BynumWF . The History of Medicine: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008: 150.
4.
ChalmersI. Statistical theory was not the reason that randomization was used in the British Medical Research Council’s Clinical Trial of streptomycin for pulmonary tuberculosis. In: JorlandGWeiszGOpinelA (eds) Body Counts: Medical Quantification in Historical and Sociological Perspective. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s Press, 2005: 309–334.
BoothCC. Clinical research. In: BynumWFPorterR (eds) Companion Encyclopaedia of the History of Medicine. Vol 1. London: Routledge, 1993: 223.
7.
MatthewsJR.Quantification and the Quest for Medical Certainty. Princeton: University Press, 1995.
8.
StiglerS. The Seven Pillars of Statistical Wisdom. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2016: 166.
9.
YoshiokaA.Use of randomisation in the Medical Research Council’s clinical trial of streptomycin in pulmonary tuberculosis in the 1940s. BMJ1998; 317: 1220–1223.
10.
ChalmersI.Why transition from alternation to randomisation in clinical trials was made. BMJ1999; 319: 1372.
NeuhauserDProvostSMProvostLP.It is time to reconsider factorial designs: how Bradford Hill and RA Fisher shaped the standard of clinical evidence. Qual Manag Health Care2020; 29: 109–122.
13.
FisherRA.Statistical Methods for Research Workers. Edinburgh: Oliver & Boyd, 1925.
14.
FisherRA.The Design of Experiments. Edinburgh: Oliver & Boyd, 1935.
15.
ArmitageP.Fisher, Bradford Hill, and randomization. Int J Epidemiol2003; 32: 925–928.
HillAB.Medical ethics and controlled trials. BMJ1963; 1: 1043–1049.
27.
NardiniC.The ethics of clinical trials. E-cancer2014; 8: 387–395.
28.
OpinelATröhlerUGluudC, et al. Commentary: The evolution of methods to assess the effects of treatments, illustrated by the development of treatments for diphtheria, 1825–1918. Int J Epidemiol2011; 42: 662–676.
HeibergP.Studier over den statistiske undersøgelsesmetode som hjælpemiddel ved terapeutiske undersøgelser [Studies on the statistical study design as an aid in therapeutic trials]. Bibliotek for Læger1897; 89: 1–40. See www.jameslindlibrary.org/heiberg-p-1897 (accessed 17 December 2025).
SchulzKFGrimesDA (2002). Generation of allocation sequences in randomised trials: chance, not choice. Lancet359: 515–519.
35.
BennettDJ.Randomness. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, chapter 9, 1998.
36.
KnuthDE.The Art of Computer Programming. Vol. 2, 3rd ed.Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1997; pp. 149–189.
37.
MainlandD.Statistical methods in medical research. I. Qualitative statistics (enumeration data). Can J Res1948; 26: 1–166. See https://www.jameslindlibrary.org/mainland-d-1948/ (accessed 17 December 2025).
LilienfeldAM.Ceteris paribus: the evolution of the clinical trial. Bulletin History Med1982; 56: 1–18.
45.
WallerLA. A note on Harold S. Diehl, randomization, and clinical trials. Controll Clin Trials1997; 18: 180–183. See https://www.jameslindlibrary.org/waller-la-1997/ (accessed 17 December 2025).
46.
WesselyS.A defence of the randomized controlled trial in mental health. BioSocieties2007; 2: 115–127.
47.
Editorial (unsigned). Mathematics and medicine. Lancet1937; 229: 31.
48.
EdwardsMV. Control and the therapeutic trial 1918-1948. MD Thesis, University of London, UK, 2004: 68–74.
HillAB.Principles of Medical Statistics. 6th ed.London: Lancet, 1955.
51.
ChalmersIHetheringtonJNewdickM, et al. The Oxford database of perinatal trials: developing a register of published reports of controlled trials. Controll Clin Trials1986; 7: 306–324.