ChamberlainGVP ed. British Births 1970.London: Heinemann,1970.
2.
PearsonJ In: BeardRW, ed. Scientific Meeting of RCOG.London: in RCOG library archives, 1977.
3.
GoodlinR.History of fetal monitoringAm J Obstet Gynecol1979: 133: 323–53.
4.
SteerPJ. Intrapartum monitoring. In: StuddJ, ed. Progress in Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol II. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 1994.
5.
NeilsonJP. EFM alone vs intermittent auscultation in labour. Pregnancy and childbirth module. In: EnkinMW, KeirseM.J.N.C., RenfrewMJ, NeilsonJP, eds. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Review No. 03298, 4 May 1994.
6.
VintzileosAM, NochimsonDJ, GuzmanER, KnuppelRA, LakeM, SchifrinBS. Intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring versus intermittent auscultation: a meta-analysis.Obstet Gynecol1995; 85: 149–55.
7.
GunnAK, WoodMC. The amplification and recording of fetal heart sounds.Proc R Soc Med1952; 45: 85–91.
8.
PinkertonJHM. Kergaradec, friend of Laennec and pioneer of fetal auscultation.Proc R Soc Med1968; 62: 477–83.
9.
PinkertonJHM. The telltale heart.Transcript of the Smellie Oration Read to the Glasgow Obstetrics and Gynaecology Society, 11 October 1978.
10.
WalkerN.The case for conservatism in management of fetal distress.BMJ1959; ii: 1221–6.
11.
HonEH, HessOW. The clinical value of fetal electrocardiographyAm J Obstet Gynecol1960; 79: 1012–23.
12.
HonEH, LeeST. The fetal electrocardiogram. (I) The electrocardiogram of the dying fetus.Am J Obstet Gynecol1963; 87: 804–13.
13.
HuntingfordPJ. A direct approach to the study of the foetus.Lancet1964; i: 95–9.
14.
BeardRWThe effect of stress on the acid base status of the fetus. MD thesis, Cambridge, 1971.
15.
HonEH, QuilliganEJ. Electronic evaluation of fetal heart rate: IX, Further observations of ‘pathologic’ fetal bradycardia.Clin Obstet Gynecol1968; 2: 145.
16.
Caldeyro-BarciaR, Mendez-BauerC, PoseiroJ In: CassaisED, ed. The Heart and Circulation in the Newborn and Infant.New York: Grune & Stratton, 7.
17.
MacraeDJ. Monitoring the heart of the fetus and the newborn.Lancet1959; ii: 266–9.
18.
SmythCN. The place of fetal phonocardiography in the labour ward. Proceedings of Symposium into Physical Methods of Measurement in Obstetrics and Gynaecology held at Department of Midwifery, University of St Andrew's. In: Walker J, MacNaughton M. eds. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw1962; 69: 1033.
19.
BellG.A short history of fetal electrocardiography. Proceedings of Symposium held at Department of Midwifery, University of St Andrew's. In: WalkerJ, MacNaughtonM, eds. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw1962; 69: 1029.
20.
HellmanLM. Electronics on obstetrics and gynaecologyJ Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw1965; 72: 896–906.
21.
HuntingfordPJ, PendletonHJ. The clinical application of cardiotocography.J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw1969; 76: 586–95.
22.
GillmerMDG, CombeD.Intrapartum fetal monitoring practice in the United Kingdom.Br J Obstet Gynaecol1979; 86: 753–8.
23.
SimmonsSC. Organisation of fetal intensive care.Clin Obstet Gynaecol1974; 1: 217–40.
24.
LundströmPNursing Mirror 23 January, 1970.
25.
SureauC.The clinical significance of electronic methods for monitoring the fetal heart: summary of the Chairman. In: HuntingfordPJ, HuterKA, SalingE, eds. Perinatal medicine: 1st European Congress, Berlin.Stuttgart: Thieme,1969: 109–12.
TiptonRH, ShelleyTS. An index of fetal welfare in labour.J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw1971; 78: 702–6.
28.
EdingtonPT, SibandaJ, BeardRW. 1975 Influence on clinical practice of routine fetal monitoring.BMJ1975; iii: 341–3.
29.
TiptonRH, LewisBV. Induction of labour and perinatal mortality.BMJ1975; i: 391.
30.
JohnstoneFD, CampbellDM, HughesGJ. Has continuous intrapartum monitoring made any impact on fetal outcome?Lancet1978; i: 1298–1300.
31.
ChalmersI, ZlosnikJE, JohnsKA, CampbellH.Obstetric practice and outcome of pregnancy in Cardiff residents 1965–73.BMJ1976; i: 735–8.
32.
BeardRW. Proceedings of 2nd Study Group of the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologist. In: ClaytonS, BeardRW, eds. Methods for Monitoring the Fetus in Pregnancy and Labour.London: RCOG,1971.
33.
WhitfieldCRSymposium of Fetal Monitoring.London: RCOG,1970.
34.
BeardRW In: BeardRW, CampbellS, eds. Proceedings of the Scientific Meeting of the RCOG.London: RCOG, 1977: 11.
35.
CurranJT In: ClaytonS, BeardR, eds. Proceedings of 2nd Study Group of the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologist.London: RCOG, 1971: 209.
RenouP, WoodC.Interpretation of the continuous fetal heart rate record.Clin Obstet Gynaecol1974; 1: 191–216.
38.
CurranJT In: ClaytonS, BeardR, eds. Proceedings of the 2nd Study Group of the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologist.London: RCOG, 1971: 224.
39.
ColeRA, HowiePW, MacnaughtonMC. Elective induction of labour. A randomised prospective trial.Lancet1975; i: 767–70.
40.
RobinsonJ.Elective induction of labour [Letter].Lancet1975; i: 1088.
41.
CoxBS. Elective induction of labour [Letter].Lancet1975; i: 242.
42.
RobinsonJ.Elective induction of labour [Letter].Lancet1975; i: 1242.
43.
BeardR, BrudenellL, FerozeS, ClaytonS.Intensive care of the high risk fetus in labour.J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw1971; 78: 822–93.
44.
AIMS Newsletter September, 1975.
45.
AIMS Newsletter January, 1976.
46.
TurnbullAC In: ChardT, RichardsM, eds. Benefits and Hazards of the New Obstetrics.Philadelphia: Lippincott,1978.
47.
AIMS Newsletter, April 1977.
48.
HaverkampAD, ThompsonHE, McFeeJG, CetruloC.The evaluation of continuous fetal heart rate monitoring in high risk pregnancy.Am J Obstet Gynecol1976; 125: 310–20.
49.
HaverkampAD, OrleansM, LangendorferS, McFeeJ, MurphyJ, ThompsonHE. A controlled trial of the differential effects of intrapartum monitoring.Am J Obstet Gynecol1979; 134: 399–412.
50.
NeilsonJP. EFM vs intermittent auscultation in labour. Pregnancy and childbirth module, In: EnkinMW, KeirseM.J.N.C., RenfrewMJ, NeilsonJP, eds. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews: Review no. 03884, 4 May 1994.