When was randomisation first used in educational research? A brief historical methodological perspective

Forsetlund L Chalmers I Bjorndal A. When was random allocation first used to generate comparison groups in experiments to assess the effects of social interventions? Econ Innov New Technol 2007; 16: 371–384.

Hedges L Schauer J. Randomised trials in education in the USA. In Styles B Torgerson C (eds.) Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in education research – methodological debates, questions, challenges. Educ Res 2018; 60: 265–275.

Styles B Torgerson C. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in education research – methodological debates, questions, challenges. Educ Res 2018; 60: 255–264.

Cummings RA . Improvement and the Distribution of Practice. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University, 1919. See https://www.loc.gov/resource/gdcmassbookdig.improvementdistr01cumm/?st=gallery (last checked 5 August 2025).

Pearson HC. The scientific study of the teaching of spelling. J Educ Psychol 1911; 2: 241–252.

Remmers HH. A diagnostic and remedial study of potentially and actually failing students at Purdue University. Bull Purdue Univ Stud Higher Educ IX 1928; 28: 1–164.

Walters JE. Seniors as counselors. J Higher Educ 1931; 2: 446–448.

Walters JE. Measuring effectiveness of personnel counseling. Personnel J 1932; 11: 227–236.

Torgerson CJ Torgerson DJ. The need for pragmatic experimentation in educational research. Econ Innov N Technol 2007; 16: 323–330.

Moberg J Kramer M. A brief history of the cluster randomised trial design. J R Soc of Med 2015; 108: 192–198. See https://www.jameslindlibrary.org/articles/a-brief-history-of-the-cluster-randomized-trial-design/ (last checked March 2024).

Lindquist EF. Statistical Analysis in Educational Research. Boston, MA: Houghton-Mifflin, 1940. See https://www.jameslindlibrary.org/lindquist-ef-1940/ (last checked March 2024).

Chalmers I Matthews R Glasziou P Boutron I Armitage P. Trial analysis by treatment allocated or by treatment received? Origins of ‘the intention-to-treat principle’ to reduce allocation bias: Part 1. J R Soc Med 2023; 116: 343–350. See https://www.jameslindlibrary.org/articles/analysis-of-clinical-trial-by-treatment-allocated-or-by-treatment-received-applying-the-intention-to-treat-principle/ (last checked March 2024).

Chalmers I Matthews R Glasziou P Boutron I Armitage P. Trial analysis by treatment allocated or by treatment received? Origins of ‘the intention-to-treat principle’ to reduce allocation bias: Part 2. J R Soc Med 2023; 116: 386–394. See https://www.jameslindlibrary.org/articles/analysis-of-clinical-trial-by-treatment-allocated-or-by-treatment-received-applying-the-intention-to-treat-principle/ (last checked March 2024).