Queer theorists have considered the problems concerning the political strategy of using LGBT rights to justify racist xenophobia and using homo/transphobia to consolidate heterosexist nationalism. Their timely interventions are important in exposing state violence in the name of human rights and sovereign equality, but they have offered no alternative. They may also have reinforced the assumption of state science. This assumption is based on a trinity structure of the nation-state-sovereignty of ‘modern, self-determining men’, who are against each other and thereby co-built the so-called ‘international’. State-centric internationalism produces exclusionary effects that undermine the rights of sexual and gender minorities. To address this, I first consider the debate over ‘LGBT rights as human rights’, and identify two types of cultural relativism (epistemological and political) as the categories to formulate a decolonial response to the debate. In this article, queer political theorising is pushed forward to: 1) critically evaluate universalism, 2) differentiate cultural relativism (opposing the political version of it) and 3) revise the epistemological version with decolonial-queer praxis. I propose a pluralist approach to sovereignty and human rights; informed by this approach, the lack of international consensus is remedied by recognising the polyvocality within transnational queer activism beyond the monopoly of states’ representation of their own peoples. This proposal also aims to decentre modern statecraft from the political imagination of contemporary international studies scholarship.
AdamczykA., 2017. Cross-National Public Opinion About Homosexuality: Examining Attitudes Across the Globe. Berkeley: University of California Press.
2.
AgathangelouA.M., 2013. Neoliberal geopolitical order and value: queerness as a speculative economy and anti-blackness as terror. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 15(4), pp. 453–476.
3.
AnzaldúaG.E., 1987. Borderlands/La Frontera: The New Mestiza. San Francisco: Aunt Lute Books.
BalibarE., 1990. The nation form: history and ideology. Review (Fernand Braudel Center), 13(3), pp. 329–361.
7.
BalibarE., 2009. Violence and civility: on the limits of political anthropology. differences, 20(2/3), pp. 9–35.
8.
BaoH., 2018. Queer Comrades: Gay Identity and Tongzhi Activism in Postsocialist China. Copenhagen: NIAS Press.
9.
BegerN.J., 2004. Tensions in the Struggle for Sexual Minority Rights in Europe: Que(e)rying Political Practices. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
CharlesworthH., 2005. Feminist ambivalence about international law. International Legal Theory, 11(1), pp. 1–8.
15.
ChoiH., 2014. Constructions of marriage and sexuality in Modern Korea. In McLellandM.MackieV., eds. Routledge Handbook of Sexuality Studies in East Asia. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 87–100.
16.
ChuaL.J., 2018. The Politics of Love in Myanmar: LGBT Mobilization and Human Rights as a Way of Life. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
17.
CrépeauF.SheppardC., 2013. Introduction. In CrépeauF.SheppardC., eds. Human Rights and Diverse Societies: Challenges and Possibilities. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, pp. 1–8.
18.
DeflemM., 2008. The globalization of law. In DeflemM., ed. Sociology of Law: Visions of a Scholarly Tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 250–270.
19.
DeleuzeG.GuattariF., 2010 [1986]. Nomadology: The War Machine. Tr. MassumiB.Seattle: Wormwood Distribution.
20.
DonnellyJ., 1984. Cultural relativism and universal human rights. Human Rights Quarterly, 6(4), pp. 400–419.
21.
DonnellyJ., 2007. The relative universality of human rights. Human Rights Quarterly, 29(2), pp. 281–306.
22.
DouzinasC., 2000. Human rights and postmodern utopia. Law and Critique, 11(2), pp. 219–240.
23.
EscobarA., 2007. Worlds and knowledges otherwise. Cultural Studies, 21(2–3), pp. 179–210.
24.
FreemanM., 2011 [2002]. Human Rights: An Interdisciplinary Approach. Cambridge: Polity Press.
25.
GoodyJ., 1968. The myth of a state. The Journal of Modern African Studies, 6(4), pp. 461–473.
HerskovitsM., 1948. Man and His Works: The Science of Cultural Anthropology. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
28.
HuntS.HolmesC., 2015. Everyday decolonization: living a decolonizing queer politics. Journal of Lesbian Studies, 19(2), pp. 154–172.
29.
IsinE.F., 2013. Two regimes of rights? In GuillaumeX.HuysmansJ., eds. Citizenship and Security: The Constitution of Political Being. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 53–74.
30.
KennedyD., 2002. The international human rights movement: part of the problem?Harvard Human Rights Journal, 15, pp. 101–126.
31.
