The household is usually the unit of analysis in the literature on migrant remittances, reflecting assumptions that remittances represent flows between family members and are pooled within households. By importing ideas from development studies and using the individual as the unit of analysis, this article challenges these assumptions and interrogates the household as a ‘black-box’ remittance-receiving entity. The study is based on a survey of remittance receivers in Pakistan, and a qualitative study of the Norway-Pakistan remittance corridor. The findings reveal that remittances in chain-migration often consist of transactions to targeted individuals within the household and to individuals beyond the household, exposing kinship, gender, and religious dimensions that are not as visible when the household is the unit of analysis.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BallardR.2003“A Case of Capital-rich Underdevelopment: The Paradoxical Consequences of Successful Transnational Entrepreneurship from Mirpur,”Contributions to Indian Sociology, 37(1–2):25–57.
2.
BenthallJ.1999“Financial Worship: The Quranic Injunction to Almsgiving,”Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 5(1):27–42.
3.
BolognaniM.2007“The Myth of Return: Dismissal, Survival or Revival? A Bradford Example of Transnationalism as a Political Instrument,”Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 33 (1):59–76.
4.
BowenJ. R.2004“Beyond Migration: Islam as a Transnational Public Space,”Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 30(5):879–894.
5.
CarlingJ.2008“The Determinants of Migrant Remittances,”Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 24 (3):582–599.
6.
CarlingJ.ErdalM.B.HorstC.2012“How Does Conflict in the Country of Origin Affect Remittance Sending? Financial Priorities and Transnational Obligations Among Somalis and Pakistanis in Norway,”International Migration Review, 46(2):283–309.
7.
ChantS.2005“Household Decisions, Gender and Development: A Synthesis of Recent Research,”American Anthropologist, 107(4):738–739.
8.
CharsleyK.ShawA.2006“South Asian Transnational Marriages in Comparative Perspective,”Global Networks-a Journal of Transnational Affairs, 6(4):331–344.
9.
DeanH.KhanZ.1997“Muslim Perspectives on Welfare,”Journal of Social Policy, 26:193–209.
10.
De HaasH.2010“Migration and Development: A Theoretical Perspective,”International Migration Review, 44(1):227–264.
11.
ErdalM. B.2011“‘A Place to Stay in Pakistan:’ Why Migrants Build Houses in their Country of Origin,”Population, Space and Place, 18(5):629–641.
12.
FapohundaE. R.1988“The Nonpooling Household.” In A Home Divided: Women and Income in the Third World. Edited by DwyerD.BruceJ., Stanford: Stanford University Press.
13.
FisherM.ReimerJ.CarrE.2010“Who Should Be Interviewed in Surveys of Household Income?,”World Development, 38 (7):966–973.
14.
GoldringL.2004“Family and Collective Remittances to Mexico: A Multi-dimensional Typology,”Development and Change, 35(4):799–840.
15.
GrilloR., ed. 2008The Family in Question: Immigrant and Ethnic Minorities in Multicultural Europe. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
16.
GroshM.GlewweP., eds. 2000Designing Household Survey Questionnaires for Developing Countries: Lessons Learned from 15 years of the Living Standards Measurement Study. Washington, DC: World Bank.
17.
GuarnizoL. E.2003“The Economics of Transnational Living,”International Migration Review, 37(3):666–699.
18.
Hagen-ZankerJ.SiegelM.2007“The Determinants of Remittances: A Review of the Literature.” Working Paper MGSoG/2007/WP003. Maastricht Graduate School of Governance, Maastricht University, The Netherland.
19.
HasanA.2010“Migration, Small Towns and Social Transformations in Pakistan,”Environment and Urbanization, 22(1):33–50.
20.
KalraV. S., ed. 2009Pakistani Diasporas: Culture, Conflict and Change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
21.
KandiyotiD.1999“Poverty in Transition: An Ethnographic Critique of Household Surveys in Post-Soviet Central Asia,”Development and Change, 30:499–524.
22.
KingR.VullnetariJ.2009“The Intersections of Gender and Generation in Albanian Migration, Remittances and Transnational Care,”Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 91(1):19–38.
23.
KochuytT.2009“God, Gifts and Poor People: On Charity in Islam,”Social Compass, 56(1):98–116.
24.
KunzR.2008“‘Remittances are Beautiful?’ Gender Implications of the New Global Remittances Trend,”Third World Quarterly, 29(7):1389–1409.
25.
LevittP.2007God Needs No Passport: Immigrants and the Changing American Religious Landscape. New York: The New Press.
26.
LevittP.DeWindJ.VertovecS.2003“International Perspectives on Transnational Migration: An Introduction,”International Migration Review, 37(3):565–575.
27.
LevittP.SchillerN. G.2004“Conceptualizing Simultaneity: A Transnational Social Field Perspective on Society,”International Migration Review, 38(145):595–629.
28.
LucasR. E. B.StarkO.1985“Motivations to Remit: Evidence from Botswana,”Journal of Political Economy, 95 (51):901–918.
29.
MahlerS. J.PessarP., 2001“Gendered Geographies of Power: Gender Across Transnational Spaces,”Identities, 7 (4):441–459.
30.
MasonJ.2004“Managing Kinship over Long Distances: The Significance of ‘The Visit’,”Social Policy and Society, 3(4):421–429.
31.
MazzucatoV.KabkiM.SmithL.2006“Transnational Migration and the Economy of Funerals: Changing Practices in Ghana,”Development and Change, 37(5):1047–1072.
32.
PortesA.2001“Introduction: The Debates and Significance of Immigrant Transnationalism,”Global Networks, 1(3):181–193.
33.
QuisumbingA., ed. 2003Household Decisions, Gender, and Development. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute/The John Hopkins University Press.
34.
ShawA.2000Kinship and Continuity: Pakistani Families in Britain. London: Routledge.
35.
ShawA.CharsleyK.2006“Rishtas: Adding Emotion to Strategy in Understanding British Pakistani Transnational Marriages,”Global Networks-a Journal of Transnational Affairs, 6(4):405–421.
36.
SnelE.EngbersenG.LeerkesA.2006“Transnational Involvement and Social Integration,”Global Networks, 6(3):285–308.
37.
Van HearN.2002“Sustaining Societies under Strain: Remittances as a Form of Transnational Exchange in Sri Lanka and Ghana.” In New Approaches to Migration? Transnational Communities and the Transformations of Home. Edited by. KoserK.Al-AliN., London: Routledge.
WerbnerP.2004“Theorising Complex Diasporas: Purity and Hybridity in the South Asian Public Sphere in Britain,”Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 30(5):895–911.
40.
WongM.2006“The Gendered Politics of Remittances in Ghanaian Transnational Families,”Economic Geography, 82(4):355–381.
41.
WuthnowR.OffutS.2008“Transnational Religious Connections,”Sociology of Religion, 69(2):209–232.
42.
ZontiniE.2004“Immigrant Women in Barcelona: Coping with the Consequences of Transnational Lives,”Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 30(6):113–144.
