Trustees,delegates and responsiveness: An interpretive case study of Chinese New Zealanders’ participation in representative politics

Abstract

Political representation is vital for democracies, and responsiveness lies at the heart of representation. Ethnic minorities’ assessments of elected representatives’ responsiveness reflect their participation in representative politics. Chinese New Zealanders are the largest Asian community in New Zealand. Based on 38 semi-structured, in-depth interviews, I explored how Chinese New Zealanders understood their relationships with elected representatives and their assessments of representatives’ responsiveness. For multiple reasons, interviewees adopted the delegate, trustee or dynamic representation models. I observed the age-based and homeland-based divergencies regarding interviewees’ preferred representation models. Interviewees of each ilk adopted different criteria to evaluate representatives’ responsiveness.

Keywords

political representation representatives’ responsiveness Chinese New Zealanders delegates trustees representative democracy

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alonso

Ruiz-Rufino

(2007) Political representation and ethnic conflict in new democracies. European Journal of Political Research 46(2): 237-267. DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-6765.2007.00693.x.

Banducci

Donovan

Karp

(2004) Minority representation, empowerment, and participation. The Journal of Politics 66(2): 534-556. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2508.2004.00163.x.

Barker

Carman

(2012) Representing Red and Blue: How the Culture Wars Change the Way Citizens Speak and Politicians Listen. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Barker

McMillan

(2017) Factors influencing the electoral participation of Asian immigrants in New Zealand. Political Science 69(2): 139-160. DOI: 10.1080/00323187.2017.1348236.

Bellamy

Castiglione

(2013) Three models of democracy, political community and representation in the EU. Journal of European Public Policy 20(2): 206-223. DOI: 10.1080/13501763.2013.746118.

Bengtsson

Mattila

(2009) Direct democracy and its critics: Support for direct democracy and ‘stealth’ democracy in Finland. West European Politics 32(5): 1031-1048. DOI: 10.1080/01402380903065256.

Bilodeau

(2014) Is democracy the only game in town? Tension between immigrants’ democratic desires and authoritarian imprints. Democratization 21(2): 359-381. DOI: 10.1080/13510347.2012.712515.

Bloemraad

Schönwälder

(2013) Immigrant and ethnic minority representation in Europe: Conceptual challenges and theoretical approaches. West European Politics 36(3): 564-579. DOI: 10.1080/01402382.2013.773724.

Borowiak

(2011) Disciplining democracy: The principal–agent model of accountability. In: Borowiak

(ed) Accountability and Democracy: The Pitfalls and Promise of Popular Control. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 53-76.

10.

Bowler

(2017) Trustees, delegates, and responsiveness in comparative perspective. Comparative Political Studies 50(6): 766-793. DOI: 10.1177/0010414015626447.

11.

Braun

Clarke

(2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3(2): 77-101. DOI: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.

12.

Butler

(2014) Representing the Advantaged: How Politicians Reinforce Inequality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

13.

Carman

(2007) Assessing preferences for political representation in the US. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 17(1): 1-19. DOI: 10.1080/13689880601132497.

14.

Charmaz

(2014) Constructing Grounded Theory (2^nd edn). London: Sage.

15.

Dalton

(2013) Citizen Politics: Public Opinion and Political Parties in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Washington, DC: CQ Press.

16.

Disch

(2011) Toward a mobilization conception of democratic representation. American Political Science Review 105(1): 100-114. DOI: 10.1017/S0003055410000602.

17.

Doherty

(2013) To whom do people think representatives should respond: Their district or the country?. Public Opinion Quarterly 77(1): 237-255. DOI: 10.1093/poq/nfs052.

18.

Dovi

(2002) Preferable descriptive representatives: Will just any woman, black, or Latino do?. American Political Science Review 96(4): 729-743. DOI: 10.1017/S0003055402000412.

19.

Dovi

(2012) The Good Representative. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.

20.

Dovi

(2018) Political representation. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 29 August. Available at: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2018/entries/political-representation/.

21.

(2022) An interpretive case study of Chinese New Zealanders’ political participation in Aotearoa. PhD Thesis, University of Auckland, New Zealand. Available at: https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/server/api/core/bitstreams/dadebc81-ae43-4c79-8197-ba4fa738442e/content.

22.

Fox

Shotts

(2009) Delegates or trustees? A theory of political accountability. The Journal of Politics 71(4): 1225-1237. DOI: 10.1017/s0022381609990260.

23.

Gailmard

(2014) Accountability and principal–agent theory. In: Bovens

Goodin

Schillemans

(eds) Oxford Handbook of Public Accountability. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 90-105.

24.

Gilardi

Braun

(eds) (2006) Delegation in Contemporary Democracies. London: Routledge.

25.

Hayes

Hibbing

(2017) The symbolic benefits of descriptive and substantive representation. Political Behavior 39: 31-50. DOI: 10.1007/s11109-016-9345-9.

26.

Higgs

(2017/18) Principal-agent theory and representative government. The Independent Review 22(3): 479-480.

