Healthcare research is haunted by a history of unethical studies in which profound harm was caused to vulnerable individuals. Official systems for gaining ethical approval for research, designed to prevent a repetition of these shameful examples, can prove bureaucratic and inflexible in practice. The core ethical principles of respect for autonomy, prevention of harm, promotion of benefit, and justice (which form the basis of professional codes of research conduct) must be applied flexibly to take account of contextual, methodological, personal and practical considerations. Ensuring that the design and conduct of all research is ethically sound is the responsibility of all involved–-including researchers, research institutions, ethics review committees and regulatory bodies.
References
1.
MolyneuxC.S., PeshuN., MarshK.Understanding of informed consent in a low-income setting: three case studies from the Kenyan Coast.Soc Sci Med2004; 59: 2547–59
2.
MaioG.The cultural specificity of research ethics—or why ethical debate in France is different.J Med Ethics2002; 28: 147–50
3.
Nuremberg Code: Trials of War Criminals Before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals Under Control Council Law, Vol. 2, 1949: 181–2
4.
JonesJ.H.The Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment.New York: The Free Press, 1981
5.
BeecherH.H.Ethics and Clinical ResearchN Engl J Med1966; 274: 1354–60
ShawS., BoyntonP.M., GreenhalghT.Research governance: where did it come from, what does it mean?J R Soc Med2005; 98: 496–502
9.
VarmusH., SatcherD.Ethical complexities of conducting research in developing countries.N Engl J Med1997; 337: 1003–5
10.
LurieP., WolfeS.M.Unethical trials of interventions to reduce perinatal transmission of the human immunodeficiency virus in developing countries.N Engl J Med1997; 337: 853–6
11.
FerrisL.E., SingerP.A., NaylorC.D.Better governance in academic health sciences centres: moving beyond the Olivieri/Apotex Affair in Toronto.J Med Ethics2004; 30: 25–9
LankshearG.Bacteria and babies: a personal reflection on researcher risk in a hospital. In: Lee-TreweekG., LinkogleS., eds. Danger in the Field: Risk and Ethics in Social Research.London; New York: Routledge, 2000
15.
BoyntonP.M.The Research Comparison: a Practical Guide For the Social and Health Sciences.Hove; New York: Psychology Press, 2005
16.
HadistavropoulosT., SmythW.E.Elements of risk in qualitative research.Ethics Behav2005; 11: 163–74
17.
ScottD.A., ValeryP.C., BoyleF.M., BainC.J.Does research into sensitive areas do harm? Experiences of research participation after a child's diagnosis with Ewing's sarcoma.Med J Aust2002; 177: 507–10
18.
StevensonF.A., CoxK., BrittenN., DundarY.A systematic review of the research on communication between patients and health care professionals about medicines: the consequences for concordanceHealth Expectations2004; 7: 235–45
19.
McCabeM., MorganF., CurleyH., BegayR., GohdesD.M.The informed consent process in a cross-cultural setting: is the process achieving the intended result?Ethn Dis2005; 15: 300–4
20.
ReC. (adult: refusal of medical treatment). Re C. (adult: refusal of medical treatment).1994, High Court
21.
Euricon study group.Overview of European legislation on informed consent for neonatal research.Arch Dis Child2001; 84: F70–3
22.
Office of the Information Commissioner.Use and Disclosure of Health Data: Guidance On the Application of the Data Protection Act 1998.London: Office of the Information Commissioner, 2004
23.
Medical Research Council.Personal Information in Medical Research.London: MRC, 2000
CassellJ., YoungA.Why we should not seek individual informed consent for participation in health services research.J Med Ethics2002; 28: 313–17
26.
ChalmersI., LindleyR.I.Double standards on informed consent to treatment. In: DoyalL., TobiasJ.S., eds. Informed Consent in Medical Research.London: BMJ books, 2001: 266–76
27.
Randomised trial of intravenous streptokinase, oral aspirin, both, or neither among 17,187 cases of suspected acute myocardial infarction: ISIS-2. ISIS-2 (Second International Study of Infarct Survival) Collaborative Group.Lancet1988; 2: 349–60
28.
BhagwanjeeS., MuckartD.J., JeenaP.M., MoodleyP.Does HIV status influence the outcome of patients admitted to a surgical intensive care unit? A prospective double blind study.BMJ1997; 314: 1077–81
29.
National Institutes of Health.Waiver of informed consent requirements in certain emergency research.Federal Register1996; 61: 51531–3
30.
LindleyR.I.Thrombolytic treatment for acute ischaemic stroke: consent can be ethical.BMJ1998; 316: 1005–7
31.
MacleodU., RossS., TwelvesC., GeorgeW.D., GillisC., WattG.C.Primary and secondary care management of women with early breast cancer from affluent and deprived areas: retrospective review of hospital and general practice records.BMJ2000; 320: 1442–5
32.
FederG., GriffithsC., HightonC., EldridgeS., SpenceM., SouthgateL.Do clinical guidelines introduced with practice based education improve care of asthmatic and diabetic patients? A randomised controlled trial in general practices in east London.BMJ1995; 311: 1473–8
33.
Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit.Cluster Randomised Trials: Methodological and Ethical Issues.London: MRC, 2000
34.
EdwardsS.J., BraunholtzD.A., LilfordR.J., StevensA.J.Ethical issues in the design and conduct of cluster randomised controlled trials.BMJ1999; 318: 1407–9
35.
ParkerM., AshcroftR., WilkieA.O., KentA.Ethical review of research into rare genetic disorders.BMJ2004; 329: 288–9
36.
DennisM., O'RourkeS., SlatteryJ., StaniforthT., WarlowC.Evaluation of a stroke family care worker: results of a randomised controlled trial.BMJ1997; 314: 107–6
37.
BoterH., van DeldenJ.J., de HaanR.J., RinkelG.J.Modified informed consent procedure: consent to postponed information.BMJ2003; 327: 284–5
38.
AlversonH., AlversonM., DrakeR.E.An ethnographic study of the longitudinal course of substance abuse among people with severe mental illness.Commun Mental Health2000; 36: 557–69
39.
Economic and Social Research Council.Research Ethics Framework.London: ESRC, 2005
