Clinicians commonly face an ethical conundrum when the patient declines a treatment they believe to be necessary. The decision, whether to give or to withhold treatment, may also have legal repercussions. Two illustrative cases are presented. Although the Mental Health Act (1983) is concerned with treatment of mental disorder, treatments for physical disorders may be given in certain circumstances if the patient is deemed to lack the competence to understand the issues involved in the decision, and treatment is deemed to be in their best interests.
References
1.
Mental Health Act.London: HMSO, 1983.
2.
Department of Health.Code of Practice.London: HMSO, 1990.
3.
GostinL.A Practical Guide To Mental Health Law.London: MIND,1983.
4.
JellyM.Common Law and the ‘Code of Practice’—a commentary.Psychiatr Bull1990; 14: 449–51.
5.
GoffL J.. Collins versus Willcox. (1984): 3 All ER 374.
6.
SullivanD.The incapable patient and the law. In: HirschSR, HarrisJ eds. Consent and the Incompetent Patient.London: Royal College of Psychiatrists,1988: 1–7.
7.
WilsonP.Legal issues.BMJ1995; 311: 116–17.
8.
ThorpeJ In: Re C (1993) NLJR 1642.
9.
BeauchampTL, ChildressJF. Principles of Biomedical Ethics, 4th edn.Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994.
10.
BrownP.Ethical aspects of drug treatment. In: BlochS, ChodoffP eds. Psychiatric Ethics.New York: Oxford University Press1993: 174–5.
11.
Airedale NHS Trust versus Bland1993: 1 All ER 821.
