Drawing upon in-depth interviews with 58 Korean-Chinese immigrants in South Korea, this study examines how ethnic return migrants negotiate their ethnic and national identities after relocating to the ancestral homeland. Findings reveal that migrants’ identity negotiations reflect the ethno-racial contexts of both pre- and post-migration societies. Most participants have one of three identity orientations: ethnic-identity (Korean), national-identity (Chinese), and in-between. Those who are oriented exclusively toward either Chinese or Korean identity struggle to claim full belonging in the society with which they primarily identify. Furthermore, having an in-between orientation does not provide flexible identity options but only results in a sense of being unable to belong anywhere. Findings suggest that the ethnic return migrants’ perceived minority status in both home and host societies play a crucial role in shaping their identity negotiations.
CheryanSMoninB (2005)
Where are you really from?: Asian Americans and identity denial. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology89(5): 717–730.
6.
ChristouA (2006)
Deciphering diaspora – translating transnationalism: Family dynamics, identity constructions and the legacy of ‘home’ in second-generation Greek-American return migration. Ethnic and Racial Studies29(6): 1040–1056.
7.
Cook-MartínDViladrichA (2009)
The problem with similarity: Ethnic-affinity migrants in Spain. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies35(1): 151–170.
8.
FangMH (2013)
Strategy of practice of belonging and identity for ethnic Koreans in Korea. Society and History98: 227–257.
9.
FoxJE (2007)
From national inclusion to economic exclusion: Ethnic Hungarian labour migration to Hungary. Nations and Nationalism13(1): 77–96.
10.
GansHJ (1979)
Symbolic ethnicity: The future of ethnic groups and cultures in America. Ethnic and Racial Studies2(1): 1–20.
11.
GordonMM (1964) Assimilation in American Life: The Role of Race, Religion, and National Origins.
New York:
Oxford University Press.
12.
HongYSongCParkJ (2013)
Korean, Chinese, or what? Identity transformations of Chosŏnjok (Korean Chinese) migrant brides in South Korea. Asian Ethnicity14(1): 29–51.
13.
JainS (2011)
The rights of ‘return’: Ethnic identities in the workplace among second-generation Indian-American professionals in the parental homeland. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies37(9): 1313–1330.
14.
KangJW (2012)
Diaspora and contemporary Yanbian Korean Chineseʼs imagined community: The social construction and reterritorialization of the ethnic community. Korean Journal of Sociology46(4): 96–136.
15.
KibriaN (2000)
Race, ethnic options, and ethnic binds: Identity negotiations of second-generation Chinese and Korean Americans. Sociological Perspectives43(1): 77–95.
16.
KibriaN (2002) Becoming Asian American: Second-generation Chinese and Korean American identities.
Baltimore, MD:
Johns Hopkins University Press.
17.
KimJ (2016) Contested Embrace: Transborder Membership Politics in Twentieth-Century Korea.
Stanford, CA:
Stanford University Press.
18.
Korea Immigration Service (2019) Korea Immigration Service Statistics 2018. Seoul: Korea Immigration Service, Ministry of Justice.
19.
KwonTH (2001)
The uncertain future of the Korean Chinese. Korean and Korean American Studies Bulletin12(1): C20–C41.
20.
LeeCWChoiS (2016)
Is there wage discrimination against Korean-Chinese migrants in the Korean labor market?: A comparison of wage determinants between Korean-Chinese migrants and native Koreans. The Journal of Asiatic Studies59(4): 178–220.
21.
LeeHK (2008) Hybridized Korean identities: The making of Korean-Americans and Joseonjok. In: Smith KEI and Leavy P (eds) Hybrid Identities. Leiden: Brill, pp.291–312.
22.
LeeJE (2012)
Social membership between ‘foreigner’ and ‘overseas Korean’: Differentiation of social status and perception of the Chinese-Korean Society in South Korea. Economy and Society96: 402–429.
23.
LeeJE (2018)
Recognition struggle of Chinese-Korean and reproduction of discrimination in South Korea. Journal of Diaspora Studies12(1): 145–173.
24.
LeeJ (2010) The policies on coethnics abroad in South Korea. MRTC Working Paper 2010–11.
