ContiL., 1981. Il Tormento e lo Scudo: Un Compromesso Contro le Donne [The Torment and the Shield: A Compromise Against Women]. Milan: Mazzotta [in Italian].
5.
De ZordoS., 2017. ‘Good doctors do not object’: obstetricians-gynaecologists’ perspectives on conscientious objection to abortion care and their engagement with pro-abortion rights protests in Italy. In De ZordoS.MishtalJ.AntonL., eds. A Fragmented Landscape: Abortion Governance and Protest Logics in Europe. New York: Berghahn Books, pp. 147–168.
FletcherJ.SheldonS., 2017. Vacuum aspiration for induced abortion could be safely and legally performed by nurses and midwives. Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care, 43(4), pp. 260–264.
HanafinP., 2007. Conceiving Life: Reproductive Politics and the Law in Contemporary Italy. Farnham: Ashgate.
12.
Health (Regulation of Termination of Pregnancy) Act 2018. No. 31 of 2018. Dublin: House of the Oireachtas. Available at: https://www.oireachtas.ie/en/bills/bill/2018/105/ [last accessed 1 June 2019].
13.
HeathcoteG., 2019. Feminist Dialogues on International Law: Success, Tensions, Futures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
14.
HerveyT.SheldonS., 2017. Abortion by telemedicine in Northern Ireland: patient and professional rights to free movement across borders. Northern Ireland Law Quarterly, 68(1), pp. 1–33.
15.
HerveyT.SheldonS., 2019. Abortion by telemedicine in the European Union. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 145(1), pp. 125–128.
Istituto Nazionale di Statistica (ISTAT), 2018. Natalità e Fecondità della Popolazione Residente [Natality and Fertility of the Resident Population]. Rome: Istituto Nazionale di Statistica. Available at: https://www.istat.it/it/archivio/224393 [last accessed 1 June 2019] [in Italian].
19.
KrauseE., 2012. “They just happened”: the curious case of the unplanned baby, Italian low fertility, and the “end” of rationality. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 26(3), pp. 361–382.
La Repubblica, 2017. Aborto, denuncia Cgil: donna respinta da 23 ospedali, soluzione solo dopo nostro intervento [Abortion, CGIL complaints: woman rejected by 23 hospitals, solution only after our intervention]. La Repubblica, 1March. Available at: http://www.repubblica.it/cronaca/2017/03/01/news/padova_aborto_respinta_23_ospedali-159526952/ [last accessed 1 June 2019] [in Italian].
22.
LussanaF., 2012. Il movimento femminista in Italia. Esperienze, storie, memorie [The Feminist Movement in Italy: Experiences, Stories, Memories]. Rome: Carocci Editore [in Italian].
Ministero della Salute, 2010. Linee di Indirizzo sulla Interruzione Volontaria di Gravidanza con Mifepristone e Prostaglandine [Guidelines on the Voluntary Termination of Pregnancy by Mifepristone and Prostaglandine]. Rome: Ministero della Salute. Available at: http://www.salute.gov.it/imgs/C_17_pubblicazioni_1302_allegato.pdf [last accessed 1 June 2019] [in Italian].
25.
Ministero della Salute, 2019. Relazione sull’ Attuazione Legge 194/78 Tutela Sociale Maternità e Interruzione Volontaria di Gravidanza – Dati Definitivi 2017 [Report on the Implementation of Law 194/78 on Social Protection of Maternity and Voluntary Interruption of Pregnancy – 2017 Final Data]. Rome: Ministero della Salute. Available at: http://www.salute.gov.it/portale/donna/dettaglioPubblicazioniDonna.jsp?lingua=italiano&id=2807 [last accessed 1 June 2019] [in Italian].
26.
NiccolaiS., 2006. Una sfera pubblica piccola piccola. La sentenza 27/1975 in materia di aborto [A very tiny public sphere: the Judgment No. 27/1975 on abortion]. In BinR.BrunelliG.PugiottoA.VeronesiP., eds.“Effettività” e “Seguito” delle Tecniche Decisorie della Corte Costituzionale. Naples: Edizioni Esi, pp. 563–579 [in Italian].
27.
ParisE., 2019. “No one is illegal”: law and the possibilities for radical cosmopolitics. In CărăuşT.ParisE., eds. Migration, Protest Movements and the Politics of Resistance. London: Routledge, pp. 224–243.
28.
ScirèG., 2008. L’aborto in Italia. Storia di Una Legge [Abortion in Italy: History of a Law]. Milan: Bruno Mondadori [in Italian].
29.
SheldonS., 1997. Beyond Control: Medical Power and Abortion Law. London: Pluto.
30.
SmartC., 1990. Law’s power, the sexed body, and feminist discourse. Journal of Law and Society, 17(2), p. 194–210.
31.
SmartC., 1992. The woman of legal discourse. Social & Legal Studies, 1(1), pp. 29–44.
32.
United Nations Committee for the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW), 2017. Concluding Observations on the Seventh Periodic Report of Italy. UN Doc CEDAW/C/ITA/CO/7, 24July. New York: CEDAW, United Nations.
33.
United Nations Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, 2015. Concluding Observations on the Fifth Periodic Report of Italy. UN Doc E/C.12/ITA/CO/5, 12October. Geneva: UN on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, United Nations.
34.
United Nations Human Rights Committee (HRC), 2017. Concluding Observations on the Sixth Periodic Report of Italy. UN Doc CCPR/C/ITA/CO/6, 1May. New York: HRC, United Nations.
35.
World Health Organization (WHO), Department of Reproductive Health and Research, 2012. Safe Abortion: Technical and Policy Guidance for Health Systems. Geneva: WHO, Department of Reproductive Health and Research. Available at: https://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/unsafe_abortion/9789241548434/en/ [last accessed 1 June 2019].