Medical Experts,the Law and Professional Regulation

Meadow v General Medical Council [2006] EWHC 146 (Admin) [http://www.lawreports.co.uk/WLRD/2006/QBD/feb0.1.htm] Accessed 28 March 2006

The Daily Telegraph 18 February 2006 [http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2006/02/18/nmeadow18.xml] Accessed 28 March 2006

Behrman R.E. , Kleigman R.M. , Jenson H.B. , eds. Nelson–Textbook of Paediatrics, 16th edn. London: WB Saunders, 2000

Gornall J. Trial by media. Hosp Doct 2006 [http://www.hospital-doctor.net/hd_archive/hd_refarticle.asp?ID=16625] Accessed 12 April 2006

Magner T. To err is human …? N Law J 2006; 156: 301–3

Wise M.E. Where expert witnesses fear to tread. BMJ 2006; 332: 500–1

The Ikarian Reefer [1993] 2 Lloyds Rep 68

[http://www.civiljusticecouncil.gov.uk] Accessed 9 April 2006

[http://www.ewi.org.uk] Accessed 9 April 2006

Dyer C. Expert witnesses are issued with new advice after high profile failings. BMJ 2006; 332: 381

Paplin C. Sanity restored? N Law J 2006; 156: 385

Griffiths J. Meadow v General Medical Council: a judicial blow for commonsense [http://www.behindthemedicalheadlines.com] Accessed 9 April 2006

General Medical Council. GMC statement on high court judgement ‘Meadow & General Medical Council’, 17 February 2006 [http://www.gmcpressoffice.org.uk-apps/news/latest/print.php?key=225] Accessed 28 March 2006

Pritchard L. GMC appeals ‘on principle’. BMA News 11 March 2006: 6.