This paper examines the factors motivating scientists and engineers to return to India after working in information technology and biotechnology companies in the United States of America (USA). Drawing on a qualitative study, the findings reveal that decisions to return are influenced by family considerations, career opportunities, entrepreneurial aspirations, challenges associated with immigration to the USA, and an affinity for Indian culture. Conversely, migrants who choose to remain in the USA cite superior career prospects, favorable work environments, and a high quality of life. Despite their differing choices, both returnees and stayers actively maintain transnational professional relationships with scientists and engineers in the USA and India, respectively, fostering connections across borders.
BensonMO’ReillyK (2009) Migration and the search for a better way of life: a critical exploration of lifestyle migration. The Sociological Review57(4): 608–625.
6.
BhagwatiJN (1979) International migration of the highly skilled: economics, ethics and taxes. Third World Quarterly1(3): 17–30.
BolzmanCFibbiRVialM (2006) What to do after retirement? Elderly migrants and the question of return. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies32(8): 1359–1375.
9.
BorjasGJ (1989) Economic theory and international migration. International Migration Review23(3): 457–485.
10.
BorjasGJBratsbergB (1996) Who leaves? The outmigration of the foreign-born. The Review of Economics and Statistics78(1): 165–176.
11.
BoydM (1989) Family and personal networks in international migration: recent developments and new agendas. International Migration Review23(3): 638–670.
12.
BrettellCB (2003) Anthropology and Migration: Essays on Transnationalism, Ethnicity, and Identity. AltaMira Press.
13.
CarlingJErdalMB (2014) Return migration and transnationalism: how are the two connected?International Migration52(6): 2–12.
14.
ChackoE (2007) From brain drain to brain gain: reverse migration to Bangalore and Hyderabad, India’s globalizing high tech cities. Geojournal68(2/3): 131–140. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41148150
15.
ChristouAKofmanE (2022) Gender and Migration. IMISCOE Short Reader.
16.
ConstantAMasseyDS (2002) Return migration by German guestworkers: neoclassical versus new economic theories. International Migration40(4): 5–38.
17.
CoutinSB (2005) Being en route. American Anthropologist107(2): 195–206.
18.
CzaikaMde HaasH (2014) The globalization of migration: has the world become more migratory?International Migration Review48(2): 283–323.
de HaasH (2010) Migration Transitions: A Theoretical Framework and Empirical Inquiry into the Development Drivers of International Migration. International Migration Institute. https://www.migrationinstitute.org/publications/wp-24-10
21.
de HaasHFokkemaTFihriMF (2015) Return migration as failure or success?International Migration & Integration16(2): 415–429.
22.
DocquierFRapoportH (2012) Globalization, brain drain, and development. Journal of Economic Literature50(3): 681–730.
GillespieBJMulderCHvon ReichertC (2022) The role of family and friends in return migration and its labor market outcomes. Population Research and Policy Review41: 115–138.
25.
GrantEKVanderkampJ (1986) Repeat migration and disappointment. Canadian Journal of Regional Science9(3): 299–322.
26.
HenninkMKaiserBN (2022) Sample sizes for saturation in qualitative research: a systematic review of empirical tests. Social Science & Medicine292(114523): 1–10.
27.
JacobsE (2024) On the up and up: the job mobility of skilled return migrants. Social Forces103(4): 1538–1559.
28.
KaleDWieldDChatawayJ (2008) Diffusion of knowledge through migration of scientific labour in India. Science and Public Policy35(6): 417–430.
KhadriaB (1999) The Migration of Knowledge Workers: Second Generation Effects of India’s Brian Drain. Sage Publications.
31.
KhadriaB (2003) Case-study of the Indian scientific Diaspora. In: BarréRHernándezVMeyerJB, et al. (eds) Diasporas Scientifiques (1–). IRD Éditions.
32.
KhadriaB (2004) Migration of highly skilled Indians: case studies of IT and the health professionals. In: OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers, No. 2004/06. OECD Publishing.
33.
