A gendered analysis of Palestinian refugee women’s experiences of migration from Syria to Türkiye

Abstract

After the outbreak of the conflict in 2011, millions of people fled Syria across its borders. This gave way to a new category of people, “Syrian refugees.” While this categorical understanding constitutes the basis for legal entitlements, it homogenizes all fleeing Syria and results in concealing the differential experiences and vulnerabilities of particular groups. The paper challenges this blanket categorization by focusing on the migration experiences of Palestinian women from Syria to Türkiye around the concepts of biological and social reproduction which represent the largely neglected aspects concerning the process of forced migration. By drawing on six women’s experiences, the paper concludes that the homogeneity of the Syrian migrants is an illusion; women’s migrations are shaped through their gendered and ethnic history; and women face gender-specific challenges and opportunities in both home and host countries. We particularly argue that policies on border control and migrant’s integration fail to consider the subjective conditions and needs of particular groups within the Syrian migrants.

Keywords

Palestinians women refugees biological reproduction social reproduction relations of care

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Akbulat

Sayın

(2018) Transnational immigrant communities and ethnic solidarity: The case of Samsun and Syrian Circassians. Bingöl University Journal of Social Sciences Institute 8(16): 371–394. DOI: 10.29029/busbed.395566.

Albasoos

Al-Maqbali

(2017) An overview of the conflict in Syria. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science 6(1): 47–54. DOI: 10.20525/ijrbs.v6i1.670.

Antoun

(1991) Introduction: Ethnicity, clientship, and class: Their changing meaning. In: Antoun

Quataert

(eds) Syria: Society, Culture, and Polity. Albany: State University of New York Press, pp. 1–12.

Archambault

(2010) Women left behind? Migration, spousal separation, and the autonomy of rural women in Ugweno, Tanzania. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 35(4): 919–942. DOI: 10.1086/651042.

Arslan

Can

Wilson

(2020) Do border walls work? Security, insecurity and everyday economy in the Turkish-Syrian borderlands. Turkish Studies 22(5): 744–772. DOI: 10.1080/14683849.2020.1841642.

Atasü-Topcuoğlu

(2019) Syrian refugee entrepreneurship in Turkey: Integration and the use of immigrant capital in the informal economy. Social Inclusion 7(4): 200–210. DOI: 10.17645/si.v7i4.2346.

Baklacioğlu

NÖ

Kıvılcım

(2015) Sürgünde Toplumsal Cinsiyet: İstanbul’da Suriyeli Kadın ve LGBTİ Mülteciler [Gender in Exile: Syrian Women and LGBTI Refugees in Istanbul]. Istanbul: Derin Yayınları [In Turkish].

Balkılıç

Teke Lloyd

(2021) Does Islamic inclusion of Syrians represent a real challenge to Europe's security approach? Dilemmas of the AKP's Syrian refugee discourse. Turkish Studies 22(3): 357–379. DOI: 10.1080/14683849.2020.1774372.

Barın

(2015) Türkiye’deki Suriyeli kadınların toplumsal bağlamda yaşadıkları sorunlar ve çözüm önerileri [Problems faced by Syrian women in Türkiye in the social context and suggestions for solutions]. Göç Araştırmaları Dergisi 1(2): 10–56. Available at: https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/gad/issue/43299/526437 [In Turkish].

10.

Biehl

Danış

(2020) Giriş: Toplumsal cinsiyet perspektifinden Türkiye’de göç araştırmaları [Introduction: Migration research in Türkiye from a gender perspective]. In: Biehl

Danış

(eds) Toplumsal Cinsiyet Perspektifinden Türkiye’de Göç Araştırmaları [Migration Research in Türkiye from a Gender Perspective]. Istanbul: SU Gender and Göç Araştırmaları Derneği, pp. 8–17 [In Turkish].

11.

Bilgin

(2021) Göç'ü güç'e dönüştüren kadınlar: Antakya, Gaziantep ve İstanbul'da çalışan Suriyeli göçmen kadınlarla yapılan niteliksel bir araştırma [Women turning migration into empowerment: A qualitative research on working migrant Syrian women in Antakya, Gaziantep and Istanbul]. MA Thesis, Maltepe University, Türkiye [In Turkish].

12.

Brah

(1996) Cartographies of Diaspora: Contesting Identities. London: Routledge.

13.

Cankurtaran

Albayrak

(2019) Suriye’den Türkiye’ye Kadın Olmak [Being a Woman from Syria to Türkiye]. Ankara: Merdiven Yayın [In Turkish].

14.

