In light of recent developments that have occurred in the domestic sector in Europe and the debate on the externalisation of domestic and care activities, this article explores the impact of the gender regime on paid domestic work. The gender regime is defined here as the combination of two dimensions: gender equality outcomes and the ‘gender contract’. The aim is to investigate whether the gender regime can contribute to explaining cross-national similarities and differences, in terms of the size of the domestic sector, its workforce composition—with a focus on the proportion of women and migrants—and its working conditions. The article shows the results of quantitative analyses conducted at the European level, which include the construction of a typology of gender regimes, based on selected indicators, and a descriptive comparative analysis of the domestic sector at national level, based on data from the 2015 European Union Labour Force Survey (EU-LFS). The findings suggest that the use of this typology of gender regimes can be a useful tool to explain cross-European differences in the domestic sector, but only regarding the size of the sector and the feminisation of the workforce. Concerning the proportion of migrants and working conditions in the domestic sector, no clear pattern emerges that can explain cross-national differences based on this typology.
AmbrosiniM., 2013. Immigrazione irregolare e welfare invisibile. Il lavoro di cura attraverso le frontiere. Bologna: Il Mulino [in Italian].
2.
AndallJ., 2000. Gender, Migration and the Domestic Service: the Politics of Black Women in Italy. Aldershot: Ashgate.
3.
AndersonB., 2000. Doing the Dirty Work? The Global Politics of Domestic Labour. London: Zed Books.
4.
AndersonB., 2007. A very private business: exploring the demand for migrant domestic workers. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 14(3), pp. 247–264.
5.
AnttonenA.SipiläJ., 1996. European social care services: is it possible to identify models?Journal of European Social Policy, 6(2), pp. 87–100.
6.
BettioF.PlantengaJ., 2004. Comparing care regimes in Europe. Feminist Economics, 10(1), pp. 85–113.
7.
CatanzaroR.ColomboA., eds., 2009. Badanti and Co. Il lavoro domestico straniero in Italia. Bologna: Il Mulino [in Italian].
8.
CoxR., 2006. The Servant Problem: Domestic Employment in a Global Economy. London: I.B. Tauris.
9.
DegavreF.NyssensM., 2012. Care Regimes on the Move: Comparing Home Care for Dependent Older People in Belgium, England, Germany and Italy. Louvain-la-Neuve: Université Catholique de Louvain. Available at: http://hdl.handle.net/2078.1/112096 [last accessed 15 May 2019].
10.
DevetterF.Jany-CatriceF.RibaultT., 2015. Les services à la personne dans les économies tertiaires. Paris: La Découverte [in French].
DuncanS.Pfau-EffingerB., eds., 2000. Gender, Economy and Culture in the European Union. New York: Routledge.
13.
Esping-AndersenG., 1990. The Three World of Welfare Capitalism. London: Polity Press.
14.
European Commission, Directorate-General for Justice and Consumers and TNS Opinion & Social, 2015. Special Eurobarometer 428 “Gender Equality”. Brussels: European Commission.
15.
European Institute for Gender Equality, 2015. Gender Equality Index 2015: Measuring Gender Equality in the European Union 2005–2012. Vilnius: European Institute for Gender Equality.
16.
FarvaqueN.BroughtonA.LedermaierS.KelemenM.VossE.WagnerM., 2013. Developing Personal and Household Services in the EU: A Focus on Household Activities. Lille: ORSEU.
17.
GerhardU.KnijnT.WeckwertA., eds., 2005. Working Mothers in Europe: A Comparison of Policies and Practices. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
18.
GieleJ., 2006. The changing gender contract as the engine of work-and-family policies. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis, 8(2), pp. 115–128.
19.
HochschildA.R.EhrenreichB., 2002. Global Woman: Nannies, Maids and Sex Workers in the New Economy. New York: Metropolitan Books.
20.
International Labour Organization (ILO), 2013. Domestic Workers Across the World: Global and Regional Statistics and the Extent of Legal Protection. Geneva: International Labour Organisation.
21.
LeiraA., 2002. Updating the “gender contract”? Childcare reforms in the Nordic countries in the 1990s. NORA – Nordic Kornal of Feminist and Gender Research, 10(2), pp. 81–89.
22.
LetablierM.T., 2009. Régimes d’état-providence et conventions de genre en Europe. Informations Sociales, 151(1), pp. 102–109 [in French].
23.
LewisJ., 1992. Gender and the development of welfare regimes. Journal of European Social Studies, 2(3), pp. 159–173.
24.
LutzH., ed., 2008. Migration and Domestic Work: A European Perspective on a Global Theme. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing.
25.
LutzH., 2011. The New Maids: Transnational Women and the Care Economy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
26.
MarradiA., 1990. Classification, typology, taxonomy. Quality and Quantity, 24(2), pp. 129–157.
27.
McDowellL., 2016. Youth, children and families in austere times: change, politics and a new gender contract. Royal Geographical Society, 49(3), pp. 311–316.
MósesdóttirL.EllingsæterA., 2017. Ideational struggles over women’s part-time work in Norway: destabilizing the gender contract. Economic and Industrial Democracy. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0143831X16681483 [last accssed 3 June 2019].
30.
ParrenasR., 2001. Servants of Globalisation: Women, Migration and Domestic Work. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
31.
Pfau-EffingerB., 2002. Changing welfare states and labour markets in the context of European gender arrangements. In AndersenJ.G.JensenP.H., eds. Changing Labour Markets, Welfare Policies and Citizenship. Bristol: Policy Press, pp. 235–256.
32.
SainsburyD., ed., 1994. Gendering Welfare States. London: Sage.
33.
SaracenoC.KeckW., 2010. Can we identify intergenerational policy regimes in Europe?European Societies, 12(5), pp. 675–696.
34.
SartiR., 2008. The globalisation of domestic service. In LutzH., ed. Migration and Domestic Work: A European Perspective on a Global Theme. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing, pp. 77–97.
35.
SartiR.ScrinziF., 2010. Introduction to the special issue: men in a woman’s job, male domestic workers, international migration and the globalization of care. Men and Masculinities, 13(1), pp. 4–15.
ScrinziF., 2011. Gender, migration and the ambiguous enterprise of professionalizing domestic service: the case of vocational training for the unemployed in France. Feminist Review, 98, pp. 153–172.
38.
SimonazziA., 2009. Care regimes and national employment models. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 33(2), pp. 211–232.
39.
SoláA.G., 2016. Constructing work travel inequalities: the role of household gender contract. Journal of Transport Geography, 53, pp. 32–40.
40.
UngersonC., 2000. Thinking about the production and consumption of long-term care in Britain: does gender still matter?Journal of Social Policy, 29(4), pp. 623–643.
41.
WilliamsF., 1995. Race, ethnicity, gender and class in welfare states: a framework for comparative analysis. Social Politics, 2(2), pp. 127–139.
42.
ZdravomyslovaE., 2010. Working mothers and nannies: commercialization of childcare and modifications in the gender contract. Anthropology of East Europe Review, 28(2), pp. 200–225.
