The role of chiasmus as a structuring device in ancient literature continues to be a much-debated facet of literary and rhetorical analysis, with often overly-exuberant discovery of complex chiasmi spanning whole books running far ahead of the methodological substructure needed to sustain a convincing demonstration of the same. This article analyses three recent attempts to propose a chiastic macro-structural analysis of Revelation and “nds them to present “ne examples of three recurring problems in the quest for the elusive chiasmus: (1) developing chiastic outlines by means of selective shaping of summary statements for major blocks of text; (2) discovering a chiasmus by means of selective reading of key terms; and (3) creation of a chiasmus by means of manipulation of formal markers. The article is offered in the hope that future proposals will take the methodological cautions proposed by critics of chiasmus to heart, as well as the standard rules of critical thinking (e.g., seeking for better alternative structuring devices alongside the quest for the hidden chiasmus).
Caird, G.B.1964A Commentary on the Revelation of Saint John the Divine (New York: Harper & Row).
9.
Charles, R.H.1920A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Revelation of St. John (2 volumes;Edinburgh: T&T Clark).
10.
deSilva, D.A.1995Despising Shame: Honor Discourse and Community Maintenance in the Epistle to the Hebrews (SBLDS, 152; Atlanta, GA: Scholars Press ).
11.
Duff, Paul B.2001Who Rides the Beast? Prophetic Rivalry and the Rhetoric of Crisis in the Churches of the Apocalypse (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
12.
Ford, Josephine M.1975Revelation (AB, 38; Garden City, NY: Doubleday).
13.
Gelin, A.1951 ` L'Apocalypse', in L. Pirot and A. Clamer (eds.), La Sainte Bible (12 vols.; Paris: Letouzy et Ané), XII: 581-667.
1997Die Offenbarung des Johannes (Regensburg : Verlag Friedrich Pustet).
16.
Harrington, Wilfrid1969The Apocalypse of Saint John: A Commentary (London: Geoffrey Chapman).
17.
Kennedy, G.A.1984New Testament Interpretation through Rhetorical Criticism (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press).
18.
Kraft, H.1974Die Offenbarung des Johannes (HNT, 16a;Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck).
19.
Lohmeyer, E.1970Die Offenbarung des Johannes (HNT, 16;Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck).
20.
Lohse, Eduard1960Die Offenbarung des Johannes (NTD, 11;Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht).
21.
Longenecker, Bruce W.2001 `“Linked Like a Chain”: Rev. 22.6-9 in Light of an Ancient Transition Technique', NTS47: 105-17.
22.
Lund, Nils1942Chiasmus in the New Testament (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press).
23.
Luter, A. Boyd, and Michelle Lee1995 `Philippians as Chiasmus: Key to the Structure, Unity and Theme Questions', NTS41: 89-101.
24.
Michaels, J. Ramsey1997Revelation (IVPNTC; Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press).
25.
Mounce, Robert H.1997 [1977] The Book of Revelation ( NICNT; Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans ).
26.
Müller, Ulrich B.1984Die Offenbarung des Johannes (Gütersloh : Gerd Mohn).
27.
Murphy, Frederick J.1998Fallen is Babylon: The Revelation to John ( New Testament in Context; Valley Forge, PA: Trinity Press International).
28.
Porter, Stanley E., and Jonathan T. Reed1998 `Philippians as a Macro-Chiasm and its Exegetical Signi“cance', NTS44: 213-31.
29.
Prigent, Pierre1988L'Apocalypse de Saint Jean (CNT, 14;Geneva: Labor et Fides).
30.
Resseguie, James L.1998Revelation Unsealed: A Narrative-Critical Approach to John's Apocalypse (Leiden: E.J. Brill).
31.
Roloff, Jürgen1984Die Offenbarung des Johannes (Zürich: Theologischer Verlag).
32.
Schüssler Fiorenza, Elizabeth1977 `Composition and Structure of the Book of Revelation', CBQ39: 344-66.
33.
1991Revelation: Vision of a Just World (Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press).
34.
Shea, William H.1982 `Chiasm in Theme and by Form in Revelation 18', AUSS20: 249-56.
35.
1984 `Revelation 5 and 19 as Literary Reciprocals', AUSS22: 248-57.
36.
Smalley, Stephen S.2005The Revelation to John (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press).
37.
Snyder, Barbara W.1991 `Combat Myth in the Apocalypse: The Liturgy of the Day of the Lord and the Dedication of the Heavenly Temple', unpublished PhD dissertation , Graduate Theological Union and University of California, Berkeley.
38.
Steele, R.B.1890Chiasmus in Sallust, Caesar, Tacitus, and Justinus (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press).
39.
Strand, Kenneth A.1976Interpreting the Book of Revelation ( Worthington, OH: Ann Arbor Publishers).
40.
1978 `Chiastic Structure and Some Motifs in the Book of Revelation ', AUSS16: 401-408.
41.
1982 `Two Aspects of Babylon's Judgment as Portrayed in Revelation 18', AUSS20: 53-59.
42.
Thomson, Ian H.1995Chiasmus in the Pauline Letters (JSNTSup,111; Shef“eld: Shef“eld Academic Press).
43.
Watson, D.F.2006The Rhetoric of the New Testament: A Bibliographic Survey (Blandford Forum, UK: Deo Publishing ).
44.
Welch, John W.1981Chiasmus in Antiquity: Structures, Analyses, Exegesis (Hildesheim: Gerstenberg Verlag).
45.
Witherington, Ben, III2003Revelation ( New Cambridge Bible Commentary; Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
