CareyS., LowS., HansbroJ.Adult Literacy in Britain.London: Office for National Statistics, 1997
4.
KubbaH.The reading skills of otolaryngology outpatients: implications for information provision.J Laryngol Otol2000; 114: 694–6
5.
ImpicciatoreP., PandolfiniC., CasellaN., BonatiM.Reliability of health information for the public on the World Wide Web: a systematic survey of advice on managing fever in children at home.BMJ1997; 314: 1875–8
6.
GrootD., RietG., KhanK.S., MissoK.Comparison of search strategies and quality of medical information on the internet: a study relating to ankle sprain.Injury2001; 32: 473–6
7.
LattheP.M., LattheM., KhanKS.Quality of medical information about menorrhagia on the worldwide web.Br J Obstet Gynaecol2000; 107: 39–43
8.
JonesR.Developments in consumer health informatives in the next decade.Health Libraries Rev2000; 17: 26–31
9.
WilsonSM.Impact of the internet on primary care staff in Glasgow.J Med Internet Res1999; 1: e7 [http://www.jmir.org/1999/2/e7/index.htm] (accessed 14 November 2001)
10.
BinghamB.J., WilsonSM.Results of survey of Scottish otolaryngologists.ENT News (in press)
11.
KimP., EngT.R., DeeringM.J., MaxfieldA.Published criteria for evaluating health related web sites: review.BMJ1999; 318: 647–9
12.
JadadA.R., GagliardiA.Rating health information on the internet. Navigating to knowledge or to Babel?JAMA1998; 279: 611–14
AmbreJ., GuardR., PerveilerF.M., RennerJ., RippenH.Criteria for assessing the quality of health information on the internet.Health Information Technology Institute, Agency for Health Care Policy and Research [http://www.hitiweb.mitretek.org/iq/onlycriteria.html] (accessed 14 October 2001)
15.
TenchC.M., ClunieG.P., DacreJ., PeacockA.An insight into rheumatology resources available on the World Wide Web.Br J Rheumatol1998; 37: 1233–5
16.
BaderS.A., BraudeRM.Patient informatics: creating new partnerships in medical decision making.Acad Med1998; 73: 408–11
17.
D'AllesandroD.M., D'AllesandroM.P., ColbertSI.A proposed solution for addressing the challenge of patient cries for help through analysis of unsolicited electronic mail.Pediatrics2000; 105: 1324 [http://www.pediatrics.org/cgi/content/full/105/6/e74] (accessed 14 November 2001)