Carling

(2007) Migration control and migrant fatalities at the Spanish-African borders. International Migration Review 41(2): 316–343. DOI: 10.1111/j.1747-7379.2007.00070.x.

15.

Castles

(2003) Towards a sociology of forced migration and social transformation. Sociology 37(1): 13–34. DOI: 10.1177/0038038503037001384.

16.

Cenkci

Nazik

(2018) Sığınmacı ve mülteci kadınların yaşadığı sorunlar ve sunulan sağlık hizmetleri [The problems of asylum seeker and refugee women and health services offered]. Anadolu Hemşirelik ve Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi 21(4): 293-299. Available at: https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/ataunihem/issue/41815/343251 [In Turkish].

17.

Çetin

(2016) Suriyeli mültecilerin işgücüne katılımları ve entegrasyon: Adana-Mersin örneği [Labor force participation of Syrian refugees and integration: Case of Adana and Mersin cities]. Gaziantep University Journal of Social Sciences 15(4): 1001–1016. DOI: 10.21547/jss.265320 [In Turkish].

18.

Chang

(2021) The economically rich refugees: A case study of the business operations of Istanbul-based Syrian refugee businesspeople. International Migration 60(3): 1–14. DOI: 10.1111/imig.12886.

19.

Chen

YYB

(2022) International migrants’ right to sexual and reproductive health care. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics 157(1): 210–215. DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.14149.

20.

Cooke

(1996) Women and the War Story. Berkeley, Los Angeles and Oxford: University of California Press.

21.

Dağtaş

(2018) Inhabiting difference across religion and gender: Displaced women’s experiences at Turkey’s border with Syria. Refuge 34(1): 50–59. DOI: 10.7202/1050854ar.

22.

Deniz

AÇ

Ekinci

Hülür

(2016) Bizim Müstakbel Hep Harap Oldu: Suriyeli Sığınmacıların Gündelik Hayatı Antep-Kilis Çevresi [Our Future is Always Ruined: Everyday Life of Syrian Refugees in the Antep-Kilis Neighborhood]. Istanbul: İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları [In Turkish].

23.

Enloe

(2004) The Curious Feminist: Searching for Women in a New Age of Empire. Berkeley, Los Angeles and London: University of California Press.

24.

Enloe

(2014) Bananas, Beaches and Bases: Making Feminist Sense of International Politics (2^nd edn). Berkeley: University of California Press.

25.

Erdener

(2017) The ways of coping with post-war trauma of Yezidi refugee women in Turkey. Women’s Studies International Forum 65: 60–70. DOI: 10.1016/j.wsif.2017.10.003.

26.

Esentaş

Güven

Güzel

(2020) Kadın mülteciler sosyal uyumu rekreasyonla aşıyor [Female refugees get through the social adaptation with recreation]. Spor Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi 5(1): 35–43. DOI: 10.25307/jssr.679285 [In Turkish].

27.

Faist

(2012) Toward a transnational methodology: Methods to address methodological nationalism, essentialism, and positionality. Revue Européenne des Migrations Internationales 28(1): 51–70. DOI: 10.4000/remi.5761.

28.

Fiddian-Qasmiyeh

Loescher

Long

et al. (2014) Introduction: Refugee and forced migration studies in transition. In: Fiddian-Qasmiyeh

Loescher

Long

et al. (eds) Oxford Handbook of Refugee and Forced Migration Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1–14.

29.

Flamini

(2013) Forced exodus: Christians in the Middle East. World Affairs 176(4): 65–71. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/43554880.

30.

Freedman

(2015) Gender and asylum in international law – The Geneva Convention revisited. In: Freedman

(ed) Gendering the International Asylum and Refugee Debate. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

31.

Freedman

(2016) Sexual and gender-based violence against refugee women: A hidden aspect of the refugee “crisis.” Reproductive Health Matters 24(47): 18–26. DOI: 10.1016/j.rhm.2016.05.003.

32.

Freedman

Kivilcim

Baklacioğlu

NÖ

(2017) Introduction: Gender, migration and exile. In: Freedman

Kivilcim

Baklacıoğlu

NÖ

(eds) A Gendered Approach to the Syrian Refugee Crisis. New York: Routledge, pp. 1–15.

33.

Gabiam

(2021) Recurring displacement, homemaking and solidarity amongst Syrian and Palestinian Syrian Refugees in Turkey. Anthropology of the Middle East 16(1): 32–48. DOI: 10.3167/ame.2021.160103.

34.

Guba

Lincoln

(1994) Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In: Denzin

Lincoln

(eds) The Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks: Sage, pp. 105–117.

35.

