YoungJ.Z.. Why do we have two brains? In: MountcastleV.B., ed. Interhemispheric relations and cerebral dominance.Baltimore, MA: Johns Hopkins Press, 1962: 7–24
2.
CorballisM.C., BealeI.L.. The psychology of left and right.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1976
3.
BodianD.. Discussion first session, A. In: MountcastleV.B., ed. Interhemispheric relations and cerebral dominance.Baltimore, MA: Johns Hopkins Press, 1962: 25–6
4.
FrostG.T.. Tool behavior and the origins of laterality.J Hum Evol1980; 9: 447–59
5.
LevyJ.. Interhemispheric collaboration: Single-mindedness in the asymmetric brain. In: BestC.T., ed. Hemispheric function and collaboration in the child.New York: Academic Press, 1985: 11–31
6.
BeaumontJ.G., ed. Divided visual field studies of cerebral organisation.London: Academic Press, 1982
7.
BolesD.B.. The effects of display and report order asymmetries on lateralized word recognition.Brain Lang1985; 26: 106–16
8.
KirsnerK., SchwartzS.. Words and hemifields: Do the hemispheres enjoy equal opportunity?Brain Cogn1986; 5: 354–61
9.
SchwartzS., KirsnerK.. Behavioral or hemispheric asymmetry: Is there a default option?Brain Lang1986; 5: 377–84
10.
BrydenM.P.. On the possible dangers of using horizontal word displays in visual field studies.Brain Cogn1986; 5: 362–8
11.
HelligeJ.B.. Visual laterality and the acuity gradient: potential artifacts and control procedures.Brain Lang1986; 5: 369–76
12.
SergentJ.. The role of the input in visual hemispheric asymmetries.Psychol Bull1983; 93: 481–512
13.
HelligeJ.B., SergentJ.. Role of task factors in visual field asymmetries.Brain Cogn1986; 5: 200–22
14.
SergentJ., HelligeJ.B.. Role of input factors in visual-field asymmetries.Brain Cogn1986; 5: 174–99
15.
KitterleF.L.. Psychophysics of lateral tachistoscopic presentation.Brain Cogn1986; 5: 131–62
16.
CorballisM.C.. Fresh fields and postures new: A discussion paper.Brain Cogn1986; 5: 240–52
17.
DrakeR.A., BinghamB.R.. Induced lateral orientation and persuasibility.Brain Cogn1985; 4: 156–64
18.
LevyJ., KueckL.. A right hemispatial field advantage on a verbal free-vision task.Brain Lang1986; 27: 24–37
19.
BeaumontJ.G.. Aesthetic preference and lateral dominance: the importance of peripheral visual asymmetries.Neuropsychologist1985; 23: 103–13
20.
GazzanigaM.S., LadavasE.. Disturbances in spatial attention following lesion or disconnection of the right parietal lobe. In: JeannerodM., ed. Neurophysiological and neuropsychological aspects of spatial neglect.Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1987: 203–14
21.
TrevarthenC.. Analysis of cerebral activities that generate and regulate consciousness in commissurotomy patients. In: DimondS.J., BeaumontJ.G., eds. Hemisphere function in the human brain.London: Elek Science, 1974: 235–63
22.
EhrlichmanH., WeinbergerA.. Lateral eye movements and hemispheric asymmetry: A critical review.Psychol Bull1978; 85: 1080–101
23.
BeaumontJ.G., YoungA.W., McManusI.C.. The concept of hemisphericity: a critical review.Cogn Neuropsychol1984; 1: 191–212
24.
HiscockM.. Lateral eye movements and dual-task performance. In: HannayH.J., ed. Experimental techniques in human neuropsychology.New York: Oxford University Press, 1986: 264–308
25.
BeaumontJ.G.. The EEG and task performance: a tutorial review. In: GaillardA.W.K., RitterW., eds. Tutorials in ERP research: endogenous components.Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1983: 385–406
26.
GevinsA.S.. Quantitative human neurophysiology. In: HannayH.J., ed. Experimental techniques in human neuropsychology.New York: Oxford University Press, 1986: 419–56
27.
SquiresN.K., OlloC.. Human evoked potential techniques: Possible applications to neuropsychology. In: HannayH.J., ed. Experimental techniques in human neuropsychology.New York: Oxford University Press, 1986: 386–418
28.
AnnettM.. Left, right, hand and brain: the right shift theory.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1985