FoxS., RainieL.Vital Decisions: How Inter-net Users Decide what Information to Trust when they or their Loved Ones are Sick.Washington, DC: The Pew Internet & American Life Project, 2002 [www.pewinternet.org/reports/pdfs/PIP_Vital_Decisions_May2002.pdf] (accessed July 2002)
GrayJ.A.M.The Resourceful Patient.Oxford: eRosetta Press, 2002 [www.resourcefulpatient.org] (accessed July 2002)
6.
FoxS., RainieL.The Online Health Care Revolution: How the Web helps Americans take Better Care of Themselves.Washington, DC: The Pew Internet & American Life Project, 2000 [www.pewinternet.org/reports/pdfs/PIP_Health_Report.pdf] (accessed July 2002)
7.
EysenbachG., PowellJ., KussO., SaE.R.Empirical studies assessing the quality of health information for consumers on the world wide web: a systematic review.JAMA2002; 287: 2691–700
8.
EysenbachG., KohlerC.How do consumers search for and appraise health information on the world wide web? Qualitative study using focus groups, usability tests, and in-depth interviews.BMJ2002; 324: 573–7
9.
PurcellG.P., WilsonP., DelamotheT.The quality of health information on the internet.BMJ2002; 324: 557–8
10.
ShepperdS., CharnockD.Against internet exceptionalism.BMJ2002; 324: 556–7
11.
CroccoA.G., Villasis-KeeverM., JadadA.R.Analysis of cases of harm associated with the use of information on the internet.JAMA2002; 287: 2869–71
12.
Anonymous.Taking the Pulse: Physicians and Emerging Information Technologies.New York: Deloitte Research & Fulcrum Analytics, 2002
13.
ReevesP.M.How individuals coping with HIV/AIDS use the Internet.Health Educ Res2001; 16: 709–19
14.
ShapiraN.A., GoldsmithT.D., KeckP.E.Jr., KhoslaU.M., McElroyS.L.Psychiatric features of individuals with problematic internet use.J Affect Disord2000; 57: 267–72
15.
WastlundE., NorlanderT., ArcherT.Internet blues revisited: replication and extension of an Internet paradox study.Cyberpsychol Behav2001; 4: 385–91
16.
SandersC.E., FieldT.M., DiegoM., KaplanM.The relationship of Internet use to depression and social isolation among adolescents.Adolescence2000; 35: 237–42
17.
CelioA.A., WinzelbergA.J., WilfleyD.E.Reducing risk factors for eating disorders: comparison of an Internet- and a classroom-delivered psychoeducational program.J Consult Clin Psychol2000; 68: 650–7
18.
TakahusiY., SatomuraK., MiyagishimaK.A new smoking cessation programme using the Internet.Tob Control1999; 8: 109–10
19.
TateD.F., WingR.R., WinettR.A.Using Internet technology to deliver a behavioral weight loss program.JAMA2001; 285: 1172–7
20.
LorigK.R., LaurentD.D., DeyoR.A., MarnellM.E., MinorM.A., RitterP.L.Can a back pain E-mail discussion group improve health status and lower health care costs?: a randomized study.Arch Intern Med2002; 162: 792–6
21.
FischbacherC., ChappelD., EdwardsR., SummertonN.Health surveys by the internet: quick and dirty or rapid and robust.J R Soc Med2000; 93: 356–9
22.
LenertL.A., LoomanT., AgoncilloT., NguyenM., SturdyA., JacksonC.M.Potential validity of conducting research on headache in internet populations.Headache2002; 42: 200–3
23.
HardeyM.Doctor in the house: the internet as a source of lay health knowledge and the challenge to expertise.Sociol Health Illness1999; 21: 820–35
24.
PottsH.W., WyattJ.C.Survey of doctors’ experience of patients using the Internet.J Med Internet Res2002; 4: e5 [www.jmir.org/2002/1/e5] (accessed July 2002)
IrvingL., Klegar LevyK.Falling through the Net: Defining the Digital Divide.Washington, DC: US Department of Commerce, 1999 [www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/fttn99/FTTN.pdf] (accessed July 2002)