DoddsC.Michael Williams's contribution to industrial hygiene with reference to cancer. Proc R Soc Med1964; 57: 1165–9
2.
BoylandE.A chemist's view of cancer prevention. Proc R Soc Med1967; 60: 93–9
3.
CaseR.A.M.Some environmental carcinogens. Proc R Soc Med1969; 62: 1061–6
4.
WalpoleA.L., WilliamsM.H.C.Aromatic amines as carcinogens in industry. Br Med Bull1958; 14: 141–5
5.
WalpoleA.L., WilliamsM.H.C., RobertsD.C.The carcinogenic action of 4–aminodiphenyl and 3: 2'-dimethyl-4–aminodiphenyl. Br J Ind Med1952; 9: 255–63
6.
WalpoleA.L., WilliamsM.H.C., RobertsD.C.Tumours of the urinary bladder in dogs after ingestion of 4–aminodiphenyl. Br J Ind Med1954; 11: 105–9
7.
HeuperW.C.Environmental carcinogenesis and cancers. Cancer Res1961; 21: 842–57
8.
AshbyJ.The distinction between genetic and non-genetic mechanisms in chemical carcinogenesis. In: ZbindenG., CohadonF., DetailleJ.Y., MazueG. eds. Current Problems in Drug Toxicology.Paris: Libby Eurotext, 1983.
9.
AmesB.N., DurstenW.E., YamasakiE., LeeF.D.Carcinogens are mutagens: A simple test system combining liver homogenates for activation and bacteria for detection. Proc Natl Acad Sci (USA)1975; 70: 2281–5
10.
PurchaseI.F.H., LongstaffE., AshbyJ.Evaluation of six short term tests for detecting organic chemical carcinogens and recommendations for their use. Nature1976; 264: 624–7
11.
PurchaseI.F.H., LongstaffE., AshbyJ.An evaluation of 6 short-term tests for detecting organic chemical carcinogens. Br J Cancer1978; 37: 873–959
12.
AshbyJ.A., PurchaseI.F.H.The selection of appropriate chemical class controls for use with short-term tests for potential carcinogenicity. Ann Occup Hyg1977; 20: 297–301
13.
PurchaseI.F.H.An appraisal of predictive tests for carcinogenicity. Mutat Res1982; 99: 53–71
14.
HollsteinM., McCannJ., AngelosantoF.A., NicholsW.Short-term tests for carcinogens and mutagens. Mutat Res1979; 65: 133–226
15.
De SerresF.J., AshbyJ.Evaluation of short-term tests for carcinogens.Report of the international collaborative program. New York: Elsevier/North Holland, 1981
16.
AshbyJ., de SerresF.J., DraperM.Evaluation of short-term tests for carcinogens. Report of the International Programme on Chemical Safety's Collaborative study on in vitro assays. New York: Elsevier/North Holland, 1985
17.
AmesB.N., HooperK.Does carcinogenic potency correlate with mutagenic potency in the Ames assay?Nature1978; 274: 19–20
18.
AshbyJ., StylesJ.A.Does carcinogenic potency correlate with mutagenic potency in the Ames assay?Nature1978; 271: 452–5
19.
AshbyJ., StylesJ.A.Factors influencing mutagenic potency in vitro. Nature1978; 274: 20–2
20.
PurchaseI.F.H.A comparison of the potency of the mutagenic effect of chemicals in short-term tests with their carcinogenic effect in rodent carcinogenicity experiments. In: VoukV.B., ButlerG.C., HoelD.G., PeakallD.B. eds. Methods for estimating risk of chemical injury: human and non-human biota and ecosystems.New York: John Wiley1985: 247–269
AshbyJ.The genotoxicity of sodium saccharin and sodium chloride in relation to their cancer promoting properties. Food Cosmetics Toxicol, 1985; 23: 507–19
23.
ShelbyM.D., StasiewiczS.Chemicals showing no evidence of carcinogenicity in long-term, two-species rodent studies: The need for short-term test data. Environ Mutagen1984; 6: 871–8
24.
AshbyJ., PurchaseI.F.H.Significance of the genotoxic activities observed in vitro for 35 of 70 NTP non-carcinogens. Environ Mutagen1985; 7: 747–58
25.
AshbyJ., TennantR.W.Chemical structure, Salmonella mutagenicity and extent of carcinogenicity as indicators of genotoxic carcinogenesis among 222 chemicals tested in rodents by the US NCI/NTP. Mutat Res1988; 204: 17–115
26.
GrassoP., GangolliS.D., GolbergL., HoosenJ.Physio-chemical and other factors determining local sarcoma production by food additives. Food Cosmetics Toxicol1971; 9: 463–75
27.
WeilC.S., CarpenterC.P., SmythH.F.Urinary bladder response to diethylene glycol. Arch Environ Health1965; 11: 569–81
28.
NashJ.A., KingL.J., LockE.A., GreenT.The metabolism and disposition of hexachloro-1: 3-butadiene in the rat and its relevance to nephrotoxicity. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol1984; 73: 124–137
29.
GreenT., OdumJ.Structure/activity studies of the nephrotoxic and mutagenic action of cysteine conjugates of chloro- and fluoroalkenes. Chem Biol Interact, 1985; 54: 15–31
30.
ElcombeC.R., RoseM.S., PrattI.S.Biochemical, histological, and ultrastructural changes in rat and mouse liver following the administration of trichloroethylene: Possible relevance to species differences in hepatocarcinogenicity. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol1985; 79: 365–76
31.
ElcombeC.R.Species differences in carcinogenicity and peroxisome proliferation due to trichloroethylene: A biochemical human hazard assessment. Arch Toxicol (suppl) 1985; 8: 6–17
32.
ECETOC (1987). The assessment of the carcinogenic hazard for human beings exposed to methylene chloride. Technical Report No 26. Brussels: ECETOC, 1987
33.
ScottT.S., WilliamsM.H.C.The control of industrial bladder tumours: a code of working practice recommended by the British Dyestuffs Industry for the manufacture and use of products causing tumours of the bladder. Br J Ind Med1957; 14: 150–63