WoolfS.H.An organised analytical framework for practice guideline development: using the analytical logic as a guide for reviewing evidence, developing recommendations, and explaining the rationale. In: McCormickK.A., MooreS.R., SiegelR.A., eds. Methodology Perspectives.Washington DC: US Department of Health & Human Services, Agency for Healthcare Policy and Research, 1994: 105–13
5.
CookD.J., MulrowC.D., HaynesR.B.Systematic reviews: synthesis of best evidence for clinical practice.Ann Intern Med1997; 126: 376–80
6.
WoolfS.H., GrollR., HutchinsonA., EcclesM., GrimshawJ.Clinical guidelines: potential benefits, limitations, and harms of clinical guidelines.BMJ1999; 318: 527–30
7.
KaneR.L.Creating practice guidelines: the dangers of over-reliance on expert judgement.J Law Med Ethics1995; 23: 62–4
LomasJ.Teaching old (and not so old) docs new tricks: effective ways to implement research findings. In: DunnE.V., NortonP.G., StewartM., TudiverF., BassM.J., eds. Disseminating Research and Changing Practice. Research Methods for Primary Care, vol. 6. Oaks, CA: Sage, 1994: 1000
10.
GrimshawJ.M., RussellI.T.Effective clinical guidelines in medical practice: a systematic review of rigorous evaluations.Lancet1993; 342: 1317–22
11.
HutchinsonA., BakerR., eds. Making Use of Guidelines in Clinical Practice.Abingdon: Radcliffe Medical, 1999
12.
GillG.Going Dutch? How to make clinical guidelines work–an innovative report from Holland.Clin Med2001; 1: 3072
13.
SolomonR.P.Clinical guidelines in the United States: perspectives on law and litigation. In: TingleJ., FosterC., eds. Clinical Guidelines: Law, Policy and Practice.London: Cavendish, 2002
14.
Daubert v Merrel Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc 509 US 579 [1993]
15.
HyamsA., BrandenburgJ., LipsitzS., ShapiroD., BrennanT.Practice guidelines in malpractice litigation: A two way street.Ann Intern Med1995; 122: 450–5
16.
Lowry v Henry Mayo Newhall Memorial Hospital 229 Cal Reports RPTR 620 [1986]
17.
Denton Regional Medical Centre v Lacroix 947 SW 2D941 (Tex Appeal) [1997]
18.
Helling v Carey 519 2D 981 [Wash 1974]
19.
Maine Public Law1990, Chapter 931
20.
Florida Statutes Title1992 Chapter 408.02(9)
21.
Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee [1957] 1 WLR 582
22.
Loveday v Renton [1991] Med LR 117
23.
Early v Newham Health Authority [1994] 5 Med LR 214
24.
Re C (a minor) (medical treatment) [1998] Lloyds Rep Med 1 27
25.
Penney, Palmer and Canon v East Kent Health Authority [2000] Lloyds Rep Med 41
26.
Airedale NHS Trust v Bland [1993] 4 Med LR 39
27.
HarpwoodV.NHS reform audit protocols and standards of care.Med Law Int1994; 1: 241–59
28.
ElwoodP.M.Outcomes management, a technology of patient experience.N Engl J Med1988; 318: 1549–56
29.
McPhersonK.Why do variations occur? In: AndersonT.F., MooneyG., eds. The Challenge of Medical Practice Variations.London: Macmillan, 1990
30.
HarpwoodV.The limitations of evidence.J R Coll Phys Lond1998; 32: 23–5
31.
TingleJ.The developing role of clinical guidelines. In: TingleJ., FosterC., eds. Clinical Guidelines: Law, Policy and Practice.London: Cavendish, 2002
32.
FosterC.Civil procedure, trial issues and clinical guidelines. In: TingleJ., FosterC., eds. Clinical Guidelines: Law, Policy and Practice.London: Cavendish, 2002
33.
SaltmanR.B., Ferrousier-DavisO.The concept of stewardship in health policy.Bull WHO2000; 78: 732–9
34.
McKeeM.Measuring the efficiency of health systems.BMJ2001; 323: 29–6
35.
1999Statutory Instrument No. 220
36.
SackettD.L., RichardsonW.S., RosenbergW., HaynesR.B.Evidence Based Medicine: how to Practice ERM.New York: Churchill Livingstone,1996
37.
DanielsN., SabinJ.Closure of fair proceedings and setting limits within managed care organisations.J Am Geriatr Soc1998; 46: 351–4
38.
SyrettK.NICE work? Rationing, review and the ‘legitimacy problem’ in the new NHS.Med LR2002; 10: 1–27
39.
Department of Health.A Commitment to Quality, Quest for Excellence.London: Stationery Office,2001
40.
DewarS., FinlaysonB.The I in the new CHAI.BMJ2002; 325: 848–50