Department of Health.Guidelines for Offering Voluntary Named HIV Antibody Testing to Women Receiving Ante-natal Care.London: Department of Health, 1994.
2.
Department of Health.Guidelines for Pre-test Discussion on HIV Testing.London: Department of Health, 1996.
3.
Intercollegiate Working Party.Reducing Mother to Child Transmission of HIV Infection in the United Kingdom.London: Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health, 1998.
4.
ConnorE, SperlingR, GelberR, KiselevP, ScottG, O'SullivanM.Reduction of maternal—infant transmission of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 with zidovudine treatment.N Engl J Med1994; 331: 1173–80.
5.
DunnD, NewellM-L, AdesA, PeckhamC.Risk of human immuno-deficency virus type 1 transmission through breastfeeding.Lancet1992; 340: 585–8.
6.
HudsonCN.Commentary: elective caesarean section for HIV seropositivity.Lancet (in press).
7.
Department of Health.Changing Childbirth.London: HMSO, 1993.
8.
Stephenson JM, Griffioen A and the Study Group for the Medical Research Council Collaborative Study of Women with HIV.The effect of HIV diagnosis on reproductive experience.AIDS1996; 10: 1683–7.
9.
ThorneC, NewellM-L, DunnD, PeckhamC.Characteristics of pregnant HIV-1 infected women in Europe. European Collaborative Study.AIDS Care1996; 8: 33–42.
10.
GibbDM, MacDonaghSE, TookeyPAUptake of interventions to reduce mother-to-child transmission of HIV in the United Kingdom and Ireland.AIDS1997; 11: F53–F58.
11.
HeathRB, GrintPCA, HardimanAE.Anonymous testing of women attending antenatal clinics for evidence of infection with HIV.Lancet1988; i: 1394.
12.
KrasinskiK, BorokowskyW, BebenrothD, MooreT.Failure of voluntary testing for human immunodeficiency virus to identify infected parturient women in a high risk population.N Engl J Med1988; 318: 185.
13.
SherrL.Tomorrow's era: gender, psychology and HIV infection. In: AIDS as a Gender Issue: Psychological Perspectives.London: Taylor & Francis, 1996: 16–45.
14.
Unlinked Anonymous HIV Surveys Steering Group.Unlinked Anonymous HIV Prevalence Monitoring Programme: England and Wales. Data to the End of 1996.London: Department of Health, 1997.
15.
TookeyPA, GibbDM, AdesAEPerformance of antenatal HIV screening strategies in the UK.J Med Screening1998; 5: 133–6.
16.
DavisonCF, HollandFJ, NewellM-L, HudsonCN, PeckhamCS.Screening for HIV infection in pregnancy.AIDS Care1993; 5: 135–40.
17.
World Guide.Oxford: New Internationalist Publications, 1997/1998.
18.
National Study of HIV in Pregnancy.Royal College of Obstetricians & Gynaecologists Newsletter, 1998: 37.
19.
ChrystieIL, PalmerSJ, KenneyA, BanatvalaJE.HIV seroprevalence among women attending antenatal clinics in London.Lancet1992; 339: 364.
20.
Royal College of Obstetricians & Gynaecologists.Working Party Report on HIV Infection in Maternity Care and Gynaecology.London: RCOG, 1996.
21.
HawkenJ, ChardT, CosteloeK, JeffriesDJ, HudsonCN.Risk factors for HIV infection overlooked on routine antenatal care.J R Soc Med1995; 88: 634–6.
22.
HawkenJ, ChardT, CosteloeKRisk identification for HIV infection in an inner London antenatal population.Eur J Obstet Gynaecol Reprod Biol1994; 55: 141–4.
23.
SimpsonWM, JohnstoneFD, GoldbergDJ, HartGJ.Antenatal HIV testing: assessment of a routine voluntary approach.BMJ (in press).
24.
MacDonaghSE, MastersJ, HelpsBA, TookeyPA, AdesAE, GibbD.Descriptive survey of antenatal HIV testing in London: policy, uptake, and detection.BMJ1996; 313: 533–4.
25.
MacDonaghSE, MastersJ, HelpsBA, TookeyPA, GibbD.Why are antenatal HIV policies in London failing?Br J Midwifery1996; 4: 466–70.