‘Open-Access’ Publishing: First the Evidence—then the Verdict

Morgan D.L. , Kreuger R.A. When to use focus groups and why. In: Morgan D.L. , ed. Successful Focus Groups. London: Sage, 1993

Boynton P.M. , Greenhalgh T. Selecting, designing, and developing your questionnaire. BMJ 2004; 328: 1312–15

Adams A.S. , Soumerai S.B. , Lomas J. , Ross-Degnan D. Evidence of self-report bias in assessing adherence to guidelines. Int J Qual Health Care 1999; 11: 187–92

Schroter S. , Tite L. Open access publishing and author-pays business models: a survey of authors’ knowledge and perceptions. J R Soc Med 2006; 99: 141–8

Meyers B. Open access: a matter for definition. Society for Scholarly Publishing. Issue Status Report, June 2004. [www.sspnet.org/i4a/pages/Index.cfm?pageid3571] Accessed 31 January 2006

Cuervo L.G. , Aronson J.K. The road to health care. BMJ 2004; 329: 1–2

Aronson J.K. Open access publishing: too much oxygen? BMJ 2005; 330: 759 [http://bmj.bmjjournals.com/cgi/content/full/330/7494/759/DC1] Accessed 31 January 2006

The Royal Society's position on open access publishing. [www.royalsoc.ac.uk/page.asp?id3967] Accessed 31 January 2006

Scientific publications: free for all? Hansard 15 Dec 2005: Columns 501WH-548WH [www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200506/cmhansrd/cm051215/halltext/51215h01.htm] Accessed 31 January 2006

Check E. NIH open-access plans draw fire from both sides. Nature 2005; 433: 561

Maldonado G. , Poole C. More research is needed. Ann Epidemiol 1999; 9: 17–18