Regulation of the Medical Profession: Fantasy,Reality and Legality

Learning from Bristol: The Report of the Public Inquiry into Children's Heart Surgery at the Bristol Royal Infirmary. London: Stationery Office, 2001. [www.bristol-inquiry.org.uk] accessed 26 February 2004

The Royal Liverpool Children's Inquiry Report. London: Stationery Office, 2001. [www.rlcinquiry.org.uk] accessed 26 February 2004

The Shipman Inquiry. London: Stationery Office, 2002 [www.the-shipman-inquiry.org.uk/reports.asp] accessed 26 February 2004

House of Lords debates. Select Committee on Science & Technology 2000. Hansard 4 Mar 1999, col. 1801

Merrison Report. Report of the Committee of Enquiry into the Regulation of the Medical Profession. London: HM Stationery Office, 1975

Price D. Legal aspects of the regulation of the health professions. In: Allsop J. , Saks M. , eds. Regulating the Health Profession. London: Sage, 2002

Samanta A. , Samanta J. , Gunn M. Legal considerations of clinical guidelines: will NICE make a difference? J R Soc Med 2003; 96: 133–8

Dewar S. , Finlayson B. The I in the new CHAI. BMJ 2002; 325: 848–50

Samanta A, Samanta J. NICE guidelines and law—clinical governance implications for Trusts. Clinical Governance: an Instructional Journal (in press)

Allsop J. Regulation and the medical profession. In: Allsop J. , Saks M. , eds. Regulating the Health Profession. London: Sage, 2002

Department of Health. An Organisation with a Memory. London: Stationery Office, 2000

Rosenthal M. The Incompetent Doctor: Behind Closed Doors. Buckingham: Open University Press, 1995

Samanta A. , Samanta J. Legal standard of care: a shift from the traditional Bolam test. Clin Med 2003; 3: 443–6

Doyle C. Is this any way to treat a doctor? Daily Telegraph 28 January 2004: 18.

Wark P. Sacked for daring to criticise the NHS. Times 3 July 2003; T2: 6–7

Anon. Doctor suspensions ‘cost £50,000,000 each year’. Hosp Doctor 30 October 2003: 7

Newman M. Suspension proposals accused of unfairness. Hosp Doctor 30 October 2003: 1.

The Management of Suspensions of Clinical Staff in NHS Hospital and Ambulance Trusts in England. London: Stationery Office, 2003 [www.nao.gov.uk/publications/nao_reports/02-03/02031143es/pdf] accessed 26 February 2004

Empey D. Suspension of doctors. BMJ 2004; 328: 181–2

Department of Health. Annual Report of the Chief Medical Officer 2002. London: DoH, 2003

Department of Health. The Restriction of Practice and Exclusion from Work Directives. London: DoH, 2003

Department of Health. Maintaining High Professional Standards in the Modern NHS. London: DoH, 2003

National Clinical Assessment Authority. [www.ncaa.nhs.uk/] accessed 26 February 2004

Colbrook P. Formal and informal suspensions and the NCAA. BMJ Career Focus 2003; 327: s163 (22 November)

NCAA finds suspension of doctors ‘not always necessary’. 28 October 2003 [www.ncaa.nhs.uk/news/index] accessed 26 February 2004

Anonymous. Both clinicians and managers to blame for most suspensions. Hosp Doct 30 November 2003: 12.

Newman M. Most suspensions last ‘over a year’. Hosp Dct 18 September 2003: 9.

Savage W. A Savage Inquiry. London: Virago, 1986

Carlisle D. The suspension is killing them…. BMA News 31 January 2004: 13.

R v General Medical Council ex parte Toth (2000). Lloyds Rep Med 368

Doughty v General Dental Council. 1987. 3 All ER (PC)

Allinson v General Council of Medical Education and Registration. 1894. 1 QB 750 (CA)

McCandless v General Medical Council. 1995. 30 BMLR 53 (PC)

Dr Mohinder Singh v General Medical Council (PC, 13/5/98). LTL 12/6/98

Preiss v General Dental Council. 2001. 1 WLR 1926

Libman v General Medical Council. 1972. PC 217

Selvanathan v General Medical Council. 2001. Lloyds Rep Med I

Misra v General Medical Council. Privy Council Appeal No 43 of 2002

Rai v General Medical Council. Privy Council Appeal No 54 of 1983

Walker v General Medical Council. Privy Council Appeal No 94 of 2001

Rao v General Medical Council. Privy Council Appeal No 21 of 2002

Silver v General Medical Council. Privy Council Appeal No 66 of 2002

Bolton v Law Society. 1994. 2 All ER 486

Gupta v General Medical Council. 2002. 1 WLR 1691

Bijl v General Medical Council. Privy Council Appeal No 78 of 2000

General Medical Council. Supporting Doctors, Protecting Patients—the New NHS. An Executive Summary. A Licence to Practise and Revalidation. London: General Medical Council

Southgate L. , Cox J. , David T. . The assessment of poorly performing doctors: the development of the assessment programmes for the General Medical Council's performance procedures. Med Educ 2001; 35(suppl 1): 228

Krippendorf v General Medical Council. 2001. Lloyds Rep 9