Emigration pressures are primarily the result of increasing inequalities between countries which, in turn, are the result of factors internal to less developed countries and their relations with developed countries. Both micro (neoclassical) and macrostructural theories of migration are re-viewed. It is argued that the neoclassical theory of migration is often unjustly criticized and is sufficiently robust to incorporate those structural considerations which are at the core of macrostructural theories. Moreover, the neoclassical theory, with slight modification, can incorporate the “new economics of migration.” The major empirical problem confronting models of international labor migration is that migration flows are constrained by immigration policy. This policy, in turn, is influenced by various special interest groups. The direction and form of migration flows is conditioned by contemporary and historical relationships between source and destination countries.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ArrighiG.1970“Labor Supplies in Historical Perspective: A Study of the Proletarianization of the African Peasantry in Rhodesia,”Journal of Development Studies, April, pp. 197–234.
2.
BellR. T.1972“Migrant Labor: Theory and Policy,”South African Journal of Economics, 40:337–360.
3.
BergerS.PioreM. J.1980Dualism and Discontinuity in Industrial Societies. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
4.
BorjasG.J.1990Friends or Strangers: The Impact of Immigration on the US Economy. New York: Basic Books.
5.
BorjasG.J.1989“Economic Theory and International Migration,”International Migration Review, 23(3):457–485.
6.
BoydMonica1989“Family and Personal Networks in International Migration: Recent Developments and New Agendas,”International Migration Review, 23(3):638–670.
7.
BrennanM. J.1965“A More General Theory of Resource Migration.” In Patterns of Resource Behavior. Edited by BrennanM. J., Providence: Brown University Press.
8.
BrownLawrence A.MooreEric G.1970“The Intra-Urban Migration Process: A Perspective”, Georgraftska Annaler, Series B, 52:1–13.
9.
CastlesStephenMillerMark J.1993The Age of Migration: International Population Movements in the Modern World. London: Macmillan.
10.
DavisK.1981“Emerging Issues in International Migration.” Paper presented at the IUSSP International Population Conference, Manila.
11.
DiehlW. D.1966“Farm-Non-Farm Migration in the Southeast: A Cost-Returns Analysis,”Joumal of Farm Economics, 48:1–11.
12.
DjajicS.1986“International Migration Remittances and Welfare in a Dependent Economy,”Journal of Development Economics, 21:229–234.
13.
FawcettJames T.1989“Networks, Linkages and Migration Systems,”International Migration Review, 23(3):670–680.
14.
FrankA. G.1966“The Development of Underdevelopment,”Monthly Review Press, 18:17–31.
15.
FreemanG. P.1979Immigrant Labor and Racial Conflict in Industrialized Societies. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
16.
GreenwoodM. J.1975“Research on Internal Migration in the U.S.: A Survey,”Journal of Economic Literature, 13:397–433.
17.
HugoG.1990“Recent International Migration Trends in Asia: Some Implications for Australia.” Paper presented at the Australian Population Association Conference, Melbourne.
18.
ICPD (International Conference on Population and Development)1994Migrants, Refugees and International Cooperation. Geneva: ILO, IOM, and UNHCR.
19.
InglisC.WuC.T.1990“The “New” Migration of Asian Skill and Capital in the Asia-Pacific Region: Its Implications for New Directions in Theory and Research.” In Patterns of Migration in Southeast Asia. Edited by ReedR., Occasional Paper No. 16, Center for South and Southeast Asian Studies, University of California, Berkeley.
20.
JonesGavin1990“Implications for Australia of Population Trends in Asia.” Paper presented at the Australia Population Association Conference, Melbourne.
21.
KatzE.StarkO.1986“Labor Migration and Risk Aversion in Less Developed Countries,”Journal of Labor Economics, 4:131–149.
22.
KrugmanP.BhagwatiJ. N.1976“The Decision to Migrate: A Survey.” In The Brain Drain and Taxation, Vol 2. Edited by BhagwatiJ.N., Amsterdam: North-Holland.
23.
LaubyJ.StarkO.1988“Individual Migration as a Family Strategy: Young Women in the Philippines”, Population Studies, 42:139–149.
24.
LowryIra S.1966Migration and Metropolitan Growth. San Francisco: Chandler.
25.
LundahlM.LundahlM.1985“International Migration, Remittances and Reallncome: Effects on the Source Country,”Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 87:647–657.
26.
MacmillenM.J.1982“The Economic Effects of International Migration,”Journal of Common Market Studies, 20(3):245–267.
27.
MartinP.L.HoustonM.F.1979“The Future of International Labor Migration,”Journal of International Affairs, 33(2):311–333.
28.
MasseyD.1993“Theories of International Migration: A Review and Appraisal,”Population and Development Review, 19(3):431–466.
29.
MasseyD.1988“Economic Development and International Migration in Comparative Perspective,”Population and Development Review, 14:383–414.
30.
