Abstract

Social care is under increasing pressure globally. For economically developed countries, the cost pressures on long-term care services are set to grow as governments struggle to provide high-quality social care to an ageing population and a growing number of working age adults with complex needs. 1 In England in 2018/2019, 841,850 people received publicly funded long-term social care, primarily in care/nursing homes or in their own home with a government spend of £22 billion. 2 However, austerity has meant social care funding in real terms has fallen. Funding per person was at a lower level in 2019 than in 2010/2011, with an estimated funding gap of £1.5 billion. This funding shortfall, projected to be at least £2.7 billion by 2023/2024, means unmet need (i.e. people going without care and support) is a significant concern. 3 Issues around workforce sustainability and a fragmented, means-tested social care system further challenge the delivery of social care. 4 Healthcare, too, is confronted with the challenge of delivering safe, effective, quality care in the face of constrained budgets and, with COVID-19, a rapidly changing healthcare delivery landscape. As such, stakeholders across health and social care must give consideration to initiatives that will drive improvement in outcomes and quality of care.
Patient-reported outcome measures are questionnaires that capture an individual’s views on their physical, mental and social functioning, disease symptoms or health-related quality of life. 5 Established within healthcare for over a decade, these measures patient-reported outcome measures are central to the delivery of person-centred care. At an individual level, patient-reported outcome measures supplement clinical assessments, facilitate referrals to specialist services, enhance patient–clinician communication, support decision-making around treatment, and assist with symptom checking and monitoring of disease progression. At an organisational level, patient-reported outcome measures are used to monitor provider performance, inform policy and guide quality improvement. 6
In social care, patient-reported outcomes could be used similarly to support the delivery of person-centred care. Patient-reported outcome measures could promote choice and autonomy, ensuring care is responsive to a person’s wishes for their health and wellbeing. At a service level, patient-reported outcome measures could help identify unmet need, facilitate integration of health and social care, and guarantee that measures of quality emphasise person-centred outcomes (Figure 1).
7
Potential uses of patient-reported outcomes data in integrated health and social care.
Consequently, patient-reported outcome measures may be viewed enablers of person-centred health and social care. However, their use in social care is not well documented. 8 In this article, we explore the potential role of patient-reported outcome measures as a bridge between health and social care, clarifying current applications and future opportunities. We explore how cross-cutting patient-reported outcome measures could support better integration of health and social care services, better health outcomes, and enable increased independence and choice for people, as consumers of social care.
Integrated care
Case study – David.
Reducing and preventing unmet need in older, community-dwelling adults
Examples of patient-reported outcome measures in integrated health and social care.
Unmet need in residential settings
Understanding the role of patient-reported outcomes measures in health and social care: directions for future inquiry.
Individualised care planning, safeguarding and palliative care
Patient-reported outcome measures facilitate prioritising of care aims that are congruent with a person’s wishes for their health and wellbeing. 20 In this way, patient-reported outcome measures could promote individuals’ engagement in the care-planning process, and encourage independence and self-care (Box 2). 16 Unwarranted changes in PROM scores could alert professionals to potential safeguarding concerns, triggering amendments to care plans to ensure the safety, effectiveness and efficacy of care. 8 In palliative care settings, end-of-life measures could capture important information regarding autonomy, love, physical and emotional suffering, dignity, support and capability as part of preparations for supportive care at end of life and as a means of evaluating these interventions. 21
Patient-reported outcomes and pandemics
Patient-reported outcome measures, when used for tracking disease symptoms within the general population, provide vital data to understanding the epidemiology of new diseases such as COVID-19 and other threats to population health such as anti-microbial resistance.22,23 Monitoring could help clinicians and researchers understand disease presentation in social care populations where old age, frailty and co-morbidities are common and symptoms may be atypical (Box 2). Remote triage and diagnosis utilising patient-reported outcomes data could enable care to be managed safely in residential settings.
Quality improvement and research
In England, the Adult Social Care Outcomes Framework focusses on four key outcomes social care (i.e. quality of life, safeguarding of vulnerable adults, reducing need for services and service satisfaction). 24 It provides an established reporting structure into which patient-reported outcomes data could be incorporated. Such data could be used to support provider comparisons of social care at organisational, regional and national levels. Aggregate data could also facilitate service developments aimed at supporting integrated care. Augmenting client-reported social care outcome measures, patient-reported outcome measures could provide important health-related data to studies evaluating the effectiveness and efficacy of social care interventions, and the routine capture of patient-reported outcomes data in social care settings could inform research and quality improvement initiatives that cut across health and social care. 5
Challenges to the use of patient-reported outcome measures in integrated health and social care
Challenges and potential solutions to use of patient-reported outcome measures across health and social care.
