In the context of Ireland’s new legislation governing abortion, I outline and examine the spatial consequences of political decision-making. I argue that Ireland’s new abortion law and its clinical guidance permit travel for some pregnant people but impose fixity on others. I analyse the spatial consequences of legal limitations, including non-medically necessary delays in care and medical control of medication abortions, that necessitate travel for abortion. I demonstrate how current laws fix some pregnant people in place, including diverse migrant populations within Ireland, with no possibilities for abortion-related travel. This critique of the ‘new’ law demonstrates the Irish state’s continued political and medical control of abortion.
AikenA.DogolI.TrussellJ.GompertsR., 2017. Self-reported outcomes and adverse events after medical abortion through online telemedicine: population based study in the Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland. British Medical Journal, 357, pp. 1–8.
3.
AskolaH., 2018. Dropping the ball or holding the line? Challenges to abortion laws in the Nordic Countries. Women’s Studies International Forum, 66, pp. 25–32.
4.
BacikI., 2013. The Irish Constitution and gender politics: developments in the law on abortion. Irish Political Studies, 28(3), pp. 380–398.
5.
BaileyA., 2013. Migration, recession and an emerging transnational biopolitics across Europe. Geoforum, 44, pp. 202–210.
6.
BairdB., 2015. Medical abortion in Australia: A short history. Reproductive Health Matters, 23(46), pp. 169–176.
BarkeN., 2019. Beyond the borders of Brexit: traveling for abortion access in a post-EU Britain. In SethnaC.DavisG., eds. Abortion Across Borders. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, pp. 310–336.
Boston Women’s Health Book Collective, 2011. Our Bodies Ourselves. New York: Simon and Schuster.
11.
BurnsE., 2018. Intersectionality and the Irish abortion rights campaign. Presentation made at 10th International Disability Law Summer School, 21 June. Galway.
12.
BurrellK., 2017. The recalcitrance of distance: exploring the infrastructures of sending in migrants’ lives. Mobilities, 12(6), pp. 813–826.
CalkinS., 2019. Towards a political geography of abortion. Political Geography, 69, pp. 22–29.
16.
CalkinS.FreemanC., 2019. Trails and technology: social and cultural geographies of abortion access. Social and Cultural Geography, 20(9), pp. 1325–1332.
17.
CalkinS.KaminskaM., 2020. Persistence and change in morality policy: the role of the Catholic Church and the changing politics of abortion in Ireland and Poland. Feminist Review, 124. DOI: 10.1177/0141778919894451.
18.
ChambersC.MacQuarrieC.MacDonaldJ., 2019. Trials and trails: the emergence of Canada’s “abortion refugees”. In SethnaC.DavisG., eds. Abortion across Borders. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University, pp. 201–217.
19.
Coalition to Repeal the Eighth Amendment, 2017. Paper of the Coalition to Repeal the Eighth Amendment delivered to the Citizens’ Assembly on 05 March 2017. Presentation made at Citizens’ Assembly, 5March. Dublin. Available at: https://www.citizensassembly.ie/en/Meetings/Coalition-to-Repeal-the-Eighth-s-Paper.pdf [last accessed 25 November 2018].
20.
CohenI., 2012. Medical outlaws or medical refugees? An examination of circumvention tourism. In HodgesJ.TurnerL.KimballA., eds. Medical Tourism: Understanding the Dynamics of the Global Market. Santa Barbara: ABC-CLIO, pp. 207–229.
CurtisP.ThompsonJ.FairbrotherH., 2018. Migrant children within Europe: a systematic review of children’s perspectives on their health experiences. Public Health, 158, pp. 71–85.
29.
DavisG.O’NeillJ.ParkerC.SheldonS., 2019. All aboard the “abortion express”: geographic variability, domestic travel, and the 1967 Abortion Act. In DavisG.SethnaC., eds. Abortion Across Borders. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, pp. 101–122.
de LondrasF., 2016. Fatal fetal abnormality, Irish Constitutional Law andMellet v Ireland. Medical Law Review, 24(4), pp. 591–607.
32.
de LondrasF., 2020. ‘A hope raised and then defeated?’ The continuing harms of Irish abortion law. Feminist Review, 124. DOI: 10.1177/0141778919897582.
33.
de LondrasF.EnrightM., 2018. Repealing the 8th: Reforming Irish Abortion Law. Bristol: Policy Press.
34.
de LondrasF.MarkicevicM., 2018. Reforming abortion law in Ireland: reflections on the public submissions to the Citizens’ Assembly. Women’s Studies International Forum, 70, pp. 89–98.
35.
DunnS.CookR., 2014. Medical abortion in Canada: behind the times. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 186(1), pp. 13–14.
36.