MasseyD.1987Return to Atzlan: The Social Process of International Migration from Western Mexico. Berkeley: University of California Press.
31.
MyrdalG.1957Economic Theory and Underdeveloped Regions. London: Gerald Duckworth.
32.
OngP.ChengL.1992“Migration of Highly Educated Asians and Global Dynamics,”Asian Pacific Migration journal, 1(3–4):543–567.
33.
Pang Eng Fong and Linda Lim1982“Restructuring in Singapore.” In Singapore Banking and Finance 1981/82 Yearbook. Singapore.
PioreM. J.1979Birds of Passage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
36.
PortesA.1981“Modes of Structural Incorporation and Present Theories of Labor Immigration.” In Global Trends in Migration. Edited by KritzMary M.KeelyCharles B.TomasiSilvano M., New York: Center for Migration Studies.
37.
PortesA.1987“One Field, Many Views: Competing Theories of International Migration.” In Pacific Bridges: The New Immigration from Asia and the Pacific Islands. Edited by FawcettJ.CariñoB., New York: Center for Migration Studies.
38.
PortesA.WaltonJ.1981Labor, Class, and the International System. New York: Academic Press.
39.
PrebischRaoul1950The Economic Development of Latin America and its Principal Problems. New York: United Nations.
40.
PryorRobin J.1981“Integrating International and Internal Migration Theories.” In Global Trends in Migration. Edited by KritzMary M.KeelyCharles B.TomasiSilvano M., New York: Center for Migration Studies.
41.
PsacharapoulosG.1972The Returns to Education: An International Comparison. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
42.
QuibriaM.G.1990“On International Migration and the Social Welfare Function,”Bulletin of Economic Research, 42:141–153.
43.
QuibriaM.G.1989“International Migration and Real Wages: Is There Any Neoclassical Ambiguity?,”Journal of Development Economics, 31:177–183.
44.
RichmondA. H.VermaR. P.1978“The Economic Adaptation of Immigrants: A New Theoretical Perspective,”International Migration Review, 12(1):3–38.
45.
RuebensEdwin P.1981Interpreting Migration: Current Models and a New Integration. New York University, New York Research Program in Inter-American Affairs, Occasional Paper No. 29.
46.
RussellS. StantonTeitelbaumM.S.1993International Migration and International Trade. World Bank Discussion Paper No. 160, Washington, D.C.: World Bank.
47.
SassenS.1991The Global City: New York, London, Tokyo. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
48.
SassenS.1988The Mobility of Labor and Capital: A Study in International Investment and Labor Flow. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
49.
SingerH. W.1968“The Distribution of Gains Between Investing and Borrowing Countries.” In Expansion of World Trade and the Growth of National Economics. Edited by WecksteinRichard S., New York: Haiper and Row.
50.
SjaastadL. A.1962“The Costs and Returns of Human Migration,”Journal of Political Economy, 70:580–593.
51.
SpeareAldenJr.1974a“Residential Satisfaction as an Intervening Variable in Residential Mobility,”Demography, 11.
52.
SpeareAldenJr.1974b“The Relevance of Models of Internal Migration for ther Study of International Migration.” In International Migration: Proceedings of a Seminar on Demographic Research in Relation to International Migration. Edited by TapinosG., Paris: CICRED.
53.
SpeareAldenJr.1971“A Cost-Benefit Model of Rural-to-Urban Migration in Taiwan,”Population Studies, 25:117–131.
54.
StahlC.W.1986International Labor Migration: A Study of the ASEAN Economies. New York: Center for Migration Studies.
55.
StahlC.W.1982“Labor Emigration and Economic Development,”International Migration Review, 16(4):869–899.
56.
StalkerPeter1994The Work of Strangers: A Survey of International Labor Migration. Geneva: ILO.
57.
StarkOded1991The Migration of Labor. Cambridge: Basil Blackwell.
58.
StarkO.BloomD.E.1985“The New Economics of Labor Migration,”American Economic Review, 75:173–178.
59.
TeitelbaumM.S.1993“Effects of Economic Development on Emigration Pressures in Sending Countries.” In The Changing Course of International Migration. Paris: OECD.
60.
TodaroMichael P.1969“A Model of Labor Migration and Urban Unemploymen tin Less Developed Countries,”American Economic Review, 59:138–148.
61.
WolpertJulian1966“Migration as an Adjustment to Environmental Stress,”Journal of Social Issues, 22:92–102.
62.
WolpertJulian1965“Behavioral Aspects of the Decision to Migrate,”Papers of the Regional Science Association, 15:159–169.
63.
WongK.Y.1986“The Economic Analysis of International Migration: A Generalization,”Canadian Journal of Economics, 19:356–362.
64.
World Bank1993World Development Report 1993. New York: Oxford University Press.
65.
ZolbergA.1989“The Next Waves: Migration Theory for a Changing World,”International Migration Review, 23(3):403–430.