Guterres

(2014) Remarks by António Guterres, United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. In: Conference on the Syrian refugee situation – supporting stability in the region, Berlin, 28 October 2014, 28 October. United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR). Available at: https://www.unhcr.org/publications/remarks-antonio-guterres-united-nations-high-commissioner-refugees-conference-syrian.

36.

İçduygu

(2017) Türkiye’deki Suriyeli sığınmacılar: “siyasallaşan” bir sürecin analizi [Syrian refugees in Türkiye: Analysis of a “politicized” process]. Toplum ve Bilim 140: 27–41 [In Turkish].

37.

Kılıçaslan

(2016) Forced migration, citizenship, and space: The case of Syrian Kurdish refugees in Istanbul. New Perspectives on Turkey 54(2016): 77-95. DOI: 10.1017/npt.2016.8.

38.

Kirişci

(2014) Syrian Refugees and Turkey’s Challenges: Going Beyond Hospitality. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institute.

39.

Körükmez

Karakılıç

İZ

Daniş

(2020) Exigency, Negotiation, Change: The Work Experiences of Refugee Women and Gender Relations. Istanbul: Association for Migration Research.

40.

Korkut

(2016) Pragmatism, moral responsibility or policy change: The Syrian refugee crisis and selective humanitarianism in the Turkish refugee regime. Comparative Migration Studies 4(2): 1–20. DOI: 10.1186/s40878-015-0020-9.

41.

Koser

Pinkerton

(2002) The Social Networks of Asylum Seekers and the Dissemination of Information about Countries of Asylum. Report, Report for Home Office. London: Home Office. Available at: https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ukgwa/20110314171826/. https://rds.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/pdfs2/socialnetwork.pdf.

42.

Lan

(2008) New global politics of reproductive labor: Gendered labor and marriage migration. Sociology Compass 2(6): 1801–1815. DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-9020.2008.00176.x.

43.

Limon

(2018) Suriye’de unutulanlar: Tanıdık bir hikâye, Çerkesler ve göç [Forgotten in Syria: A familiar story, Circassians and immigration]. Göç Dergisi 5(1): 43–62. DOI: 10.33182/gd.v5i1.588 [In Turkish].

44.

Mardin

(2019) Sığınmacıların sağlık hizmetlerine erişimi: Metropol-uydu şehir karşılaştırması [Asylum seekers’ access to healthcare: Comparison between metropole-satellite city]. PhD Thesis, İstanbul Üniversitesi, Türkiye [In Turkish].

45.

Ministry of Foreign Affairs (2012) Press release regarding all diplomatic members of the Syrian embassy in Ankara being asked to leave the country, 30 May. Available at: https://www.mfa.gov.tr/no_-151_-30-may-2012_-press-release-regarding-all-diplomatic-members-of-the-syrian-embassy-in-ankara-being-asked-to-leave-the-country.en.mfa.

46.

Molyneux

(1985) Mobilization without emancipation? Women’s interests, the state, and revolution in Nicaragua. Feminist Studies 11(2): 227–254. DOI: 10.2307/3177922.

47.

Müller-Funk

(2023) Violence, life aspirations and displacement trajectories in civil war. International Migration 61(6): 207–227. DOI: 10.1111/imig.13161.

48.

Official Gazette of the Republic of Türkiye (2014) By-Law of Temporary Protection (BTP). Available at: https://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2014/10/20141022-15.htm.

49.

Özüdoğru

(2018) Yalnız yaşayan Suriyeli kadınlar: Adana örneği [Syrian women living alone: Adana sample]. OPUS Uluslararası Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi 8(15): 1132–1162. DOI: 10.26466/opus.442407 [In Turkish].

50.

Parreñas

(2001) Mothering from a distance: Emotions, gender, and intergenerational relations in Filipino transnational families. Feminist Studies 27(2): 361–390. DOI: 10.2307/3178765.

51.

Parreñas

(2012) The reproductive labour of migrant workers. Global Networks 12(2): 269–275. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0374.2012.00351.x.

52.

Pickering

(2011) Women, Borders, and Violence: Current Issues in Asylum, Forced Migration and Trafficking. Caulfield East: Springer.

53.

Pickering

Cochrane

(2013) Irregular border-crossing deaths and gender: Where, how and why women die crossing borders. Theoretical Criminology 17(1): 27–48. DOI: 10.1177/1362480612464510.

54.

Pickering

Powell

(2017) Death at sea: Migration and the gendered dimensions of border insecurity. In: Freedman

Kivilcim

Baklacıoğlu

NÖ

(eds) A Gendered Approach to the Syrian Refugee Crisis. New York: Routledge, pp. 105–124.

