This article focuses on relations between Syrian and local workers in the informal garment sector. It presents a framework showing the participation and integration of the Syrian refugees and the local workers’ response to this process. The findings are based on empirical materials collected in the Esenler district of Istanbul, including 60 interviews with Syrians and locals as well as participant observation in an informal garment atelier in 2020 to 2021. This study shows how Syrian refugees produce coping tactics and gain bargaining power. The research reveals different forms of relations.
BourdieuP (1977) Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2.
BourdieuP (1984) Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
3.
BourdieuP (1993a) Sociology in Question. London, Thousand Oaks and New Delhi: Sage Publications.
4.
BourdieuP (1993b) The Field of Cultural Production. Cambridge: Polity Press.
5.
BourdieuPWacquantLJD (1992) An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
6.
CeritogluEYunculerHBGTorunHet al. (2017) The impact of Syrian refugees on natives’ labor market outcomes in Turkey: Evidence from a quasi-experimental design. IZA Journal of Labor Policy6(1): 5. DOI: 10.1186/s40173-017-0082-4.
7.
de CerteauM (1988) The Practice of Everyday Life. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
8.
de CerteauM (2005) The practice of everyday life: “Making Do”: Uses and tactics. In: SpiegelGM (ed) Practicing History: New Directions in Historical Writing After the Linguistic Turn (1st edn). New York: Routledge, pp. 213–223.
9.
DedeoǧluS (2010) Visible hands - invisible women: Garment production in Turkey. Feminist Economics16(4): 1–32. DOI: 10.1080/13545701.2010.530606.
10.
DedeoğluS (2011) Türkiye’de Göçmenlerin Sosyal Dışlanması: İstanbul Hazır-Giyim Sanayinde Çalışan Azerbaycanlı Göçmen Kadınlar Örneği [Social exclusion of foreign immigrants in Türkiye: The case of Azerbaijani women workers in the Istanbul garment industry]. Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi66(1): 27–48. DOI: 10.1501/SBFder_0000002193[In Turkish].
11.
ErdoğanMM (2017) ‘Kopuş’tan Uyuma ‘Kent Mültecileri’: Suriyeli Mülteciler Ve Belediyelerin Süreç Yönetimi, İstanbul Örneği [From Displacement to Settlement 'Urban Refugees': Syrian Refugees and Municipal Process Management, Istanbul Case]. Istanbul: Marmara Belediyeler Birliği Kültür Yayınları[In Turkish].
12.
ErdoğanMM (2020) Suriyeliler Barometresi- 2019: Suriyelilerle Uyum İçinde Yaşamın Çerçevesi [Syrian Barometer-2019: Framework for Living in Harmony with Syrians]. Ankara: Orion Kitabevi[In Turkish].
13.
ErdoğanMM (2021) Syrian Barometer 2020: A Framework for Achieving Social Cohesion with Syrians in Türkiye. Altındağ: Egiten Book Publishing.
14.
ErolESalmanCAkyolEet al. (2017) Suriyeli Sığınmacıların Türkiye’de Emek Piyasasına Dahil Olma Süreçleri ve Etkileri: İstanbul Tekstil Sektörü Örneği [The Processes and Effects of Syrian Refugees’ Integration into the Labor Market in Türkiye: The Case of the Textile Industry in Istanbul]. Istanbul: Birleşik Metal-İş Yayınları[In Turkish].
İçduyguAMilletE (2016) Syrian Refugees in Türkiye: Insecure Lives in an Environment of Pseudo-integration. Working paper for Koç Üniversitesi Yayınları, August 2016. Available at: https://www.iai.it/sites/default/files/gte_wp_13.pdf.
LordoğluKAslanM (2016) En fazla Suriyeli göçmen alan beş kentin emek piyasalarında değişimi: 2011-2014 [Change of labor markets of the five cities which allow migrants at most: 2011-2014]. Çalışma ve Toplum2: 789–808. Available at: https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/2576449[In Turkish].
19.
MalinowskiB (1967) A Diary in the Strict Sense of the Term. London: Routledge.
20.
MusanteKDeWaltBR (2010) Participant Observation: A Guide for Fieldworkers. Rowman: Altamira.
21.
NimerMRottmannSB (2020) Migration regime and “Language Part of Work”: Experiences of Syrian refugees as surplus population in the Turkish labor market. Critical Sociology47(4–5): 763–776. DOI: 10.1177/0896920520964856.
22.
RajaramPK (2018) Refugees as surplus population: Race, migration and capitalist value regimes. New Political Economy23(5): 627–639. DOI: 10.1080/13563467.2017.1417372.
23.
SchierupCULikić-BrborićBWiseRDet al. (2018) Migration, civil society, and global governance: An introduction to the special issue. Globalizations15(6): 733–745. DOI: 10.1080/14747731.2018.1503840.
24.
ScottJC (1985) Weapons of the Weak: Everyday Forms of Peasant Resistance. New Haven: Yale University Press.
ToksözGÜnlütürkÇ (2011) Göç Kadınlaşıyor mu? Türkiye’ye Yönelen Düzensiz Göçe İlişkin Yazına Toplumsal Cinsiyet ve Etnisite Temelinde Bakış [Is migration feminizing? A perspective on irregular migration towards Türkiye based on gender and ethnicity]. In: SancarS (ed) Birkaç Arpa Boyu: 21. Yüzyıla Girerken Türkiye’de Feminist Çalışmalar, [A Few Steps Ahead: Feminist Studies in Türkiye Entering the 21st Century]. Istanbul: Koç Üniversitesi Yayınları, pp. 157–179[In Turkish].
27.
Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu (TUIK) (2022) 31 Aralık 2021 tarihli Adrese Dayalı Nüfus Kayıt Sistemi (ADNKS) sonuçları [31 December 2021 address-based population registration system (ADNKS) result]. Available at: https://www.tuik.gov.tr/indir/duyuru/favori_raporlar.xlsx[In Turkish].
