Risk assessment can be thought of as the lens through which we anticipate the consequences of research and the impact of the actions of researchers. The way in which risk of harm is managed in research is strongly influenced by the surrounding social and political environment, leading to differences in national and local styles of regulation and review.
Different research studies carry different risks, so systems for review and approval must adapt to the question being asked and the nature of the study. Researchers can never wholly guarantee safety in any research but participants and researchers must be offered reasonable protection within any study, with appropriate arrangements in place should something go wrong.
References
1.
LuptonD.Risk.London: Routledge, 1999
2.
Van NessP.The concept of risk in biomedical research involving human subjects.Bioethics2001; 15: 364–70
3.
ParkerD.B., BarrettR.J.Collective danger and individual risk: cultural perspectives on the hazards of medical research.Intern Med J2003; 33: 463–4
4.
EvansJ.H.A sociological account of the growth of principalism.Hastings Center Rep2000; 30: 31–8
5.
Human Tissue Act c.30.London: HMSO, 2004
6.
BennettJ.R.The organ retention furore: the need for consent.Clin Med2001; 1: 167–71
7.
BeckU.Risk Society.London: Sage, 1992
8.
PowerM.The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification.Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997
9.
Department of Health.Research Governance Framework for Health and Social Care.London: Department of Health, 2001
10.
JamrozikK.The case for a new system of oversight of research on human subjects.J Med Ethics2000; 26: 334–9
11.
LockS., WellsF., eds. Fraud and Misconduct in Medical Research.London: BMJ Publishing, 1993
12.
DuValG.Ethics in psychiatric research: study design issues.Can J Psychiatry2004; 49: 55–9
13.
SaundersJ., WainwrightP.Risk: Helsinki 2000 and the use of placebo in medical research.Clin Med2005; 3: 435–9
14.
SibilleM., DeigatN., JaninA., IrkesseS., DurandD.V.Adverse events in phase-I studies: a report in 1015 healthy volunteers.Eur J Clin Pharmacol1998; 54: 13–20
15.
FitzsimonsD., McAloonT.The ethics of non-intervention in a study of patients awaiting coronary artery bypass surgery.J Adv Nurs2004; 46: 395–402
16.
JonesA.M., BamfordB.The other face of research governance.BMJ2004; 329: 280–1
17.
HearnshawH.Comparison of requirements of research ethics committees in 11 European countries for a non-invasive interventional study.BMJ2004; 328: 140–1
18.
MinnisH.J.Ethics review in research: ethics committees are risk adverse.BMJ2004; 328: 710–1
19.
World Medical Association.Declaration of Helsinki.Helsinki: WMA, 1964
20.
Royal College of General Practitioners.Informal Consultation On Barriers To Research Created By Over-Regulation, Ethics Committees Etc.London: Royal College of General Practitioners Research Group, 2004
TerryW., OlsonL.G., RavenscroftP., WilssL., Boulton-LewisG.Hospice patients’ views of research in palliative care.Internal Med J (in press)
23.
DyregrovK.Bereaved parents’ experience of research participation.Soc Sci & Med2004; 58: 391–400
24.
Central Office for Research Ethics Committees.Governance Arrangements for NHS Research Ethics Committees.London: COREC, 2001
25.
ColemanM.P., EvansB.G., BarrettG.Confidentiality and the public interest in medical research—will we ever get it right?Clin Med2003; 3: 219–28
26.
PetoJ., FletcherO., GilhamC.Data protection, informed consent, and research.BMJ2004; 328: 1029–30
27.
CassellJ., YoungA.Why we should not seek individual informed consent for participation in health services research.J Med Ethics2002; 28: 313–7
28.
McKinneyP.A., JonesS., ParslowR., A feasibility study of signed consent for the collection of patient identifiable information for a national paediatric clinical audit database.BMJ2005; 330: 877–9
29.
The Medicines for Human Use (Clinical Trials) Regulations, SI No. 1031.London: HMSO, 2004
30.
European Parliament and the Council of the European Union.Directive 2001/20/EC.Luxembourg: European Parliament, 2001
31.
Data Protection Act.London: HMSO, 1998
32.
Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act.London: HMSO, 1990