Seoul:
IOM-Migration Research and Training Centre.
25.
LeeRMNohCYYooHC, et al. (2007)
The psychology of diaspora experiences: Intergroup contact, perceived discrimination, and the ethnic identity of Koreans in China. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology13(2): 115–124.
26.
MackerrasC (1998)
The impact of economic reform on China's minority nationalities. Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy3(1): 61–79.
27.
MinPG (1992)
A comparison of the Korean minorities in China and Japan. International Migration Review26(1): 4–21.
28.
NagelJ (1994)
Constructing ethnicity: Creating and recreating identity and culture. Social Problems41(1): 152–167.
29.
OlivierB (2001)
Ethnicity as a political instrument among the Koreans of Northeast China, pre-1945 to the present. Korean and Korean American Studies Bulletin12: C6–C19.
30.
OngADominguezVRFriedmanJ, et al. (1996)
Cultural citizenship as subject-making: Immigrants negotiate racial and cultural boundaries in the United States [and comments and reply].Current Anthropology37(5): 737–762.
31.
ParkKSLee CWJiangM (2019) Changes in the demographic structure of Korean-Chinese population and policy implications. MRTC Policy Report Series 2019-04. Seoul: Migration Research and Training Centre.
32.
PortesAZhouM (1993)
The new second generation: Segmented assimilation and its variants. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science530(1): 74–96.
33.
SandersJ (2002)
Ethnic boundaries and identity in plural societies. Annual Review of Sociology28(1): 327–357.
34.
SeolDHSeoJ (2014)
Dynamics of ethnic nationalism and hierarchical nationhood: Korean nation and its othernesss since the late 1980s. Korea Journal54(2): 5–33.
35.
SeolDHSkrentnyJD (2009)
Ethnic return migration and hierarchical nationhood Korean Chinese foreign workers in South Korea. Ethnicities9(2): 147–174.
36.
SnowDAAndersonL (1987)
Identity work among the homeless: The verbal construction and avowal of personal identities. American Journal of Sociology92(6): 1336–1371.
37.
TakenakaA (1999)
Transnational community and its ethnic consequences: The return migration and the transformation of ethnicity of Japanese Peruvians. American Behavioral Scientist42(9): 1459–1474.
38.
TeerlingJ (2011)
The development of new ‘third-cultural spaces of belonging’: British-born Cypriot ‘return’ migrants in Cyprus. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies37(7): 1079–1099.
39.
TsudaT (1999)
Transnational migration and the nationalization of ethnic identity among Japanese Brazilian return migrants. Ethos27(2): 145–179.
40.
TsudaT (2000)
Acting Brazilian in Japan: Ethnic resistance among return migrants. Ethnology39(1): 55–71.
41.
TsudaT (2003) Strangers in the Ethnic Homeland: Japanese Brazilian Return Migration in Transnational Perspective.
New York, NY:
Columbia University Press.
42.
TuanM (1998) Forever Foreigners or Honorary Whites?: The Asian Ethnic Experience Today.
New Brunswick, NJ:
Rutgers University Press.
43.
VarjonenSArnoldLJasinskaja-LahtiI (2013) ‘
We’re Finns here, and Russians there’: A longitudinal study on ethnic identity construction in the context of ethnic migration. Discourse and Society24(1): 110–134.
44.
WangLK (2016)
The Benefits of in-betweenness: Return migration of second-generation Chinese American professionals to China. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies42(12): 1941–1958.
45.
WatersMC (1994)
Ethnic and racial identities of second-generation black immigrants in New York City. The International Migration Review28(4): 795–820.
46.
WuFH (2002) Yellow: Race in America Beyond Black and White.
New York:
Basic Books.
47.
YamashiroJH (2011)
Racialized national identity construction in the ancestral homeland: Japanese American migrants in Japan. Ethnic and Racial Studies34(9): 1502–1521.
48.
YooM (2002)
Between ethnicity and nationality: On the identity of Chosunjok working in South Korea. Korean Cultural Anthropology35(1): 73–100.
49.
ZhouMLeeJ (2007)
Becoming ethnic or becoming American?Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race4(1): 189–205.