KoleS.K., 2007. Globalizing queer? AIDS, homophobia and the politics of sexual identity in India. Globalization and Health, 3(8), pp. 1–16.
32.
LeeP-H., 2018. The demagogies of ‘lack’: the WHO’s ambivalence to the right to health of LGBT people. Global Health Governance, XII(1), pp. 17–21.
33.
LeeP-H., 2019. Queer Asia’s body without organs: in the making of queer/decolonial politics. In LutherJ.D.Ung LohJ., eds. ‘Queer’ Asia: Decolonising and Reimagining Sexuality and Gender. London: Zed Books, pp. 219–241.
34.
LeeP-H., 2020. Multiplicity of queer activism in East Asia: a cosmopolitan imagination for justices. In JaworskiJ.A., ed. Advances in Sociology Research. Volume 30. New York: Nova Science Publishers, pp. 37–64.
35.
LeuprechtP., 2013. Universality and diversity. In CrépeauF.SheppardC., eds. Human Rights and Diverse Societies: Challenges and Possibilities. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, pp. 9–16.
36.
LugonesM., 2007. Heterosexualism and the colonial/modern gender system. Hypatia, 22(1), pp. 186–209.
37.
LugonesM., 2016. The coloniality of gender. In HarcourtW., ed. The Palgrave Handbook of Gender and Development: Critical Engagements in Feminist Theory and Practice. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 13–33.
38.
Madrigal-BorlozV., 2018. Report of the Independent Expert on Protection Against Violence and Discrimination Based on Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity. UN Doc A/HRC/38/43, 11 May. Available at: https://undocs.org/A/HRC/38/43 [last accessed 10 February 2021].
39.
MerryS.E., 2006a. Anthropology and international law. Annual Review of Anthropology, 35(1), pp. 99–116.
40.
MerryS.E., 2006b. Transnational human rights and local activism: mapping the middle. American Anthropologist, 108(1), pp. 38–51.
41.
MesserE., 1997. Pluralist approaches to human rights. Journal of Anthropological Research, 53(3), pp. 293–317.
42.
MignoloW.D., 2012. Local Histories/Global Designs: Coloniality, Subaltern Knowledges, and Border Thinking. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
43.
MignoloW.D., 2016. Foreword: decolonial body-geo-politics at large. In BakshiS.JivrajS.PosoccoS., eds. Decolonizing Sexualities: Transnational Perspectives, Critical Interventions. Oxford: Counterpress, pp. vii–xviii.
44.
MohantyC.T., 2013. Transnational feminist crossings: on neoliberalism and radical critique. Signs, 38(4), pp. 967–991.
45.
MouffeC., 1992. Feminism, citizenship, and radical democratic politics. In ButlerJ.ScottJ.W., eds. Feminists Theorize the Political. London: Routledge, pp. 369–384.
46.
MouffeC., 2013. Agonistics: Thinking The World Politically.London: Verso.
47.
MurrayC., 2019. Imperial dialectics and epistemic mapping: from decolonisation to anti-Eurocentric IR. European Journal of International Relations, 26(2), pp. 419–442.
48.
ObendorfS., 2006. Sodomy as metaphor. In DarbyP., ed. Postcolonizing the International: Working to Change the Way We Are. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press, pp. 177–206.
49.
Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR), 2011. Discriminatory Laws and Practices and Acts of Violence Against Individuals Based on Their Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity. UN Doc A/HRC/19/41, 17 November. New York: United Nations.
50.
Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR), 2015. Discrimination and Violence Against Individuals Based on Their Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity. UN Doc A/HRC/29/23, 4 May. New York: United Nations.
51.
OffordB., 2013. Queer activist intersections in Southeast Asia: human rights and cultural studies. Asian Studies Review, 37(3), pp. 335–349.
52.
OrfordA., 1999. Muscular humanitarianism: reading the narratives of the new interventionism. European Journal of International Law, 10(4), pp. 679–711.
53.
PerryM.J., 1997. Are human rights universal? The relativist challenge and related matters. Human Rights Quarterly, 19(3), pp. 461–509.
54.
PlummerK., 1998. Introducing sexualities. Sexualities, 1, pp. 5–10.
55.
PuarJ., 2007. Terrorist Assemblages: Homonationalism in Queer Times. Durham: Duke University Press.
56.
PuarJ.K.RaiA.S., 2002. Monster, terrorist, fag: the war on terrorism and the production of docile patriots. Social Text, 20(3), pp. 117–148.
57.
