GershMR.Electrotherapy in Rehabilitation.Philadelphia: FA Davis Company, 1992
2.
AdrianED, BronkDW.The discharge of impulses in motor nerve fibers.J Physiol1928; 66: 81–101.
3.
AndrewsJM.Neuromuscular reeducation of the hemiplegic with the aid of the electromyograph.Arch Phys Ed Rehabil1964; 45: 530
4.
MimsHW.Electromyography in clinical practice.South Med J1956; 49: 804
5.
MarinacciAA, HornandeM.Electromyogram in neuromuscular reeducation.Bull Neurol Soc1960; 25: 57
6.
WolfSL.Electromyographic biofeedback applications to stroke patients: a critical review.Phys Ther1983; 63: 1448–55.
7.
DeWeerdtWJG, HarrisonMA.The efficacy of electromyographic feedback for stroke patients: a critical review of the main literature.Physiotherapy1986; 72: 108–18.
8.
InceLP, LeonMS, ChristidisD.EMG biofeedback with the upper extremity: a critical review of experimental foundation of clinical treatment of the disabled.Rehabil Psychol1987; 32: 77–91.
9.
SchleenbakerRE, MainousAG.Electromyobiofeedback for neuromuscular reeducation in the hemiplegic stroke patient: a meta-analysis.Arch Phys Med Rehabil1993; 74: 1301–4.
10.
MorelandJ, ThomsonMA.Efficacy of electromyographic biofeedback compared with conventional physical therapy for upper extremity function following stroke: a research overview and meta-analysis.Phys Ther1994; 74: 534–47.
11.
GlanzM, KlawanskyS, StasonWBiofeedback therapy in poststroke rehabilitation: a meta-analysis of the randomized controlled trials.Arch Phys Med Rehabil1995; 76: 508–15.
12.
KloseKJ, NeedhamBM, SchmidtD, BrotonJG, GreenBA.An assessment of the contribution of electromyographic biofeedback as an adjunct therapy in the physical training of spinal cord injured persons.Arch Phys Med Rehabil1993; 74: 435–56.
13.
CleelandCS.Biofeedback and other behavioral techniques in the treatment of disorders of voluntary movement. In: BasmajianJV ed. Biofeedback: Principals and Practice For Clinicians, 3rd edn.Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1989
14.
BasmajianJV.Biofeedback in rehabilitation: a review of principles and practices.Arch Phys Med Rehabil1981; 62: 469–75.
15.
BamfordJ, SandercockP, DennisMA prospective study of acute cerebrovascular disease in the community: the Oxfordshire community stroke project, 1981-86. 1. Methodology, demography and incident cases of first ever stroke.J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiat1988; 51: 1373–80.
16.
Oxfordshire Community Stroke Project. Incidence of stroke in Oxfordshire: first year's experience with a community stroke register.BMJ1983; 287: 713–17
17.
Office of Health Economics Statement.The Treatment of Stroke.London: OHE, 1988
18.
King's Fund Consensus Conference.Treatment of stroke.BMJ1988; 297: 126–28
19.
DennisM, WarlowC.Strategy for stroke.BMJ1991; 303: 636–8.
20.
BasmajianJ.Research foundations of EMG biofeedback in rabilitation.Biofeedback Self-Reg1988; 13: 275–97.
MarzukPM.Biofeedback for neuromuscular disorders.Ann Intern Med1985; 102: 854–8.
23.
WolfeSI, EdwardsDI, ShutterLA.Concurrent assessment of muscle activity (CAMA): a precedural approach to assess treatment goals.Phys Ther1986; 66: 218–24.
24.
WinsteenCJ.Knowledge of results and motor learning—implications for physical therapy.Phys Ther1991; 71: 140–9.
25.
WisselJ, EbersbachG, GutjahrL, DahlkeF.Treating chronic hemiparesis with modified biofeedback.Arch Phys Med Rehabil1989; 70: 612–17.
26.
FinklerSA.The distinction between cost and charges.Ann Intern Med1982; 96: 102–9.
27.
BasmajianJ.Biofeedback in rehabilitation: a review of principles and practices.Arch Phys Med Rehabil1981; 62: 469–75.
