CorpsJ.O.E.Berzelius: His Life and Work.Berkeley: University of California Press, 1970: 120
2.
National Science Foundation.Report on Science and Technology Indicators.Arlington, VA, 2002
3.
KristenN.D.God, Satan and the media.NY Times, March 4, 2003: A25
4.
TalbotM.Turned on, turned out.NY Times Magazine, February 16, 2003: 9–10
5.
ShorterC.Public Schools and Private Education: the Clarendon Commission 1861-4 and the Public Schools Act.Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1988
6.
MacleodR.Science for imperial efficiency and social change. Reflections on the British Science Guild.Public Understanding of Science1994; 3: 155–93
7.
Royal Society.The Public Understanding of Science.London: Royal Society, 1985
8.
BodmerW.F.The Public Understanding of Science: the Bernal Lecture.London: Royal Society, 1986
9.
DurantJ.R., EvansG.A., ThomasG.P.The public understanding of science.Nature1989; 340: 11–14
10.
House of Lords Parliamentary Select Committee on Science and Technology.Science and Society.London: Stationery Office, 2000
11.
Wellcome Trust and Office of Science and Technology.Science and the Public.London: Wellcome Trust, 2000
12.
PopperK.R.The Logic of Scientific Discovery (1935).London: Hutchinson, 1959
13.
ZimanJ.Real Science: What it Is, and What it Means.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000: 226
14.
HallJ.EH Gombrich, the preference for the primitive.Times Lit Suppl 18 October 2002, 3
15.
DarwinC.Observation, 18 September 1861. In: BurckhartF., BrowneJ., PorterD., RichmondM., eds. The Correspondence of Charles Darwin.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994
16.
BaronJ.H.Medical students and the history of medicine.J R Soc Med1996; 89: 728
17.
McComasW.F.The Nature of Science in Science Education: Rationales and Strategies.Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1998