RaoR., 2014. The locations of homophobia. London Review of International Law, 2(2), pp. 169–199.
58.
Reus-SmitC., 2014. International law. In BaylisJ.SmithS.OwensP., eds. The Globalization of World Politics: An Introduction to International Relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 301–315.
59.
RoseN., 1996. Identity, genealogy, history. In HallS.Du GayP., eds. Questions of Cultural Identity. London: SAGE, pp. 128–150.
60.
SandersD., 2011. The rainbow lobby: the sexual diversity network and the military-installed government in Thailand. In JacksonP.A., eds. Queer Bangkok: 21st Century Markets, Media, and Rights. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press, pp. 229–250.
61.
SantosB.d.S., 2013. Human rights: a fragile hegemony. In CrépeauF.SheppardC., eds. Human Rights and Diverse Societies: Challenges and Possibilities. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, pp. 17–26.
62.
SchwenkeC., 2017. An American’s view of trans* emergence in Africa and feminist responses. In HarcourtW., ed. Bodies in Resistance: Gender and Sexual Politics in the Age of Neoliberalism. London: Palgrave, pp. 329–344.
63.
SymonsJ.AltmanD., 2015. International norm polarization: sexuality as a subject of human rights protection. International Theory, 7(1), pp. 61–95.
64.
TilleyJ.J., 2000. Cultural relativism. Human Rights Quarterly, 22(2), pp. 501–547.
65.
TlostanovaM.MignoloW., 2012. Learning to Unlearn: Decolonial Reflections from Eurasia and the Americas. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
66.
TodorovT., 2000. Hope and Memory: Lessons from the Twentieth Century.Princeton: Princeton University Press.
67.
TurnerB.S., 2006. Vulnerability and Human Rights. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
68.
United Nations General Assembly (UNGA), 1971. United Nations General Assembly: Resolution 2625 (XXV) Declaration on Principles of International Law Concerning Friendly Relations and Co-operation Among States in Accordance with the Charter of the United Nations. The American Journal of International Law, 65(1), pp. 243–251.
69.
United Nations General Assembly (UNGA), 1993. Vienna Declaration and Programme of Action. UN Doc A/CONF.157/23, 12 July. New York: United Nations.
70.
United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC), 2014a. Human Rights, Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity: Resolution Adopted by the Human Rights Council, 2 October 2014. UN Doc A/HRC/RES/27/32, 2 October. Available at: https://www.refworld.org/docid/55ed69214.html [last accessed 17 April 2021].
71.
United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC), 2014b. Report of the Human Rights Council on Its Twenty-Seventh Session, by the Vice-President and Rapporteur: Ms. Katerˇina Sequensová (Czech Republic). UN Doc A/HRC/27/2, 22 December. Geneva: United Nations Human Rights Office of the High Commissioner (OHCHR). Available at: https://www.ohchr.org/EN/HRBodies/HRC/RegularSessions/Session27/Documents/A.HRC.27.2.AUV.doc [last accessed 10 February 2021].
72.
WaitesM., 2020. Global sexualities: towards a reconciliation between decolonial analysis and human rights. In BertoneC.DavyZ.SantosA.C.ThoresonR.WieringaS.E., eds. The SAGE Handbook of Global Sexualities.London: SAGE, pp. 32–56.
73.
WeberC., 2016. Queer International Relations: Sovereignty, Sexuality and the Will to Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
74.
WilcoxL., 2014. Queer theory and the “proper objects” of international relations. International Studies Review, 16(4), pp. 612–615.
75.
World Health Organization (WHO), 2013. Executive Board, 133rd Session: Official Records (including Resolutions, Decisions, Annexes, Summary Records, and List of Participants). UN Doc EB133/2013/REC/1, 30 May. Geneva: World Health Organization. Available at: https://apps.who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/EB133-REC1/B133_REC1-en.pdf [last accessed 11 February 2021].
76.
WynterS., 2003. Unsettling the coloniality of being/power/truth/freedom: towards the human, after man, its overrepresentation—an argument. CR: The New Centennial Review, 3(3), pp. 257–337.
77.
YangD.W.J., 2020. From conditionality to convergence: tracing the discursive shift in homo-developmentalism. Australian Feminist Law Journal, 12 October. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/13200968.2020.1821459 [last accessed 14 May 2021].
ZabusC., 2014. The transgendered nation: intersexions between the nation-state and the transsexual subject. In ZabusC., ed. The Future of Postcolonial Studies. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 199–216.
