Studies on migration often assume that members of the same ethnic category are less likely to develop exclusionary attitudes toward each other. In order to explain why many Hong Kong people exhibit exclusionary attitudes toward granting social rights to Chinese immigrants who share the same ethnic ancestry with them, we conducted a phone survey to examine four important factors: (1) economic threat; (2) social threat; (3) negative stereotypes; and (4) contact with immigrants. We find that the economic threat—either at the societal or individual level—perceived by respondents does not explain their exclusionary attitudes. The results are consistent with alternative explanations emphasizing cultural and non-economic concerns commonly associated with ethnocentrism.
BakerHDR (1993) Social change in Hong Kong: Hong Kong man in search of majority. The China Quarterly136(December): 864–877.
2.
BoboLHutchingsVL (1996) Perceptions of racial group competition: Extending Blumer’s theory of group position to a multiracial social context. American Sociological Review61(6): 951–972.
3.
BonacichE (1972) A theory of ethnic antagonism: The split labor market. American Sociological Review37(5): 547–559.
4.
Census and Statistical Department (CSD) (2012) Thematic Report: Persons from the Mainland Having Resided in Hong Kong for Less than 7 Years, Hong Kong: Hong Kong SAR Government.
5.
ChambonASBellamyDF (2015) Ethnic identity, intergroup relations and welfare policy in the Canadian context: A comparative discourse analysis. The Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare22(1): 121–147.
6.
ChanderCRTsaiY (2001) Social factorsinfluencing immigration attitudes: An analysis of data from the general social survey. Social Scienc e Journal38(2): 177–188.
7.
Choi F (2000) The image of comprehensive social security assistance clients in printed media in Hong Kong. Hong Kong Social and Cultural Quarterly. Available at: http://www.franklenchoi.org/monograph/cssa.htm [In Chinese].
8.
ChouKL (2013) Familial effect on child poverty in Hong Kong immigrant families. Social Indicators Research113(1): 183–195.
9.
ChunA (1996) Fuck Chineseness: On the ambiguities of ethnicity as culture as identity. Boundary 223(2): 111–138.
10.
CitrinJGreenDPMusteCWongC (1997) Public opinion toward immigration reform: The role of economic motivations. The Journal of Politics59(3): 858–881.
11.
DustmannCPrestonIP (2007) Racial and economic factors in attitudes to immigration. The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis and Policy7(1): Article 62.
12.
EspenshadeTJHempsteadK (1996) Contemporary American attitudes toward US immigration. International Migration Review30(2): 535–570.
13.
EssesVMDovidioJFJacksonLM (2001) The immigration dilemma: The role of perceived group competition, ethnic prejudice, and national identity. Journal of Social Issues57(3): 389–412.
14.
EssesVMJacksonLMArmstrongTL (1998) Intergroup competition and attitudes toward immigrants and immigration: An instrumental model of group conflict. Journal of Social Issues54(4): 699–724.
15.
FacchiniGMaydaAM (2009) Does the welfare state affect individual attitudes toward immigrants? Evidence across countries. Review of Economics and Statistics91(2): 295–314.
16.
FetzerJS (2000) Public Attitudes toward Immigration in the United States, France, and Germany, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17.
GoerresATepeM (2012) Doing it for the kids? The determinants of attitudes toward public childcare in unified Germany. Journal of Social Policy41(2): 349–372.
18.
GorodzeiksyA (2012) Mechanisms of exclusion: Attitudes toward allocation of social rights to out-group population. Ethnic and Racial Studies36(5): 795–817.
19.
GorodzeiskyASemyonovM (2009) Terms of exclusion: Public views toward admission and allocation of rights to immigrants in European countries. Ethnic and Racial Studies32(3): 401–423.
20.
GreenEGT (2009) Who can enter? A multilevel analysis on public support for immigration criteria across 20 European countires. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations12(1): 41–60.
21.
HainmuellerJHiscoxMJ (2007) Educated preferences: Explaining attitudes toward immigration in Europe. International Organization61(2): 399–442.
22.
HainmuellerJHiscoxMJ (2010) Attitudes toward highly skilled and low-skilled immigration: Evidence from a survey experiment. American Political Science Review104(1): 61–84.
23.
HamiltonDLShermanSJRuvoloCM (1990) Stereotype-based expectancies: Effects on information processing and social behavior. Journal of Social Issues46(2): 35–60.
24.
HernesGKnudsenK (1992) Norwegians attitudes toward new immigrants. Acta Sociologica35(2): 123–139.
25.
HKSAR Government (2003) Task Force on Population Policy, Hong Kong: HKSAR Government.
26.
KuAS (2004) Immigration policies, discourses, and the politics of local belonging in Hong Kong (1950–1980). Modern China30(3): 326–360.
27.
LaiPC (1997) An exploratory study on Chinese immigrant women in Hong Kong. In: ShekDTLLamMCAuCF (eds) Social Work in Hong Kong: Reflections and Challenges, Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press, pp. 143–164.
28.
LamKLiuP (1998) Immigration and the Economy of Hong Kong, Hong Kong: City University of Hong Kong Press.
29.