55.

Presidency of Migration Management (PMM) (2023) Statistics: Temporary protection. Available at: https://en.goc.gov.tr/temporary-protection27 (accessed 31 July 2023).

56.

Robinson

(2011) The Ethics of Care: A Feminist Approach to Human Security. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

57.

Sassen

(1996) Toward a feminist analytics of the global economy. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 4(1): 7–41. Available at: https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/ijgls/vol4/iss1/2/.

58.

Schmidt

Bhuyan

Lash

(2022) Transnational family separation among migrant women in Canada: An intersectional analysis. Social Work Research 46(4): 304–316. DOI: 10.1093/swr/svac020.

59.

Şimşek

(2019) Türkiye’de Suriyeli mülteci entegrasyonu: Zorlukları ve olanakları [Integration of Syrian refugees in Türkiye: Challenges and opportunities]. Ekonomi Politika ve Finans Araştırmaları Dergisi 4(2): 172–187. DOI: 10.30784/epfad.596262 [In Turkish].

60.

Şimşek

(2021) “Winners and losers of neoliberalism”: The intersection of class and race in the case of Syrian refugees in Türkiye. Ethnic and Racial Studies 44(15): 2816–2835. DOI: 10.1080/01419870.2020.1854812.

61.

Sınmaz

(2019) Çifte mülteciler: Filistinli suriyeliler [Double refugees: Palestian Syrians]. İNSAMER, 22 July. Available at: https://www.insamer.com/tr/cifte-multeciler-filistinli-suriyeliler_2293.html [In Turkish].

62.

Soguk

(1999) States and Strangers: Refugees and Displacements of Statecraft. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

63.

Steele

(2015) How Yarmouk refugee camp became the worst place in Syria. The Guardian, 05 March. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/news/2015/mar/05/how-yarmouk-refugee-camp-became-worst-place-syria.

64.

Sturken

(2002) Masculinity, courage, and sacrifice. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 28(1): 444–445. DOI: 10.1086/340881.

65.

Teke Lloyd

(2018) Beyond illegality: The gendered in-securities of illegal Armenian care workers in Turkey. Fe Dergi 10(1): 78–92. DOI: 10.1501/Fe0001_0000000198.

66.

Truong

(1996) Gender, international migration and social reproduction: Implications for theory, policy, research and networking. Asian and Pacific Migration Journal 5(1): 27–52. DOI: 10.1177/011719689600500103.

67.

Uçar

(2020) Gaziantep parça başı emek piyasasının Suriyeli kadınları: Emek, zorunlu göç ve şiddet [Syrian women in the Gaziantep piecework labor market: Labor, forced migration and violence]. In: Biehl

Danış

68.

United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) (n.d.) Syria emergency. Available at: https://data.unhcr.org/en/situations/syria (accessed 31 December 2023).

69.

United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA) (n.d.) Facts and figures. Available at: https://www.unrwa.org/syria-crisis (accessed 31 December 2023).

70.

Üstübici

(2020) Türkiye’de zorunlu göç ve toplumsal cinsiyet: Suriyeli mülteciler hakkındaki veriler üzerine bir değerlendirme [Gender and forced migration in Türkiye: A review of existing data on Syrian refugees]. Kadın/Woman 2000 21(2): 85-106. DOI: 10.33831/jws.v21i2.147 [In Turkish].

71.

van Dijk

(2022) Gendering the Geneva conventions. Human Rights Quarterly 44(2): 286–312. DOI: 10.1353/hrq.2022.0021.

72.

Weber

Pickering

(2014) Counting and accounting for deaths of asylum seekers en route to Australia. In: Brian

Laczko

(eds) Fatal Journeys: Tracking Lives Lost during Migration. Geneva: International Organization for Migration, pp. 177–203.

73.

Wimmer

Schiller

(2002) Methodological nationalism and the study of migration. European Journal of Sociology 43(2): 217–240. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/23999236.

74.

Yağmur

Aytekin

(2018) Mülteci kadınların üreme sağlığı sorunları ve çözüm önerileri [Refugee women’s reproductive health issues and suggested solutions]. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Fakültesi Elektronik Dergisi 11(1): 56-60. Available at: https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/deuhfed/issue/46786/586677 [In Turkish].

75.

Yaman

(2018) Suriyeli kadın “mültecilerin” emek ve istihdam koşulları [Labor and employment conditions of Syrian women “refugees”]. Toplum ve Hekim 33(4): 306-313. Available at: https://search.trdizin.gov.tr/tr/yayin/detay/300880/ [In Turkish].