SchulzK.F., ChalmersI., HayesR.J., AltmanD.G.Empirical evidence of bias: dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials.J Am Med Assoc1995; 273: 408–12
5.
MilgromC., GiladiM., KashtanH., A prospective study of the effect of a shock-absorbing orthotic device on the incidence of stress fractures in military recruits.Foot Ankle1985; 6: 101–4
6.
GardnerL.I., DziadosJ.E., JonesB.H., Prevention of lower extremity stress fractures: a controlled trial of a shock absorbant insole.Am J Public Health1988; 78: 1563–7
7.
ShermanR.A., KarstetterK.W., MayH., WoermanA.L.Prevention of lower limb pain in soldiers using shock-absorbing orthotic inserts.J Am Pod Med Assoc1996; 86: 117–22
8.
SchwellnusM.P., JordaanG., NoakesT.D.Prevention of common overuse injuries by the use of shock absorbing insoles. A prospective study.Am J Sports Med1990; 18: 636–41
9.
FinestoneA., GiladiM., EladH., Prevention of stress fractures using custom biomechanical shoe orthoses.Clin Orthopaedics Related Res1999; 360: 182–90
10.
FinestoneA., NovackV., FarfelA., BergA., AmirH., MilgromC.A prospective study of the effect of foot orthoses composition and fabrication on comfort and the incidence of overuse injuries.Foot Ankle Int2004; 25: 462–6
11.
EstermanA., PilottoL.Foot shape and its effect on functioning in Royal Australian Air Force recruits. Part 2: pilot, randomized, controlled trial of orthotics in recruits with flat feet.Military Med2005; 170: 629–33