judgment and the Brother: Romans 14.1-15.13’, in HawthorneGerald F.BetzOtto (eds.), Tradition and Interpretation in the New Testament (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans): 293-300.
35.
MüllerM.1997Vom Schluß zum Ganzen (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht).
36.
NanosM.D.1996The Mystery of Romans (Minneapolis: Fortress Press).
O’BrienP.T.1991The Epistle to the Philippians: A Commentary on the Greek Text (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans).
39.
RauerM.1923Die ‘Schwachen’ in Korinth und Rom nach den Paulusbriefen (Frieburg im Breisgau: Herder).
40.
ReasonerM.1999The Strong and the Weak: Romans 14.1–15.13 in Context (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
41.
SampleyJ.P.1995 ‘The Weak and the Strong: Paul’s Careful and Crafty Rhetorical Strategy in Romans 14.1–15.13’, in Michael WhiteL.Larry YarbroughO. (eds.), The Social World of the First Christians: Essays in Honor of Wayne Meeks (Minneapolis: Fortress Press): 40-52.
42.
SchallerB.2006 “‘Christus, der Diener der Beschneidung…, auf ihn werden die Völker hoffen.” Zu Charakter und Funktion der Schriftzitate in Röm 15,7-13’, in SängerDieterKonradtMatthias (eds.), Das Gesetz im frühen Judentum und im Neuen Testament: Festschrift für Christoph Burchard zum 75. Geburtstag (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht; Friborg: Academic Press): 261-85.
43.
SchmidtH.W.1963Der Brief des Paulus an die Römer (ThHk, 6; Berlin: Evangelische Verlagsanstalt).
44.
SchweizerE.1982The Letter to the Colossians (trans. ChesterAndrew; Minneapolis: Augsburg).
45.
StandhartingerA.2004 ‘Colossians and the Pauline School’, NTS50: 572-93.
46.
StowersS.K.1994A Rereading of Romans: Justice, Jews, and Gentiles (New Haven: Yale University Press).
47.
SwetnamJ.1980 ‘The Curious Crux at Romans 4,12’, Bib61: 110-15.
48.
TheissenM.2010 ‘Genealogy, Circumcision, and Conversion in Early Judaism and Christianity’ (PhD dissertation, Duke University).
49.
ThurstonB.B.RyanJ.M.2005Philippians and Philemon (Sacra Pagina; Collegeville, MN: Liturgical Press).
50.
VincentM.1961 [1897]A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Epistles to the Philippians and to Philemon (ICC; Edinburgh: T&T Clark).
51.
WagnerJ. R.1997 ‘The Christ, Servant of Jew and Gentile: A Fresh Approach to Romans 15:8-9’, JBL116: 473-84.
52.
WilckensU.1982Der Brief an die Römer (EKKNT, 6; Zurich: Benzinger Verlag).
53.
WilsonR.McL.2005A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on Colossians and Philemon (ICC; London: T&T Clark).
54.
WilliamsS.K.1980 ‘The ‘Righteousness of God’ in Romans’, JBL99.2: 241-90.
