The recent attempt by G. Aichele, P. Miscall and R. Walsh to generate a debate between historical criticism and postmodern interpretation using the language of comparative mythologies has so far fallen flat. Here it is suggested that a more fruitful way forward would be to re-label historical-critical methodologies with the terminology of reception history. This would build on the presence of audiences—whether real or constructed—within those methodologies while undermining the use of terms like ‘first-stage/secondstage’ to keep them at the centre of biblical interpretation and encouraging historical critics to venture into the history of interpretation. This broadening of the discipline should also help limit the impact of the current financial climate on what otherwise appears to be a very narrow and heavily over-subscribed area of the humanities.
Aichele, G., P. Miscall and R. Walsh 2009 ‘An Elephant in the Room: Historical-Critical and Postmodern Interpretations of the Bible’, JBL128: 383-404.
2.
Avalos, H.2007The End of Biblical Studies (New York : Prometheus).
3.
Balch, D.1991Social History of the Matthean Community: Cross-Disciplinary Approaches (Minneapolis, MN: Augsburg Fortress Publishers).
4.
Barton, J.2007The Nature of Biblical Criticism (Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox).
5.
Barton, J., and J. Muddiman (eds.) 2001Oxford Bible Commentary ( Oxford: Oxford University Press).
6.
Bauckham, R.2006Jesus and the Eyewitnesses: The Gospels as Eyewitness Testimony (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans).
7.
Bauckham, R. (ed.) 1998The Gospel for All Christians: Rethinking their Audiences (Edinburgh : T&T Clark).
8.
Boer, R.2009Http://stalinsmoustache.wordpress.com/2009/12/23/reflections-on-the-so-called-postmodern-historical-debate/ (accessed 30 March 2010).
9.
Collins, J.J.2005The Bible after Babel: Historical Criticism in a Postmodern Age ( Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans).
10.
Das , A.A.2007Solving the Romans Debate (Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press).
11.
DeConick, A.D.2009Http://forbiddengospels.blogspot.com/2009/12/historical-criticism-again.html (accessed 30 March 2010).
12.
Donfried, K.P.1991The Romans Debate (rev. and expanded edn;Edinburgh: T&T Clark).
13.
Dunn, J.D.G.2006The Parting of the Ways: Between Christianity and Judaism and its Significance for the Character of Christianity (2nd edn; London: SCM Press).
14.
Ehrensperger, K., and R.W. Holder (eds.) 2008Reformation Readings of Romans (London : T&T Clark International).
15.
Esler, P.F.1987Community and Gospel in Luke-Acts ( Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
16.
Galbraith, D.2009Http://dunedinschool.wordpress.com/2009/12/21/historical-critics-and-post-mods/ (accessed 30 March 2010).
17.
Gamble, H.1977The Textual History of the Letter to the Romans ( Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans).
18.
Han, K.S.2002Jerusalem and the Early Jesus Movement: The Q Community’s Attitude Towards the Temple (Sheffield: Continuum).
19.
Hartmann, M.2001Der Tod Johannes’ des Täufers: Eine exegetische und rezeptionsgeschichtliche Studie auf dem Hintergrund narrativer, intertextueller und kulturanthropologischer Zugänge (Stuttgart: Verlag Katholisches Bibelwerk).
20.
Horrell, D.G.20071 Peter (London: T&T Clark International).
21.
Klink, E. (ed.) 2008The Audience of the Gospels: The Origin and Function of the Gospels in Early Christianity (London: T&T Clark International ).
22.
Lieb, M. et al. (eds.) 2010Oxford Handbook of the Reception History of the Bible ( Oxford: Oxford University Press).
23.
Lindemann, A. (ed.) 2001The Sayings Source Q and the Historical Jesus (Louvain: Peeters Publishers).
24.
Loader, W.2007The New Testament with Imagination: A Fresh Approach to its Writings and Themes (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans); Blurb: Http://www.christianbook.com/ Christian/Books/product?item_no=827461&event=ECF (accessed 18 May 2010).
25.
Lyons, W.J., and J. kland (eds.) 2009The Way the World Ends? The Apocalypse of John in Culture and Ideology (Sheffield: Sheffield Phoenix Press).
26.
Martin, D.B.2008Pedagogy of the Bible: An Analysis and Proposal (Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox).
27.
Martyn, J.L.1968History and Theology in the Fourth Gospel (New York: Harper&Row).
28.
Newport, K.G.C.2009 ‘Be thou faithful unto death (cf. Rev 2.10): The Book of Revelation, the Branch Davidians and Apocalyptic (self-)Destruction ’, in Lyons and kland2009: 211-26.
29.
Olsson, B.2009 ‘Review of A. Grabner-Haider, ed., Kulturgeschichte der Bibel (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2007)’, http://www.bookreviews.org/bookdetail.asp?TitleId=6762&CodePage=6762 (accessed 12 February 2010 ).
30.
Parris, D.P.2008Reception Theory and Biblical Hermeneutics ( Eugene, OR: Pickwick Publications).
31.
Roberts, J., and C. Rowland2008The Bible for Sinners: Interpretation in the Present Time (London: SPCK).
32.
Sanders, E.P.1977Paul and Palestinian Judaism: A Comparison of Patterns of Religion (London: SCM Press).
33.
Sawyer J.F.A. (ed.) 2009A Concise Dictionary of the Bible and its Reception (Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox).
34.
Schildgen, B.D.1999Power and Prejudice: The Reception of the Gospel of Mark (Detroit: Wayne State University Press).
35.
Schließer, B.2007Abraham’s Faith in Romans 4: Paul’s Concept of Faith in Light of the History of Reception of Genesis 15:6 (Tübingen : Mohr Siebeck).
36.
Snodgrass, K.2008Stories with Intent: A Comprehensive Guide to the Parables of Jesus (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans ).
37.
Stendahl, K.1962‘Biblical Theology, Contemporary’, in G.A. Buttrick (ed.), Interpreter’s Dictionary of the Bible, I (Nashville: Abingdon Press): 418-32.
38.
Streete, G.P.C.1999‘Redaction Criticism’, in S.R. Haynes and S.L. McKenzie (eds.), To Each its Own Meaning: Introduction to Biblical Criticisms and their Application (2nd rev. edn; Westminster John Knox): 105-21.
39.
Tabor, J.D.1995‘The Role of Biblical Scholarship at Waco: One Attempt to Avert Disaster’, http://wacocult.tripod.com/neveragain/ashes.html (accessed 24 May 2010).
40.
Valantasis, R.1997The Gospel of St. Thomas (London: Routledge).
41.
Van Seters, J.2009‘A Response to G. Aichele, P. Miscall, and R. Walsh, "An Elephant in the Room: Historical-Critical and Postmodern Interpretations of the Bible"’, Journal of Hebrew Scriptures9; http://www.arts.ualberta.ca/JHS/Articles/article_128.pdf (accessed 23 March 2010).
42.
Wedderburn, A.J.M.1988The Reasons for Romans (Edinburgh: T & T Clark).
