The Human Rights Act 1998.London: Stationery Office
2.
HewsonB.Why the Human Rights Act matters to doctors.BMJ2000; 321: 780–2
3.
McHargA.Reconciling human rights and the public interest: conceptual problems and doctrinal uncertainties in the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights.Modern Law Rev1999; 62: 671–96
4.
Handyside v United Kingdom (1976) 1 EHCR 737
5.
StarmerK.Two years of the Human Rights Act.EHRLR2003; 1: 14–23
6.
WadhamJ., MountfieldH., EdmundsonA.Blackstone's Guide to the Human Rights Act 1998, 3rd edn.Oxford: OUP, 2003
7.
R(H) v MHRT [2001] Med L Rev 185
8.
Mental Health Act (Remedial) Order2001
9.
Osman v United Kingdom (1998) 5 BHRC 293
10.
Re A (children) (conjoined twins) [2000] 4 All ER 961
11.
R v Woollin [1998] 4 All ER 103
12.
R (application of Mrs Diane Pretty) v DPP and Secretary of State for the Home Department [2001] 3 WLR 1598 (HL)
13.
NHS Trust A v M; NHS Trust B v H [2000] Lloyds Rep Med (Fam Div)807
14.
SamantaJ., SamantaA.Human Rights Act 1998 imposes an obligation to facilitate a good death.BMJ2003; 327: 225
15.
Ms B and An NHS Hospital Trust [2002] EWHC 429 (Fam)
16.
In Re S (adult patient: sterilisation) [2001] Fam 15
17.
Glass v UK (Application No 61827/00) [2004] 1 FCR 553
18.
HaversP., NeenanC.Impact of the European Convention on Human Rights in medical law: not only is the right to life protected by law but the State should take steps to safeguard life.Postgrad Med J2002; 78: 573–5
19.
Re AK (2001) 58 BMLR 151
20.
R (Burke) v General Medical Council (Defendant) and Disability Rights Commission (interested party) and the Official Solicitor (Intervener) [2004] EWHC 1879
21.
R (Wilkinson) v Broadmoor Special Health Authority [2002] 1WLR 419
22.
SamantaA.Death, dying and the doctor: a dilemma at the bedside.Contemporary Issues in Law (in press)
23.
SheldonS.Evans v Amicus Healthcare; Hadley v Midland Fertility Services—Revealing cracks in the ‘twin pillars'? (2004) 16 Child and Family Law Quarterly 437
24.
Quintavalle (on behalf of Comment on Reproductive Ethics) v Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority [2005] UKHL 28
25.
Tarbuck, Blood and Blood (2002) Unreported
26.
Winterwerp v Netherlands (1979) 2 EHRR 387
27.
Johnson v UK (1998) 2 EHRLR 224
28.
Mental Health Act 1983 (s131)
29.
R v Bournewood Community and Mental Health Trust ex parte L [1998] 1 All ER 634 (CA)
30.
R v Bournewood Community and Mental Health Trust ex parte L [1998] 3 All ER 289 (HL)
31.
HL v UK (2004) 45508/99
32.
Re A (medical treatment: male sterilisation) [2000] 1 FLR 465
33.
Caldicott guardians HSC 99/012
34.
MontgomeryJ.Healthcare Law.Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002
35.
Van Oosterwijck v Belgium (1981) 3EHRR 557
36.
Dudgeon v UK (1981) 4EHRR 149
37.
R v Department of Health, ex parte Source Informatics Ltd [2000] 1All ER 786 (CA)
38.
Douglas v Hello [2001] All ER 289 (CA)
39.
Z v Finland 25 EHRR 371
40.
MS v Sweden (1999) 28 EHRR 313
41.
Scialacqua v Italy (1998) 26 EHRR CD 162
42.
R v DPP ex parte Kebeline [1999] 4 All ER 801 (HL)
43.
North West Lancashire HA v A, D and G [1999] Lloyds’ Rep Med 399
44.
WillmanS.A healthy approach to human rights?New Law J2005; 7173: 605
