International marriage migration has rapidly transformed South Korea’s rural areas. Using Q methodology, this study examines how multicultural farm families perceive and adapt to rural life amid cultural, social, and economic challenges. Data from 29 participants reveals three adaptation types: (1) Satisfied Settlers, who build belonging through family and community relationships, (2) Cultural Challengers, who face language and economic barriers, and (3) Support Seekers, who rely on external support, particularly for their children’s education. The findings highlight diverse rural multicultural experiences and support a subjectivity-centered approach, with policy implications for more context-sensitive, family-oriented integration across the Asia–Pacific region.
BartramD (2011) Economic migration and happiness: comparing immigrants’ and natives’ happiness gains from income. Social Indicators Research103: 57–76. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-010-9696-2
HerringtonNCooganJ (2011) Q methodology: an overview. Research in Teacher Education1(2): 24–28.
7.
HwangM (2016) The effect of multicultural family support service: examining integration with immigrant wives in South Korea. Journal of Social Service Research42: 630–650. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/01488376.2016.1216917
JangEKRyuJA (2015) A qualitative study on husbands’ experiences in marital conflicts in multicultural families: focusing on critical incidents, development and coping. Rural Guidance and Development22(2): 117–133. Available at: https://scholar.kyobobook.co.kr/article/detail/4010024590180
JohnB (2016) Comparative analysis of Canadian multiculturalism policy and the multiculturalism policies of other countries. Psychology in Russia: State of the Art9(1): 4–23. Available at: https://doi.org/10.11621/pir.2016.0101
13.
KilBOLeeSLeeSY, et al. (2020) Theory and Application of Q Methodology. Daejeon. Chungnam National University Press.
14.
KimHK (2008) Q Methodology. Seoul: Communication Books.
KimJI (2018) Local government multicultural family support ordinance and adaptation strategies of multicultural family: focusing on the case of Gyeonggi-do. The Korean Journal of Local Government Studies21(4): 267–292. Available at: https://doi.org/10.20484/klog.21.4.12
KimVStreichP (2020) Tabunka Kyōsei without immigration policy: the role of centers for international exchange and their challenges. Contemporary Japan32(2): 174–196. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/18692729.2020.1770477
20.
Korea Rural Economic Institute (2010) 농촌의 다문화가정 실태와 정책방향 (The current status and policy directions for multicultural families in rural areas). [In Korean].
21.
Korea Rural Economic Institute (2020) 농촌 다문화가정 청소년의 사회적응에 영향을 미치는 요인과 시사점. (Factors Affecting Social Adaptation of Adolescents in Rural Multicultural Families and Implications). Available at:https://repository.krei.re.kr/handle/2018.oak/25174. [In Korean].
22.
LeeHS (2014) A qualitative study on multicultural families’ female marriage immigrants’ difficulties in life in Korea. Korean Society of Agricultural Extension21: 143–176. Available at: https://doi.org/10.12653/jecd.2014.21.1.0143
23.
LeeYOJangDHLeeSM (2022) A study on the development of public library programs for supporting the education of children from multicultural families. Journal of the Korean Library and Information Science Society53(2): 137–163.
24.
LimCH (2014) An empirical study on the marital adjustment of remarried Korean husbands in multicultural families: focused on coping behaviors. Korean Journal of Family Welfare19(1): 27–54. Available at: https://doi.org/10.13049/kfwa.2014.19.1.27
25.
MansouriFModoodT (2021) The complementarity of multiculturalism and interculturalism: theory backed by Australian evidence. Ethnic and Racial Studies44(16): 1–20. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2020.1713391
MoSHLeeIHLeeSH, et al. (2008) A Study on the Problems of Multicultural Families and Policy Support Measures. Chungcheongnam-do: Chungnam Development Institute. Available at: https://www.riss.kr/link?id=M12347276
28.
Multicultural Families Support Act (2008) Korea Legislation Research Institute. Act No. 8937, Mar. 21, 2008. Available at: https://elaw.klri.re.kr
29.
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) (2024) International Migration Outlook 2024. Paris: OECD Publishing.
30.
PaikYKimS (1998) An observation on Q-methodology studies. Journal of Education & Culture4: 47–71.
ParkSHHwangboM (2015) A literature review of the language of children from multicultural families. Communication Sciences & Disorders24(4): 57–70.
33.
ParkDSAhnSKimNH, et al. (2018) 농촌 사회통합 실태와 정책 개선방안: 다문화가족과 귀농·귀촌인 대상 심층연구 (Current Situation of Rural Social Cohesion and Policy Improvement Measures: An in-depth Study on Multicultural Families and Rural In-migrants). Korea Rural Economic Institute. Available at: https://www.krei.re.kr/krei/page/53?cmd=view&biblioId=518886&pageIndex=1. [In Korean].
34.
ParkSYKimSCho ChungHI (2021) Adaptation process of Korean fathers within multicultural families in Korea. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health18(11): 5935. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18115935
35.
RamloSE (2020) Divergent viewpoints about the statistical stage of a mixed method: qualitative versus quantitative orientations. International Journal of Research and Method in Education43(1): 93–111. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727x.2019.1626365
36.
RamosAKSuDLanderL, et al. (2015) Stress factors contributing to depression among Latino migrant farmworkers in Nebraska. Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health17: 1627–1634. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10903-015-0201-5
37.
RobbinsPKruegerR (2000) Beyond bias? The promise and limits of Q method in human geography. The Professional Geographer52(4): 636–648. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/0033-0124.00252
38.
SeoJAEomJA (2016) The mediating effect of mothers’ depression on the relationship between fathers’ parenting involvement in multicultural families and young children’s social development. Journal of Early Childhood Education & Educare Administration20(2): 419–447. Available at: https://www.dbpia.co.kr/pdf/pdfView.do?nodeId=NODE07446006
39.
SeolDHKimYTKimHM, et al. (2005) Foreign Wives’ Lives in Korea: Focusing on the Policy of Welfare and Health. Seoul: Ministry of Health and Welfare. Available at: https://buly.kr/6XlZp3q
40.
SonGOKimMJ (2022) The effects of mothers’ parenting anxiety and fathers’ parenting participation on peer relationships of infants from multicultural families: the mediating effect of the mother–child relationship and infant’s playfulness. Journal of Children’s Literature and Education Research23(3): 249–272. Available at: https://doi.org/10.22154/jcle.23.3.11
41.
Statistics Korea (2023) 2022 Multicultural Population Dynamics Statistics. Korea: Statistics Korea.
StennerPWattsSWorrellM, et al. (2008) The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research in Psychology, 215–239.
44.
WeineS (2011) Developing preventive mental health interventions for refugee families in resettlement. Family Process50(3): 410–430. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1545-5300.2011.01366.x
45.
YeunYRYangS (2012) Effects of a marital relationship enrichment program on communication, conflict resolution, and marital satisfaction in multicultural couples. Journal of Korean Academy of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing21(3): 250–261. Available at: https://doi.org/10.12934/jkpmhn.2012.21.3.250
46.
YoonHHJeonSK (2015) Study on the status of policy implementation and improvement of agencies delivering multicultural families support policy: focus on Daejeon metro city. Journal of Multicultural Contents Studies18: 363–394.