KhadriaB (2010) Adversary analysis and the quest for global development: optimizing the dynamic conflict of interest in transnational migration. In: SchillerNGFaistT (eds) Development, and Transnationalization: A Critical Stance. Berghahn Books, pp. 176–203.
34.
KhadriaB (2012) India Migration Report 2010-2011: The Americas. Cambridge University Press.
35.
KingR (2012) Theories and typologies of migration: an overview and a primer. In: RighardE (ed) International Migration and Ethnic Relations. Malmő Institute for Studies of Migration, Diversity and Welfare, pp. 1–48.
36.
KingRKuschminderK (2022) Introduction: definitions, typologies and theories of return migration. In: KingRKuschminderK (eds) Handbook of Return Migration. Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 1–23.
37.
KõuAMulderCHBaileyA (2017) For the sake of the family and future: the linked lives of highly skilled Indian migrants. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies43(16): 2788–2805.
MasseyDS (1990) Social structure, household strategies, and the cumulative causation of migration. Population Index56(1): 3–26. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3644186
40.
MayrKGiovanniP (2008) Return migration as channel of brain gain. NBER Working Paper No. 14039. May. Available at. https://www.nber.org/papers/w14039
41.
National Science Board (2024) Science and Engineering Indicators 2024: The State of U.S. Science and Engineering. Report. Available at. https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsb20243
42.
OntiverosML (2017) H-1B visas, outsourcing and body shops: a continuum of exploitation for high tech workers. Berkeley Journal of Employment and Labor Law38(1): 1–47. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26356920
43.
PanagariyaA (2010) India: The Emerging Giant. Oxford University Press.
44.
PessarPRMahlerSJ (2003) Transnational migration: bringing gender in. International Migration Review37(3): 812–846.
SaarMSaarE (2020) Can the concept of lifestyle migration be applied to return migration? The case of Estonians in the UK. International Migration58(2): 52–66.
48.
SabharwalMVarmaR (2017) Grass is greener on the other side: return migration of engineers and scientists in academia. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society37(1): 34–44.
49.
SabharwalMVarmaR (2018) International collaboration: experiences of Indian academics after returning from the United States. Perspectives on Global Development & Technology17(4): 593–613.
50.
SabharwalMVarmaR (2020) Transnationalism and return migration of scientists and engineers from the United States to India. In: SahooAKPurkayasthaB (eds) Routledge Handbook of Indian Transnationalism. Routledge, pp. 54–66.
51.
SabharwalMVarmaRNoorZ (2021) Ethnic organizations and adaptation: a case study of Indian immigrant engineers in the US. Perspectives on Global Development & Technology20(4): 317–335.
52.
SaxenianA (2005) From brain drain to brain circulation: transnational communities and regional upgrading in India and China. Studies in Comparative International Development40(2): 35–61.
53.
SilveyR (2006) Geographies of gender and migration: spatializing social differences. International Migration Review40(1): 64–81.
54.
VarmaR (2006) Harbingers of Global Change: India’s Techno-Immigrants in the United States. Lexington Books.
55.
VarmaR (2007) Changing borders and realities: emigration of Indian scientists and engineers to the United States. Perspectives on Global Development & Technology6(1): 1–18.
56.
VarmaR (2020) To be or not to be on H-1B: engineers from India in the United States. Perspectives on Global Development & Technology19(2): 281–302.
57.
VarmaR (2021) Dissecting culture at work: conversation with Indian immigrant scientists & engineers in the US technology sector. Technology in Society66(1): 1–8.
58.
VarmaR (2022) Tech coolies: Indian scientists and engineers entering U.S. on H-1B visa. In: SaucedoLRodriguezR (eds) Race, Gender and Contemporary International Labor Migration: 21st Century Coolies?Edward Elgar Press, pp. 89–108.
59.
VarmaR (2024) Transnational innovators: Indian immigrants in shaping entrepreneurship in the U.S. tech sector. In: ElmiMCukierWChavoushiZC, et al. (eds) Immigrants Entrepreneurship: Palgrave Studies in Equity, Diversity, Inclusion, and Indigenization in Business. Palgrave MacMillan, pp. 413–435.
