In the Q Document there are about twenty references that provide information about
family life. Most of them mention different types of houses that are observed from
different perspectives. By locating these references and the point of view they
presuppose in the context of the different types of families that existed in
first-century Galilee, this article will illustrate how they can help identify more
precisely the social location of the Q people.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Botha, P.1998‘Houses in the World of Jesus’
, Neot32:
37-74
.
2.
Canaan, T.1933‘The Palestinian Arab House. Its Architecture and Folklore’
, JPOS13:
1-83
.
3.
Frechskowski, M. 2001 ‘Galiläa oder Jerusalem? Die
topographischen und politischen Hintergründe der Logienquelle’,
in A. Lindemann (ed.), The Sayings Source Q and the Historical Jesus (BETL, 153;
Leuven: Leuven University Press): 535-59.
4.
2003 ‘La familia en el movimiento de Jesús’,
EstBíb 61: 65-83.
5.
Han, K.S.2002Jerusalem and the Early Jesus Movement: The Q Community’s Attitude
Toward the Temple (
Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press
).
6.
Hirschfeld, Y.1995The Palestinian Dwelling in the Roman-Byzantine Period (
Jerusalem: Franciscan Printing Press
).
7.
2000Excavating Q: The History and Setting of the Sayings Gospel (
Minneapolis: Fortress Press
).
8.
Lenski, G.E.1966Power and Privilege: A Theory of Social Stratification (
New York: McGraw-Hill
).
9.
McCane, B.2003Roll Back the Stone: Death and Burial in the World of Jesus (
Valley Forge, PA: Trinity Press
).
10.
Moreland, M.2001‘Q and the Economics of Early Roman Galilee’,
in
A. Lindemann
(ed.), The Sayings Source Q and the Historical Jesus (BETL, 153;
Leuven: Leuven University Press
): 561-575.
11.
Oakman, D.E.1988‘Rulers’ Houses, Thieves, and Usurpers. The Beelzebul Pericope’
, Forum4:
109-123
.
12.
Osiek, C.
, and
Balch, D.1997Families in the New Testament World. Households and House Churches (
Lousville, KY: Westminster/John Knox
).
13.
1996‘The Language of Violence and the Aphoristic Sayings in Q. A Study
of Q 6.27-36’, in
J. Kloppenborg
(ed.), Conflict and Invention: Literary, Rhetorical and Social Studies
on the Saying Gospel Q (
Valley Forge, PA: Trinity Press
): 53-72.
14.
Reed, J.L.1996‘The Social Map of Q’, in
J. Kloppenborg
(ed.), Conflict and Invention: Literary, Rhetorical and Social Studies
on the Saying Gospel Q (
Valley Forge, PA: Trinity Press
): 17-36.
15.
Richardson, P.2000‘First-Century Houses in Q’s
Setting’, in
D.G. Horrell
and
C.M. Tuckett
(eds.), Christology, Controversy and Community: New Testament Essays in
Honour of David R. Catchpole (NovTSup, 99;
Leiden: E.J. Brill
): 63-83.
16.
Robinson, J.M. 1999 ‘From Safe House to House Church: From Q to
Matthew’, in M. Becker and W. Fenske (eds.), Das Ende der Tage und die
Gegenwart des Heils: Begegnungen mit dem Neuen Testament und seiner Umwelt.
Festschrift für Heinz-Wolfgang Kuhn zum 65. Geburtstag (AGJU, 44; Leiden:
E.J. Brill): 183-99.
17.
Robinson, J.M.et al.
(eds.) 2000The Critical Edition of Q: Synopsis including the Gospels of Matthew and Luke,
Mark and Thomas with English, German, and French Translations of Q and
Thomas (
Minneapolis: Fortress Press
).
18.
Stager, L.E.1985‘The Archaeology of the Family in Ancient Israel’
, BASOR260:
1-35
.
19.
Zeller, D.1982‘Redaktionsprozesse und wechselnder “Sitz im
Leben” beim Q-Material’, in
J. Delobel
,
T. Baardaet al.
(eds.), Logia: Les paroles de Jésus—The Sayings of
Jesus: Memorial Joseph Coppens (BETL, 55;
Leuven: Peters
): 359-409.