28.
DennisM, LanghorneP.So stroke units save lives: where do we go from here?BMJ1994; 309: 1273–7.
29.
HewerRL.Rehabilitation after stroke.Q J Med1990; 76: 659–74.
30.
ShahaniBY, ConnorsL, MohrJP.Electromyographic audiovisual feedback training effect on the motor performance in patients with lesions of the central nervous system.Arch Phys Med Rehabil1977; 58: 519
31.
WolfSL, BakerMP, KellyKL.EMG biofeedback in stroke: effect of patient characteristics.Arch Phys Med Rehabil1979; 60: 96–102.
32.
WolfSL, BakerMP, KellyKL.EMG biofeedback in stroke: 1-year follow up on the effect of patient characteristics.Arch Phys Med Rehabil1980,61: 351–5
33.
HurdWW, PegramV, NepomucenoC.Comparison of actual and simulated biofeedback in the treatment of hemiplegic patients.Am J Phys Med1980; 59: 73–82.
34.
ErnstEE.A review of stroke rehabilitation and physiotherapy.Stroke1990; 21: 1081–5
35.
FernandoCK, BasmajianJV.Biofeedback in physical medicine and rehabilitation.Biofeedback Self-Reg1978; 3: 435–55.
DuncanPW, BadkeMB.Stroke Rehabilitation.Chicago: Year Book Medical Publishers Inc, 1987
38.
SackettDL, HaynesRB, GuyattG, TugwellP.Clinical Epidemiology: a Basic Science For Clinicians, 2nd edn.Boston: Little Brown & Co, 1991
39.
OxmanAD, GuyattGH.Guidelines for reading literature reviews.Can Med Assoc J1988; 138: 697–703.
40.
MulrowCD.The medical review article: state of the science.Ann Intern Med1987; 106: 485–8.
41.
The Cochrane Collaboration.Oxford, England: UK Cochrane Centre, National Health Service Research and Development Programme, 1994
42.
OxmanAD, SackettDL, GuyattGHfor the Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. Users' guide to the medical literature, I: how to get started.JAMA1993; 270: 2093–5.
43.
ChalmersTC.A method of assessing the quality of randomized control trials.Control Clin Trials1981; 2: 31–49.
44.
EmersonJD, BurdickE, HoaglinDC, MostellerF, ChalmersTC.An empirical study of the possible relation of treatment differences to quality scores in controlled randomized clinical trials.Control Clin Trials1990; 11: 339–52.
45.
WolfSL, Binder-MacleodSA.Electromyographic biofeedback applications to the hemiplegic patient: changes in upper extremity neuromuscular and functional status.Phys Ther1983; 63: 1393–403.
46.
WolfSL, Binder-MacleodSA.Electromyographic biofeedback applications to the hemiplegic patient: changes in lower extremity neuromuscular and functional status.Phys Ther1983; 63: 1404–14.
47.
ChalmersTC, CelanoP, SacksHS, SmithHJr.Bias in treatment assignment in controlled clinical trials.N Engl J Med1983; 309: 1358–61.
48.
DickersinK, HewittP, MuthLPerusing the literature: comparison of MEDLINE searching with a perinatal trials database.Control Clin Trials1985; 6: 306–17.
49.
GlassGV, McGawB, SmithML.Meta-analysis in social research.Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1981
50.
RossiP, WrightS.Evaluation research: an assessment of theory, practice and politics.Eval Q1977; 1: 5–52.
51.
PillemerDB.Conceptual issues in research synthesis.J Special Ed1984; 18: 27–40.
52.
IntisoD, SantilliV, GrassoMG, RossiR, CarusoI.Rehabilitation of walking with electromyographic biofeedback in foot-drop after stroke.Stroke1994; 25: 1189–92.
53.
McDonaldCJ.Medical heuristics: the silent adjudicators of clinical practice.Ann Intern Med1996; 124: 56–62.
54.
BorzakS, RidkerP.Discordance between meta-analyses and large scale randomized controlled trials.Ann Intern Med1995; 123: 873–7.