LewisG (2000) Discursive histories, the pursuit of multiculturalism and social policy. In: LewisGGewirtzSClarkeJ (eds) Rethinking Social Policy, London: Sage, pp. 259–275.
30.
McLarenLM (2003) Anti-immigrant prejudice in Europe: Contact, threat perception, and preferences for the exclusion of migrants. Social Forces81(3): 909–936.
31.
MewesJMauS (2013) Globalization, socio-economic status and welfare chauvinism: European perspectives on attitudes toward the exclusion of immigrants. International Journal of Comparative Sociology54(3): 228–245.
32.
NgFSILeeSYWongWKF (2015) Effects of perceived discrimination on the quality of life among new Mainland Chinese immigrants to Hong Kong: A longitudinal study. Social Indicators Research120(3): 817–834.
33.
PantojaA (2006) Against the tide? Core American values and attitudes toward US immigration policy in the mid-1990s. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies32(3): 515–531.
34.
PaoliniSHarwoodJRubinM (2010) Negative intergroup contact makes group memberships salient: Explaining why intergroup conflict endures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin36(12): 1723–1738.
35.
PehrsonSVignolesVLBrownR (2009) National identification and anti-immigrant prejudice: Individual and contextual effects of national definitions. Social Psychology Quarterly72(1): 24–38.
36.
PettigrewTF (1998) Intergroup contact theory. Annual Review of Psychology49: 65–85.
37.
PettigrewTFTroppLR (2006) A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology90(5): 751–783.
38.
PowersDAEllisonCG (1995) Interracial contact and black racial attitudes: The contact hypothesis and selectivity bias. Social Forces74(1): 205–226.
39.
RaijmanRSemyonovM (2004) Perceived threat and exclusionary attitudes toward foreign workers in Israel. Ethnic and Racial Studies27(5): 780–799.
40.
RaijmanRSemyonovMSchmidtP (2003) Do foreigners deserve rights? Determinants of public views toward foreigners in Germany and Israel. European Sociological Review19(4): 379–392.
41.
ReeskensTWrightM (2013) Nationalism and the cohesive society: A multilevel analysis of the interplay among diversity, national identity, and social capital across 27 European societies. Comparative Political Studies46(2): 153–181.
42.
SautmanB (2004) Hong Kong as a semi-ethnocracy: “Race”, migration and citizenship in a globalized region. In: KuASPunN (eds) Remaking Citizenship in Hong Kong Community, Nation and the Global City, New York: Routledge Curzon, pp. 115–138.
43.
SchlueterEWagnerU (2008) Regional differences matter: Examining the dual influence of the regional size of the immigrant population on derogation of immigrants in Europe. International Journal of Comparative Sociology49(2–3): 153–173.
44.
SchneiderSL (2008) Anti-immigrant attitudes in Europe: Outgroup size and perceived ethnic threat. European Sociological Review24(1): 53–67.
45.
SidesJCitrinJ (2007) European opinion about immigration: The role of identities, interests and information. British Journal of Political Science37(3): 477–504.
46.
SiuHF (2009) Positioning “Hong Kongers” and “new immigrants.”. In: SiuHFKuAS (eds) Hong Kong Mobile: Making a Global Population, Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press, pp. 149–199.
47.
SnidermanPMHagendoornLPriorM (2004) Predisposing factors and situational triggers: Exclusionary reactions to immigrant minorities. American Political Science Review98(1): 35–49.
48.
SoAY (2003) Cross-border families in Hong Kong: The role of social class and politics. Critical Asian Studies35(4): 515–534.
49.
StephanWG (2011) Improving relations between residents and immigrants. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy12(1): 33–48.
50.
StephanWYbarraOMartnezC (1999) Prejudice toward immigrants. Journal of Applied Social Psychology29(11): 2221–2237.
51.
TaylorD (1998) Social identity and social policy: Engagements with postmodern theory. Journal of Social Policy27(3): 329–350.
52.
Van HookJBeanFD (2009) Immigrant welfare receipt: Implications for immgirant settlement and integration. In: FixME (ed.) Immigrants and Welfare: The Impact of Welfare Reform on America’s Newcomers, New York: Russell Sage Foundation, pp. 93–122.
53.
WagnerUChristOPettigrewTF (2006) Prejudice and minority proportion: Contact instead of threat effects. Social Psychology Quarterly 69. 4. 380–390.
54.
WarrenTCTroyKK (2015) Explaining violent intra-ethnic conflict: Group fragmentation in the shadow of state power. Journal of Conflict Resolution59(3): 484–509.
55.
WongCLouV (2010) “I wish to be self-reliant”: Aspiration for self-reliance, need and life satisfaction, and exit dilemma of welfare recipients in Hong Kong. Social Indicators Research95(3): 519–534.
56.
WongTKWanPLawKW (2009) Welfare attitudes and social class: The case of Hong Kong in comparative perspective. International Journal of Social Welfare18(2): 142–152.
57.
WongTKWanPLawKW (2010) The public’s changing perceptions of the condition of social welfare in Hong Kong: Lessons for social development. Social Policy and Administration44(5): 620–640.
58.
YanowD (2003) Constructing “Race” and “Ethnicity” in America: Category-making in Public Policy and Administration, Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
