A Brief History of Homeopathy

Gevitz N. Unorthodox medical theories. In: Bynum W.F. , Porter R. (eds). Companion Encyclopaedia of the History of Medicine London: Routledge, 1993: 603–33

Fulder S. The Handbook of Alternative and Complementary Medicine. London: Hodder and Stoughton, 1996

Harrison E. The Ineffective State of the Practice of Physic. London: 1806

Forbes J. On the patronage of quacks and impostors by the upper classes of society. British and Foreign Medical Review 1846; 21: 533–40

Loudon I. ‘The Vile Race of Quacks with which this Country is Infested.’ In: Bynum W.F. , Porter R. (eds). Medical Fringe and Medical Orthodoxy 1750–1850. London: Croom Helm, 1987: 42.

‘Omega’. Remarks on quackery. Provincial Medical and Surgical Journal 1840–41; 1: 418–9

Black D. Complementary Medicine. In: Walter J. , Walton L. , Jeremiah A. , Barondess J.A. , Lock S. (eds). The Oxford Medical Companion. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994

Bynum W.F. Science and the Practice of Medicine in the Nineteenth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994: 30

Jonas W.B. , Kaptchuck T. , Linde K. A critical view of homeopathy. Ann Intern Med 2003; 138: 393–9

Kaptchuck T. Intentional ignorance a history of blind assessments and placebo controls in medicine. Bull Hist Med 1998; 72: 401

Anon . Homeopathy. Effective Health Care 2002; 7: 2

Babington Smith C. Champion of Homeopathy. The Life of Margery Blackie. London: John Murray, 1986: 38

Stolberg M. Inventing the randomized double-blind trial: The Nuremberg salt test of 1835. J Roy Soc Med 2006; 99: 643–4. A longer version of this paper is available at http:jameslindlibrary.org

Dean M.E. ‘An innocent deception’: placebo controls in the St Petersburg homeopathy trial. J Roy Soc Med 2006; 99: 375–6. A longer version of this paper is available at http:jameslindlibrary.org