Patient-reported outcomes, patient-reported outcome measures and models of care
In social care, the culture of care is informed by the social model of disability, where disability is considered to be caused by attitudinal, environmental and social factors within society that fail to take account of people with impairments and their associated needs. Healthcare, despite an increased emphasis on person-centred and value-based care, remains influenced by the medical model with its focus on impairment. 12 Whereas terms such as ‘patient’ and ‘patient-reported’ are used commonly within healthcare, social care consumers rarely identify as ‘patients’ and, as such, terminology around patient-reported outcomes may be perceived as dissonant and incompatible by practitioners and people who use social care. For patient-reported outcome measures to be shared across health and social care, a shared, unambiguous, and culturally responsive language that facilitates communication across services will need to be adopted.
Stakeholder engagement and support
Engagement by relevant stakeholders is vital if patient-reported outcome measures are to be deployed effectively across health and social care. In both sectors, it is important that service users, their loved ones and practitioners appreciate the benefits of the collection of patient-reported outcomes and are involved in decision-making around instrument selection and use. 25 For buy-in from care staff, instrument selection must prioritise the person over service-level needs. Careful planning for implementation is essential, taking into consideration logistics, administrative burden, and evaluation and feedback processes. Leadership that endorses patient-reported outcome measures as part of an organisational culture of person-centredness and supports, in practical ways, the collection, analysis, and use of these data is fundamental. 26 Leaders will need to acknowledge potential attitudinal barriers to patient-reported outcome measure uptake and ensure provision of education and training for professionals that promotes confidence and a greater understanding of patient-reported outcome measurement. 25
Patient-reported outcome measures Instrument selection and standardisation
Over the past three decades, hundreds, if not thousands, of patient-reported outcome measures have been developed. This surfeit of patient-reported outcome measures means it will be necessary to identify and select, in collaboration with stakeholders, valid and reliable instruments appropriate for use in the range of settings where integrated health and social care is provided. Social care is responsible for caring for people with a range of health conditions and multiple needs. Individuals may have low literacy, a learning disability, cognitive impairment and/or sensory disability that make it difficult for them to use patient-reported outcome measures. 27 These factors make the selection of instruments challenging, both at the level of the individual and for services, where patient-reported outcome measures will need to be specific-enough to have good utility without being an administrative burden. Standardisation of measures will be key to encouraging use across settings and services.
Accessibility to address health and care inequalities
Patient-reported outcome measures must be accessible if individuals are to accurately communicate information about their health. All too often, disabled people experience exclusion from the routine monitoring of their health and wellbeing afforded by patient-reported outcome measures. 27 To ensure accessibility, questions must be relevant, question wording clear and formatting accessible. Innovative delivery solutions that exploit technological advances to increase inclusivity should be considered. 28 The aims and benefits of completing a patient-reported outcome measure should be clear to respondents and administration flexible, so people get the help they need to engage with the reporting process. 27 Practitioners must be sensitive to recognising when it may be appropriate (e.g. advancing cognitive decline) to supplement, not replace, patient-reported outcome measures with proxy-reported measures to ensure accurate representation of a person’s health and functioning. 29
Conclusions
Patient-reported outcome measures place the person at the centre of care. As measures of health, patient-reported outcome measures support people to live independent lives of their choosing. Importantly, patient-reported outcome measures provide a shared language of care, helping to bridge the gap between health and social care. The challenges of integrating patient-reported outcome measures across health and social care are significant; however, reporting frameworks and digital electronic patient-reported outcome platforms are already available and, following COVID-19, there is a growing need for safe and effective remote reporting of symptoms and interventions that encourage self-management. Efforts are now needed from stakeholders to grasp the opportunities patient-reported outcome measures offer to integrated care, so their benefits can be realised fully by the people who rely on these services.
Supplemental Material
sj-pdf-1-jrs-10.1177_01410768211014048 - Supplemental material for Patient-reported outcome measurement: a bridge between health and social care?
Supplemental material, sj-pdf-1-jrs-10.1177_01410768211014048 for Patient-reported outcome measurement: a bridge between health and social care? by Sarah Hughes, Olalekan Lee Aiyegbusi, Daniel Lasserson, Philip Collis, Jon Glasby and Melanie Calvert in Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine
Supplemental Material
sj-pdf-2-jrs-10.1177_01410768211014048 - Supplemental material for Patient-reported outcome measurement: a bridge between health and social care?
Supplemental material, sj-pdf-2-jrs-10.1177_01410768211014048 for Patient-reported outcome measurement: a bridge between health and social care? by Sarah Hughes, Olalekan Lee Aiyegbusi, Daniel Lasserson, Philip Collis, Jon Glasby and Melanie Calvert in Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine
Footnotes
Declarations
Acknowledgements
The views expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care.
Provenance
Not commissioned; revised following peer review comments from another journal.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