27.

Huang

(2023) The power of habit and electoral participation of ethnic Chinese in New Zealand. PhD Thesis, Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand. Available at: https://openaccess.wgtn.ac.nz/articles/thesis/The_power_of_habit_and_electoral_participation_of_ethnic_Chinese_in_New_Zealand/22261522/1/files/39564493.pdf.

28.

International Organization for Migration (IOM) (2024) The World Migration Report 2024. Report. Geneva: IOM. Available at: https://publications.iom.int/books/world-migration-report-2024.

29.

(2005) Chinese - The first immigrants. Te Ara – The Encyclopedia of New Zealand, 08 February. Available at: https://teara.govt.nz/en/chinese/page-2.

30.

Jacobs

Shapiro

(2000) Politicians Don't Pander: Political Manipulation and the Loss of Democratic Responsiveness. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

31.

Jacobs

Schillemans

(2016) Media and public accountability: Typology and exploration. Policy & Politics 44(1): 23-40. DOI: 10.1332/030557315X14431855320366.

32.

Jiménez

(2010) Replenished Ethnicity: Mexican Americans, Immigration, and Identity. Los Angeles: University of California Press.

33.

Le Lohé

(2004) Ethnic minority participation and representation in the British electoral system. In: Saggar

(ed) Race and British Electoral Politics. London: Routledge, pp. 101-124.

34.

Mansbridge

(2003) Rethinking representation. American Political Science Review 97(4): 515-528. DOI: 10.1017/S0003055403000856.

35.

Mansbridge

(2009) A “selection model” of political representation. Journal of Political Philosophy 17(4): 369-398. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9760.2009.00337.x.

36.

McMillan

(2020) The intersecting electoral politics of immigration and inequality in Aotearoa/New Zealand. In: Simon-Kumar

Collins

Friesen

(eds) Intersections of Inequality, Migration and Diversification: The Politics of Mobility in Aotearoa/New Zealand. London: Springer, pp. 87-108.

37.

Näsström

(2015) Democratic representation beyond election. Constellations 22(1): 1-12. DOI: 10.1111/1467-8675.12123.

38.

Öhberg

Naurin

(2016) Party-constrained policy responsiveness: A survey experiment on politicians’ response to citizen-initiated contacts. British Journal of Political Science 46(4): 785-797. DOI: 10.1017/S0007123415000010.

39.

Park

(2006) Political participation of “Asian” New Zealanders: A case study of ethnic Chinese and Korean New Zealanders. PhD Thesis, University of Auckland, New Zealand. Available at: https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/handle/2292/393.

40.

Pearson

Citrin

(2006) The political assimilation of the fourth wave. In: Lee

Ramakrishnan

Ramirez

(eds) Transforming Politics, Transforming America: The Political and Civic Incorporation of Immigrants in the United States. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press, pp. 217-242.

41.

Pitkin

(1972) The Concept of Representation. Los Angeles: University of California Press.

42.

Powell

Jr GB

(2004) The quality of democracy: The chain of responsiveness. Journal of Democracy 15(4): 91-105. DOI: 10.1353/jod.2004.0070.

43.

Schildkraut

(2013) The complicated constituency: A study of immigrant opinions about political representation. Politics, Groups, and Identities 1(1): 26-47. DOI: 10.1080/21565503.2012.757445.

44.

Soroka

Wlezien

(2010) Degrees of Democracy: Politics, Public Opinion, and Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

45.

StatsNZ (n.d.) Chinese ethnic group. Available at: https://www.stats.govt.nz/tools/2018-census-ethnic-group-summaries/chinese.

46.

StatsNZ (2024) 2023 Census population counts (by ethnic group, age and Māori descent) and dwelling counts, 29 May. Available at: https://www.stats.govt.nz/information-releases/2023-census-population-counts-by-ethnic-group-age-and-maori-descent-and-dwelling-counts/#:~:text=New%20Zealand's%20population%20continues%20to%20diversify&text=887%2C493%20people%20(17.8%20percent)%20as,people%20(1.9%20percent)%20as%20MELAA.

47.

Strøm

(2000) Delegation and accountability in parliamentary democracies. European Journal of Political Research 37(3): 261-289. DOI: 10.1111/1475-6765.00513.

48.

Tongco

MDC

(2007) Purposive sampling as a tool for informant selection. Ethnobotany Research and Applications 5: 147-158. DOI: 10.17348/era.5.0.147-158.

49.

van der Zwan

Lubbers

Eisinga

(2019) The political representation of ethnic minorities in the Netherlands: Ethnic minority candidates and the role of party characteristics. Acta Politica 54: 245-267. DOI: 10.1057/s41269-018-0085-1.

50.

Yin

(2012) Applications of Case Study Research. London: Sage Publication.

51.

Zuber

(2015) Reserved seats, political parties, and minority representation. Ethnopolitics 14(4): 390-403. DOI: 10.1080/17449057.2015.1032007.