Earner-ByrneL.UrquhartD., 2019. The Irish Abortion Journey, 1920–2018. Cham: Palgrave Pivot.
37.
EnrightM., 2018. Reflections of Ireland’s new abortion legislation. feminists@law, 8(2), pp. 1–12.
ErdmanJ., 2018. Urgency and institutionality: legal, policy and ethical issues. Conference paper presented at Abortion Beyond Bounds, 12 October. McGill University, Montréal.
40.
ErdmanJ.JelinskaK.YanowS., 2018. Understandings of self-managed abortion as health inequity, harm reduction, and social change. Reproductive Health Matters, 26(54), pp. 13–19.
FaistT., 2013. The mobility turn? A new paradigm for the social sciences. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 36(1), pp. 1637–1646.
43.
Fine-DavisM., 2015. Gender Roles in Ireland: Three Decades of Attitude Change. New York: Routledge.
44.
FletcherR., 2014. Contesting the cruel treatment of abortion-seeking women. Reproductive Health Matters, 22(44), pp. 10–21.
45.
FletcherR., 2017. Attorney General v X re-imagined. In EnrightM.McCandlessJ.O’DonoghueA., eds. Northern/Irish Feminist Judgments: Judges’ Troubles and the Gendered Politics of Identity. Oxford: Bloomsbury, pp. 379–393.
46.
FletcherR., 2018. #Repealedthe8th: translating travesty, global conversation, and the Irish abortion referendum. Feminist Legal Studies, 26(3), pp. 233–259.
47.
GanatraB.GuestP.BererM., 2015. Expanding access to medical abortion: challenges and opportunities. Reproductive Health Matters, 22(44S1), pp. 1–3.
48.
GilmartinM.KennedyS., 2019. A double movement: the politics of reproductive mobility in Ireland. In SethnaC.DavisG., eds. Abortion Across Borders. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University, pp. 123–143.
GrindlayK.LaneK.GrossmanD., 2013. Women’s and provider’s experiences with medical abortion provided through telemedicine: a qualitative study. Women’s Health Issues, 23(2), pp. 117–122.
51.
GrossmanD.GrindlayK.BuchackerT.LaneK.BlanchardK., 2011. Effectiveness and acceptability of medical abortion provided through telemedicine. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 118(2), pp. 296–303.
52.
GrottiV.MalakasisC.QuagliarielloC.SahraouiN., 2018. Shifting vulnerabilities: gender and reproductive care on the migrant trail to Europe. Comparative Migration Studies, 6(23), pp. 1–18.
53.
HansonS., 2010. Gender and mobility: new approaches to informing sustainability. Gender, Place and Culture, 17(1), pp. 5–23.
HernándezE., 2017. Legal strategies to protect sexual and reproductive health and rights in the context of the refugee crisis in Europe: a complaint before the European ombudsperson. Reproductive Health Matters, 25(5), pp. 151–160.
58.
HerveyT.SheldonS., 2017. Abortion by telemedicine in Northern Ireland: patient and professional rights across borders. Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly, 68(1), pp. 1–33.
Irish Family Planning Association (IFPA), 2019. IFPA Submission on Direct Provision to the Oireachtas Committee on Justice and Equality, May 2019. Dublin: IFPA. Available at: https://www.ifpa.ie/app/uploads/2019/06/Direct-Provision.pdf [last accessed 25 June 2019].
KaplanC., 1996. Questions of Travel: Postmodern Discourses of Displacement. Durham: Duke University Press.
68.
KennedyS.GilmartinM., 2018. Mobility, migrants and abortion in Ireland. In MacQuarrieC.BloomerF.PiersonC.StettnerS., eds. Crossing Troubled Waters: Abortion in Ireland, Northern Ireland, and Prince Edward Island. Charlottetown: Island Press, pp. 138–160.
69.
LawR., 1999. Beyond ‘women and transport’: towards new geographies of gender and daily mobility. Progress in Human Geography, 23(4), pp. 567–588.
70.
LedouxC.PilotE.DiazE.KrafftT., 2018. Migrants’ access to healthcare services within the European Union: a content analysis of policy documents in Ireland, Portugal, Spain. Globalization and Heath, 14(57), pp. 1–11.
71.
LentinR., 2013. (M)other Ireland: migrant women subverting the nation state? In UlinJ.EdwardsH.O’BrienS., eds. Race and Immigration in the New Ireland. Notre Dame: Notre Dame University Press, pp. 51–73.
LøkelandM., 2017. One step forward and two steps back: accessing abortion in Norway. In de ZordoS.MishtalJ.AntonL., eds. A Fragmented Landscape: Abortion Governance and Protest Logics in Europe. New York: Berghahn, pp. 187–205.
