Cancer Statistics: Registrations England and Wales 1982.London: HMSO, 1985
2.
Mortality Statistics: Cause England and Wales 1984.London: HMSO, 1985
3.
Registrar General's Annual Report for Scotland 1984.London: HMSO, 1985
4.
GoligherJ.. Results of operations for large bowel cancer. In: DeCosseJ.J., ed. Large bowel cancer.Edinburgh, New York: Churchill Livingstone, 1981: 154–65
5.
GillP.G., MorrisP.J.. The survival of patients with colorectal cancer treated in a regional hospital.Br J Surg1978; 65: 17–20
6.
DukesC.E.. The classification of cancer of the rectum.J Pathol1938; 35: 223–32
7.
TurnbullR.B., KyleK., WatsonF.R., SprattJ.. Cancer of the colon: the influence of the no-touch isolation technique on survival rates.Ann Surg1967; 160: 420–5
8.
MossA.A., ThoeniR.F., SchnyderP., MargulisA.R.. Value of computed tomography in the detection and staging of recurrent rectal carcinomas.J Comput Assist Tomogr1981; 5: 870–4
ThoeniR.F., MossA.A., SchnyderP., MargulisA.R.. Detection and staging of primary rectal and rectosigmoid cancer by computed tomography.Radiology1981; 141: 135–8
11.
van WaesPFGM, KoehlerP.R., FeldbergM.A.M.. Management of rectal carcinoma: impact of computed tomography.AJR1983; 140: 1137–42
12.
GrabbeE., LierseW., WinklerR.. The perirectal fascia: morphology and use in staging of rectal carcinoma.Radiology1983; 149: 241–6
13.
AdalsteinssonB., GlimeliusB., GraffmanS., HemmingssonA., PahlmanL.. Computed tomography in staging of rectal carcinoma.Acta Radiol (Diagn) (Stockh)1985; 26: 45–55
14.
ThompsonW., HalvorsenR.A., FosterW.L., RobertsL., GibbonsR.. Preoperative and postoperative CT staging of rectosigmoid carcinoma.AJR1986; 146: 703–10
15.
KorobkinM., CallenP.W., FischA.E.. Computed tomography of the pelvis and retroperitoneum.Radiol Clin North Am1979; 17: 301–19
16.
DixonA.K., MorsonB.C., York MasonA.. Pre-operative computed tomography of carcinoma of the rectum.Br J Radiol1981; 54: 655–9
17.
MossA.A., SchrumpfJ., SchnyderP., KorobkinM., ShimshakR.R.. Computed tomography of focal hepatic lesions: a blind clinical evaluation of the effect of contrast enhancement.Radiology1979; 131: 427–30
18.
BernardinoM.E., ErwinB.C., SteinbergH.V., BaumgarterB.R., TorresW.E., Gedgaudas-McCleesR.K.. Delayed hepatic CT scanning: increased confidence and improved detection of hepatic metastases.Radiology1986; 159: 71–4
19.
SugarbakerP.H., VermessM., DoppmanJ.L., MillerD.L., SimonR.. Improved detection of focal lesions with computerized tomographic examination of the liver using ethiodized oil emulsion (EOE-13) liver contrast.Cancer1984; 54: 1489–95
ReznekR.H., WhiteF.E., YoungJ.W.R., Kelsey FryI.. The appearances on computed tomography after abdominoperineal resection for carcinoma of the rectum: a comparison between the normal appearances and those of recurrence.Br J Radiol1983; 56: 237–40
22.
KelvinF.M., KorobkinM., HeastonD.K., GrantJ.P., AkwariO.. The pelvis after surgery for rectal carcinoma: serial CT observations with emphasis on nonneoplastic features.AJR1983; 141: 959–64
23.
HusbandJ.E., HodsonN.J., ParsonsC.A.. The use of computed tomography in recurrent rectal tumors.Radiology1980; 134: 677–32
24.
LeesW.R., Hall-CraggsM.A., ManhireA.. Five years’ experience of fine needle aspiration biopsy: 454 consecutive cases.Clin Radiol1985; 36: 517–20