The Repeal campaign articulated new and transformative relationships between law, reproduction and the political in Ireland. During the campaign, ordinary people took ownership of and participated in mutual teaching and critique of law on a wide scale. Art, along these lines, was often used to document and archive the injustices worked by the 8th Amendment. However, art also became a means of imagining law otherwise. In this piece, I use Jacques Rancière’s work on the relationship between aesthetics and politics to analyse artistic contributions to feminist legal discourses associated with Repeal.
Aches, 2018. Mural of Savita Halappanavar. Street art. Dublin.
2.
AghaP., 2017. Undoing law: public art as contest over meanings. In LermaM.L.EtxabeJ., eds. Rancière and Law. Abingdon and New York: Routledge, pp. 151–165.
3.
An Act to Repeal an Act, made in the Parliament of Ireland in the Twenty Eighth Year of the Reign of Queen Elizabeth, against Witchcraft and Sorcery, 1821. 1 & 2 George 4 c.17. Dublin: Houses of the Oireachtas, Government of Ireland.
4.
BerlantL., 2000. The subject of true feeling. In DeanJ., ed. Cultural Studies & Political Theory. New York: Cornell University Press, p. 42.
CalkinS., 2019. Healthcare not airfare! Art, abortion and political agency in Ireland. Gender, Place & Culture, 26(3), pp. 338–361.
9.
ChanS., 2018. Speaking of silence, speaking of art, abortion and Ireland. Irish Studies Review, 27(1), pp. 73–93.
10.
ClarksonC., 2012. ‘The obliging etymology of “nomos”’: Peter Fitzpatrick and the aesthetics of law: Carrol Clarkson. In BuchananR.MothaS.PahujaS., eds. Reading Modern Law. Abingdon and New York: Routledge-Cavendish, pp. 176–188.
11.
CoverR.M., 1983. The Supreme Court, 1982 term—foreword: nomos and narrative. Harvard Law Review, 97, pp. 4–68.
CrawleyK., 2015. The critical force of irony: reframing photographs in cultural legal studies. In SharpeC.LeiboffM., eds. Cultural Legal Studies: Law’s Popular Cultures and the Metamorphosis of Law. Abingdon and New York: Routledge, pp. 201–223.
de LondrasF., 2020. ‘A hope raised and then defeated’? The continuing harms of Irish abortion law. Feminist Review, 124. DOI: 10.1177/0141778919897582.
18.
de LondrasFEnrightM., 2018. Repealing the 8th: Reforming Irish Abortion Law. Bristol: Policy Press.
19.
DerridaJ., 1992. Acts of Literature. Hove: Psychology Press.
20.
DouzinasC.NeadL., 1999. Law and the Image: the Authority of Art and the Aesthetics of Law. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
EnrightM., 2019. Abortion law in Ireland: reflecting on reform. In BlackL.DunneP., eds. Law and Gender in Modern Ireland: Critique and Reform. Oxford and London: Hart Publishing pp. 55–70.
26.
EwickP.SilbeyS.S., 1998. The Common Place of Law: Stories from Everyday Life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Finchett-MaddockL., 2017. In vacuums of law we find: outsider poiesis in street art and graffiti. Working paper, Social Science Research Network (SSRN). Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=3066309 [last accessed 3 January 2019].
FitzpatrickP., 2001. Modernism and the Grounds of Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
32.
FletcherR., 1998. Pro-life absolutes, feminist challenges: the fundamentalist narrative of Irish abortion law 1986–1992. Osgoode Hall LJ, 36(1), pp. 1–62.
33.
FletcherR., 2018. #RepealedThe8th: translating travesty, global conversation, and the Irish abortion referendum. Feminist Legal Studies, 26(3), pp. 233–259.
FrostC., 2017. Summoning sovereignty: constituent power and poetic prophecy in Ireland’s 1916 Proclamation of the Republic. Constellations, 24(1), pp. 76–88.
36.
GeareyA.GardnerJ., 2001. Law and Aesthetics. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
LovettM., 2018. ‘Bewitched, bothered and bewildered’ Jesse Jones, Tremble Tremble Project Arts Centre, 8 June – 18 July, 2018. Circa Art Magazine, 16July. Available at: https://circaartmagazine.net/jesse-jones-tremble-tremble/ [last accessed 2 January 2019].
MatthewsD., 2017. Narrative, space and atmosphere: a nomospheric inquiry into Hong Kong’s pro-democracy ‘Umbrella Movement’. Social & Legal Studies, 26(1), pp. 25–46.
58.
MayT., 2008. The Political Thought of Jacques Rancière: Creating Equality. University Park: Penn State Press.
59.
McAvoyS., 2013. Vindicating women’s rights in a fetocentric state: the longest Irish journey. In GiffneyN.ShildrickM., eds. Theory on the Edge: Irish Studies and the Politics of Sexual Difference. New York: Palgrave Macmillan US, pp. 39–60.
NicGhabhannN., 2018. City walls, bathroom stalls and tweeting the Taoiseach: the aesthetics of protest and the campaign for abortion rights in the Republic of Ireland. Continuum, 32(5), pp. 553–568.
68.
NorvalA.J., 2012. ‘Writing a name in the sky’: Rancière, Cavell, and the possibility of egalitarian inscription. The American Political Science Review, 106(4), pp. 810–826.
O’TooleE., 2017. Waking the feminists: re-imagining the space of the National Theatre in the era of the Celtic Phoenix. Lit: Literature Interpretation Theory, 28(2), pp. 134–152.
RancièreJ., 2008. Aesthetic separation, aesthetic community: scenes from the aesthetic regime of art. Art & Research, 2(1), pp. 1–15.
86.
RancièreJ., 2009. Aesthetics and Its Discontents. Cambridge: Polity.
87.
RancièreJ., 2011. Politics of Literature. Cambridge: Polity.
88.
RancièreJ., 2014. The Emancipated Spectator. New York: Verso.
89.
RancièreJ., 2015. Dissensus: On Politics and Aesthetics. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
90.
RancièreJ.PanagiaD.BowlbyR., 2001. Ten theses on politics. Theory & Event, 5(3). Available at: https://muse.jhu.edu/article/32639 [last accessed 5 September 2019].
91.
ResnikJ.CurtisD.E., 2011. Representing Justice: Invention, Controversy, and Rights in City-States and Democratic Courtrooms. New Haven: Yale University Press.
92.
RilesA., 2005. A new agenda for the cultural study of law: taking on the technicalities. Buffalo Law Review, 53, pp. 973–1034.
ScarryE., 2013. On Beauty and Being Just. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
96.
SchaapA., 2016. Law and Agonistic Politics. Abingdon: Routledge.
97.
SheldonS., 2018. Empowerment and privacy? Home use of abortion pills in the Republic of Ireland. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 43(4), pp. 823–849.
SparksH., 2016. Quarreling with Rancière: race, gender, and the politics of democratic disruption. Philosophy & Rhetoric, 49(4), pp. 420–437.
102.
Terminal, 2016. Film. Directed by Natasha Waugh. Ireland: Fight Back Films. Available at: https://fightbackfilms.com/terminal/ [last accessed 7 January 2019].
