Deciding whether someone is legally competent to make decisions regarding their own treatment requires an assessment of their mental capacity. The assessed capacity required for legal competence increases with the seriousness of what is at stake. The usual explanation is that patient autonomy is being balanced against best interests. An alternative explanation, that we require greater room for error when the consequences are serious, implies a change to clinical practice and in the evidence doctors offer in court.
References
1.
Re B [2002] 2 All E.R. 449
2.
Adults with Incapacity (Scotland) Act 2000
3.
CrichtonJ.Mental incapacity and consent to treatment: the Scottish experience.J Forens Psychiatry2000; 11: 457–64
4.
Lotman v.Security Mutual Life Insurance Company 478 F.2d. 868 (3d. Cir 1973)
Cobbs v. Grant 8 Cal. 3d. 229, 242; 104 Cal. Rptr. 505; 502 P. 2d. 1 (1972)
7.
Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health 497 US 261 (1990)
8.
Jacobson v. Massachusetts 197 US 11 (1905)
9.
Kahn v. St. Thomas Psychiatric Hospital 7 O.R. (3d.) 303 (1992)
10.
Department for Constitutional Affairs.Draft Mental Incapacity Bill.London: Stationery Office, 2003
11.
Scottish Executive.Adults with Incapacity (Scotland) Act 2000. Code of Practice.Edinburgh: Scottish Executive, 2002
12.
CulverC., GertB.Philosophy in Medicine.New York: Oxford University Press, 1982
13.
SilberfeldM., FishA.When the Mind Fails: a Guide to Dealing with Incompetency.Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1994
14.
RobertsL.Informed consent and the capacity for voluntarism.Am J Psychiatry2002; 159: 705–12
15.
BergJ., AppelbaumP., GrissoT.Constructing competence: formulating standards of legal competence to make medical decisions.Rutgers Law Rev1996; 48: 345–96
16.
Re MB, [1997] 2 FLR 426
17.
BuchananA., BrockD.Deciding for others.Milbank Q1986; 64(suppl. 2): 17–94
18.
MarsonD., IngramK., CodyH., HarrellL.Assessing the competency of patients with Alzheimer's disease under different legal standards.Arch Neurol1995; 52: 949–59
19.
WongJ., ClareI., GunnM., HollandA.Capacity to make health care decisions: its importance in clinical practice.Psychol Med1999; 29: 437–46
20.
AppelbaumP., GrissoT.Assessing patients’ capacities to consent to treatment.N Engl J Med1988; 319: 1635–8
21.
National Bioethics Advisory Commission.Research Involving Persons with Mental Disorders That May Affect Decisionmaking Capacity.Rockville, MD: NBAC, 1998
22.
Re T, [1992] 4 All E.R. 649
23.
WicclairM.Patient decision-making capacity and risk.Bioethics1991; 5: 91–104
24.
CulverC., GertB.The inadequacy of incompetence.Milbank Q1990; 68: 619–43
25.
FadenD., BeauchampT.A History and Theory of Informed Consent.New York: Oxford University Press, 1986
26.
RothL., MeiselA., LidzC.Tests of competency to consent to treatment.Am J Psychiatry1977; 134: 279–84
27.
GaylinW.The competence of children: no longer all or none.Hastings Cent Rep1982; 12(April): 33–8
28.
AbernethyV.Compassion, control and decisions about competency.Am J Psychiatry1984; 141: 53–8
29.
BartlettP., SandlandR.Mental Health Law: Policy and Practice.London: Blackstone, 1999
30.
Glover-ThomasN.Reconstructing Mental Health Law and Policy.London: Butterworth, 2002
31.
GrissoT., AppelbaumP.Assessing Competence to Consent to Treatment: a Guide for Physicians and Other Health Professionals.New York: Oxford University Press, 1998
32.
Bioethics Interest Group.Expert Panel Report to the National Institutes of Health (NIH). Research Involving Individuals with Questionable Capacity to Consent: Ethical Issues and Practical Considerations for Institutional Review Boards (IRBs).Bethesda: NIH, 1998
33.
BrodyH.Autonomy revisited: progress in medical ethics.J R Soc Med1985; 78: 380–7
34.
EastmanN., HopeR.The ethics of enforced medical treatment: the balance model.J Appl Philos1988; 5: 49–59
35.
BuchananA., BrockD.Deciding for Others. The Ethics of Surrogate Decision Making.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989
36.
DraneJ.The many faces of competency.Hastings Center Rep1985; 15: 17–21
President's Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research.Making Health Care Decisions, Vol. 1. Washington, DC: President's Commission, 1982
39.
BeauchampT., ChildressJ.Principles of Biomedical Ethics, 5th edn.New York: Oxford University Press, 2001
American Psychiatric Association.Guidelines for assessing the decision-making capacities of potential research subjects with cognitive impairment.Am J Psychiatry1998; 155: 1649–50
42.
WinnickB.Competency to consent to treatment: the distinction between assent and objection.Houston Law Rev1991; 28: 15–61
43.
TerryH.Negligence.Harvard Law Rev1915; 29: 40–54
44.
AppelbaumP., LidzC., MeiselA.Informed Consent. Legal Theory and Clinical Practice.New York: Oxford University Press, 1987
45.
ChecklandD.On risk and decisional capacity.J Med Philos2001; 26: 35–39
46.
VeatchR.A Theory of Medical Ethics.New York: Basic, 1981
47.
WhiteB.Competence to Consent.Washington DC: Georgetown University Press, 1994
48.
DemarcoJ.Competence and paternalism.Bioethics2002; 16: 231–45
49.
FeinbergJ.The Moral Limits of the Criminal Law: Harm to Self, Vol. 3. New York: Oxford University Press,1986
50.
CaleG.Continuing the debate over risk-related standards of competence.Bioethics1999; 13: 131–48
51.
WicclairM.The continuing debate over risk-related standards of competence.Bioethics1999; 13: 149–53
52.
VeatchR.A Theory of Medical Ethics.New York: Basic, 1981
53.
Matter of Spring 380 Mass. 629; 405 N.E. 2d. 115 (1980)
54.
Matter of Quinlan 355 A.3d 647 at 664
55.
R v Bournewood Community and Mental Health NHS Trust ex parte L [1998] 3 All E R 289, HL
56.
WicclairM.Patient decision-making capacity and risk.Bioethics1991; 5: 91–104
57.
ErdeE.Breaking the shell game of consequentialism: incompetence— concept and ethics. In: CutterM., ShelpE., eds. Competency.Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1990: 237–52
58.
ChecklandD.On risk and decisional capacity.J Med Philos2001; 26: 35–39
59.
CulverC., GertB.The inadequacy of incompetence.Milbank Q1990; 68: 619–43
60.
BurtR.Taking Care of Strangers. The Rule of Law in Doctor—Patient Relations.New York: Free Press, 1979
61.
StoneA.The right to die: new problems for law and medicine and psychiatry.Emory Law1988; 37: 627–43
62.
GrissoT., AppelbaumP., Hill-FotouchiC.The MacCAT-T: a clinical tool to assess patients’ capacities to make treatment decisions.Psychiatr Serv1997; 48: 1415–19
63.
PoythressN., BonnieR., MonahanJ., OttoR., HogeS.Adjudicative Competence. The MacArthur Studies.Kluwer: New York, 2002