74.
LuibhéidE., 2013. Pregnant on Arrival: Making the Illegal Immigrant. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Migrant and Ethnic Minorities for Reproductive Justice (MERJ), 2018. Racism and reproductive health: migrant rights and the Irish Abortion Referendum. International Viewpoint, 26May. Available at: http://www.internationalviewpoint.org/spip.php?article5535 [last accessed 28 October 2018].
81.
MorganL., 2017. Reproductive governance meets European abortion politics. In De ZordoS.MishtalJ.AntonL., eds. A Fragmented Landscape: Abortion Governance and Protest Logics in Europe. New York: Berghahn, pp. 266–282.
82.
MountzA., 2015. In/visibility and the securitization of migration: shaping publics through border enforcement on islands. Cultural Politics, 11(2), pp. 184–200.
83.
MullallyS., 2008. Migrant women destabilising borders: citizenship debates in Ireland. In CooperD.GrahamE., eds. Intersectionality and Beyond: Law, Power and the Politics of Location. London: Routledge, pp. 251–287.
NaughtonC.DrennanJ.HydeA.AllenD.O’BoyleK.FelleP.ButlerM., 2012. An evaluation of the appropriateness and safety of nurse and midwife prescribing in Ireland. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 69(7), pp. 1478–1488.
86.
NgoT.ParkM.ShakurH.FreeC., 2011. Comparative effectiveness, safety and acceptability of medical abortion at home and in a clinic: a systemic review. Bulletin of World Health Organization, 89(5), pp. 360–370.
87.
NormanW.DickensB., 2017. Abortion by telemedicine: an equitable option for Irish women. British Medical Journal, 357. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.j2237 [last accessed 12 October 2018].
PieperH.ClerkinP.MacFarlaneA., 2011. The impact of direct provision accommodation for asylum seekers on organization and delivery of local primary care and social care services: a case study. BMC Family Practice, 12(32). Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3123194/ [last accessed 10 February 2019].
92.
PruittL.VanegasM.2015. Urbanoramativity, spatial privilege and judicial blind spots in abortion law. Berkeley Journal of Gender, Law and Justice, 30(1), pp. 76–153.
93.
RossiterA., 2000. Ireland’s Hidden Diaspora: ‘The Abortion Trail’ and the Making of a London-Irish Underground, 1980–2000. London: IASC.
SethnaC., 2019. Introduction. In SethnaC.DavisG., eds. Abortion Across Borders. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University, pp. 1–22.
97.
SethnaC.DoullM., 2012. Accidental tourists: Canadian women, abortion tourism, and travel. Women’s Studies: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 41(4), pp. 457–475.
98.
SethnaC.DoullM., 2013. Spatial disparities and travel to freestanding abortion clinics in Canada. Women’s Studies International Forum, 38, pp. 52–62.
SheldonS., 2016a. British Abortion law: speaking for the past to govern the future. Modern Law Review, 79(2), pp. 283–316.
101.
SheldonS., 2016b. How can a state control swallowing? The home use of medical abortion pills in Ireland. Reproductive Health Matters, 24(48), pp. 90–101.
102.
SheldonS.FletcherJ., 2017. Vacuum aspiration for induced abortion could be safely and legally performed by nurses and midwives. Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care, 43(4), pp. 260–264.
103.
SideK., 2011. A.B.C v. Ireland: a new beginning to access legal abortion in the Republic of Ireland?International Feminist Journal of Politics, 13(3), pp. 391–413.
104.
SideK., 2016. The geopolitics of abortion, migration and mobility: the Republic of Ireland. Gender, Place and Culture: A Journal of Feminist Geography23(12), pp. 1788–1799.
105.
SideK., 2018. Medical abortion use: post-referendum possibilities. Human Rights in Ireland, 16April. Available at: http://www.humanrights.ie/ [last accessed 24 June 2019].
106.
SmithJ., 2007. Ireland’s Magdalen Laundries and the Nation’s Architecture of Containment. Notre Dame: Notre Dame Press.
107.
UlinJ.EdwardsH.O’BrienS., eds., 2013. Race and Immigration in the New Ireland. Notre Dame: Notre Dame University Press.
WhitakerR.HorganG., 2017. Abortion governance in the new Northern Ireland. In De ZordoS.MishtalJ.AntonL., eds. A Fragmented Landscape: Abortion Governance and Protest Logics in Europe. New York: Berghahn, pp. 245–265.
111.
ZampasC., 2017. Legal and political discourses of women’s right to abortion. In De ZordoS.MishtalJ.AntonL., eds. A Fragmented Landscape: Abortion Governance and Protest Logics in Europe. New York: Berghahn Books, pp. 23–45.
