Reports of randomised control trials should begin and conclude with up-to-date systematic reviews of other relevant trials: a 25-year audit of the quality of trial reports

Clarke M. Doing new research? Don't forget the old. Nobody should do a trial without reviewing what is known. PLoS Medicine 2004; 1: 100–102.

Chalmers I Altman DG. How can medical journals help prevent poor medical research? Some opportunities presented by electronic publishing. Lancet 1999; 353: 490–493.

Glasziou P Altman DG Bossuyt P Boutron I Clarke M Julious S , , et al. Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research. Lancet 2014; 383: 267–276.

Moher D Hopewell S Schulz KF Montori V Gøtzsche PC Devereaux PJ , , et al. CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ 2010; 340: c869.

Donne J. Devotion upon emergent occasions. Meditation 17. Cambridge: The University Press, 1923.

Clarke M Chalmers I. Discussion sections in reports of controlled trials published in general medical journals: islands in search of continents? JAMA 1998; 280: 280–282.

Clarke M Hopewell S Chalmers I. Reports of clinical trials should begin and end with up-to-date systematic reviews of other relevant evidence: a status report. J R Soc Med 2007; 100: 187–190.

Clarke M Hopewell S Chalmers I. Clinical trials should begin and end with systematic reviews of relevant evidence: 12 years and waiting. Lancet 2010; 376: 20–21.

Clarke M Hopewell S. Many reports of randomised trials still don’t begin or end with a systematic review of the relevant evidence. J Bahrain Med Soc 2013; 24: 145–148.

Clarke M Alderson P Chalmers I. Discussion sections in reports of controlled trials published in general medical journals. JAMA 2002; 287: 2799–2801.

Nørgaard B Draborg E Andreasen J Juhl CB Yost J Brunnhuber K , , et al. Systematic reviews are rarely used to inform study design – a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Epidemiol 2022; 145: 1–13.

Draborg E Andreasen J Nørgaard B Juhl CB Yost J Brunnhuber K , , et al. Systematic reviews are rarely used to contextualise new results – a systematic review and meta-analysis of meta-research studies. Syst Rev 2022; 11: 189.

Jia Y Li B Yang Z Li F Zhao Z Wei C , et al. Trends of randomized clinical trials citing prior systematic reviews, 2007–2021. JAMA Netw Open 2023; 6: e234219.

Lund H Juhl CB Nørgaard B Draborg E Henriksen M Andreasen J , et al. Evidence-based research series-paper 2: using an evidence-based research approach before a new study is conducted to ensure value. J Clin Epidemiol 2021; 129: 158–166.

Lund H Juhl CB Nørgaard B Draborg E Henriksen M Andreasen J , et al. Evidence-based research series-paper 3: using an evidence-based research approach to place your results into context after the study is performed to ensure usefulness of the conclusion. J Clin Epidemiol 2021; 129: 167–171.

Clarke M Chalmers I. Reflections on the history of systematic reviews. BMJ Evidence-Based Med 2018; 23: 121–122.

Dotto L Kinalski MA Machado PS Pereira GKR Sarkis-Onofre R Dos Santos MBF. The mass production of systematic reviews about COVID-19: an analysis of PROSPERO records. J Evidence Based Med 2021; 14: 56–64.

Glasziou P Jones M Clarke M. Setting new research in the context of previous research: some options. BMJ Evidence-Based Med 2024; 29: 44–46.

Clarke M Brice A Chalmers I. Accumulating research: a systematic account of how cumulative meta-analyses would have provided knowledge, improved health, reduced harm and saved resources. PLoS ONE 2014; 9: e102670.

Antman EM Lau J Kupelnick B Mosteller F Chalmers TC. A comparison of results of meta-analyses of infarction. JAMA 1992; 268: 240–248.

Hahn RA Teutsch SM. Saving lives by modifying the process of science: estimated historical mortality associated with the failure to conduct routine prospective cumulative systematic reviews. Am J Biomed Sci Res 2021; 14: AJBSR.MS.ID.002052

Collins R Doll R Peto R. Ethics of clinical trials. In: Williams CJ , ed. Introducing New Treatments of Cancer: Practical, Ethical and Legal Problems. Chichester: Wiley, 1992:49–65.

Mahtani KR. All health researchers should begin their training by preparing at least one systematic review. J R Soc Med 2016; 109: 264–268.