There is near consensus that the US health care system requires reform. Only a quarter of the American public has faith in the current system. Health care was one of the major issues considered in the 1992 US presidential election and the search for innovative solutions has transcended administrations.
Jajich-TohCRoperBW. Americans' views on health care: A study in contradictions. Hlth Affairs1990;9(4):149–57.
2.
BrookRHLohrK. Will we need to ration effective health care?Issues Sci Techn1986;3:68–77.
3.
RelmanA. Confronting the Crisis in Health Care. Techn Rev1989;July:31–40.
4.
Health Care Financing Administration, Office of the Actuary. Expenditures and percent of gross national product for national health expenditures by private and public funds, hospital care, and physician services: Calendar years 1960–87. Hlth Care Financ Rev1988;10(Winter):2.
5.
ShortPF. National medical expenditure survey: Estimates of the uninsured population, calendar year 1987 — data summary 2. Rockville, MD: National Center for Health Services Research and Health Care Technology Assessment, 1990.
6.
ShortPFMonheitABeauregardK. National medical expenditure survey: a profile of uninsured Americans: Research findings, Vol 1. Rockville, MD: National Center for Health Services Research and Health Care Technology Assessment, 1989.
7.
KitzhaberJ. The Oregon basic health services Act. Salem, Oregon: Oregon State Senate, 1990.
8.
BrookRHParkREChassinMRKosekoffJKeeseyJSolomonDH. Carotid endasterectomy for elderly patients: Predicting complications. Ann Intern Med1990;113:747–53.
9.
HadornDCBrookRH. The health care resource allocation debate. Refining our terms. J Am Med Assoc1991;266:3328–31.
10.
KaplanRM. The Hippocratic predicament affordability, access, and accountability in health care. San Diego, USA: San Diego Academic Press, 1993.
11.
KaplanRMAndersonJP. A general health policy model: Update and applications. Hlth Serv Res1988;23:203–35.
12.
HadornDC. Setting health care priorities in Oregon: Cost-effectiveness meets the rule of rescue. J Am Med Assoc1991;266:2218–25.
13.
WeinsteinMCStasonWB. Foundations of cost-effectiveness analysis for health and medical practice. N Engl J Med1977;296:716–21.
14.
WeinsteinMCStasonWB. Hypertension: A policy perspective. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1976.
15.
Office of Technology Assessment, United States Congress. A review of selected federal vaccine and immunization policies: Based on case studies of pneumococcal vaccine. Washington DC: US Government Printing Office, 1979.
16.
RussellL. Is prevention better than cure?Washington: The Brookings Institution, 1986.
17.
WilliamsA. The importance of quality of life in policy decisions. In: WalkerSRosserR, eds. Quality of life-assessment and application. London: MTP Press, 1988:279–90.
18.
DrummondMFStoddardGLTorranceGW. Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987.
19.
MaynardA. Economic issues in HIV management. In: MaynardA, eds. Economic aspects of HIV management. London: Colwood House Medical Publications, 1991:6–12.
20.
TorranceGW. Measurement of health state utilities for economic appraisal: A review. J Hlth Econ1986;5:1.
21.
TorranceGW. Utility approach to measuring health-related quality of life. J Chronic Dis1987;40:593–600.
22.
RichardsonJ. Economic assessment in health care: Theory and practice. Monash University: National Center for Health Program Evaluation, 1991.
23.
PatrickDLEricksonP. Health status and health policy: Allocating resources to health care. Boston: Cambridge University Press, 1993.
24.
FriesJFGreenLWLevineS. Health promotion and the compression of morbidity. Lancet1989;i:481–3.
