Peer Review: A Flawed Process at the Heart of Science and Journals

Lock S. A Difficult Balance: Editorial Peer Review In Medicine. London: Nuffield Provincials Hospital Trust, 1985

Jefferson T. , Alderson P. , Wager E. , Davidoff F. Effects of editorial peer review: a systematic review. JAMA 2002; 287: 2784–6

Godlee F. , Gale C.R. , Martyn C.N. Effect on the quality of peer review of blinding reviewers and asking them to sign their reports: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 1998; 280: 237–40

Schroter S. , Black N. , Evans S. , Carpenter J. , Godlee F. , Smith R. Effects of training on quality of peer review: randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2004; 328: 673

Wennerås C. , Wold A. Sexism and nepotism in peer-review. Nature 1997; 387: 341–3

Peters D. , Ceci S. Peer-review practices of psychological journals: the fate of submitted articles, submitted again. Behav Brain Sci 1982; 5: 187–255

McIntyre N. , Popper K. The critical attitude in medicine: the need for a new ethics. BMJ 1983; 287: 1919–23

Horton R. Pardonable revisions and protocol reviews. Lancet 1997; 349: 6

Rennie D. Misconduct and journal peer review. In: Godlee F. , Jefferson T. , eds. Peer Review In Health Sciences, 2nd edn. London: BMJ Books, 2003: 118–29

McNutt R.A. , Evans A.T. , Fletcher R.H. , Fletcher S.W. The effects of blinding on the quality of peer review. A randomized trial. JAMA 1990; 263: 1371–6

Justice A.C. , Cho M.K. , Winker M.A. , Berlin J.A. , Rennie D. , the PEER investigators. Does masking author identity improve peer review quality: a randomised controlled trial. JAMA 1998; 280: 240–2

van Rooyen S. , Godlee F. , Evans S. , Smith R. , Black N. Effect of blinding and unmasking on the quality of peer review: a randomised trial. JAMA 1998; 280: 234–7

van Rooyen S. , Godlee F. , Evans S. , Black N. , Smith R. Effect of open peer review on quality of reviews and on reviewers’ recommendations: a randomised trial. BMJ 1999; 318: 23–7