Understanding the dynamics of contraceptive use among women migrants is considered important, especially to a country like Thailand that is undergoing many changes, and an increasingly female-dominated migration during the last few decades. Using survey data collected in 2000, this study seeks to examine the determinants of modern contraceptive use among women migrants in Nang Rong, Thailand. The study found that several demographic and socioeconomic factors are significant predictors of contraceptive use among women migrants and the magnitude of such effects varies across different migrant types.
BauerT.ZimmermannK.1997“Network Migration of Ethnic Germans,”International Migration Review, 31(1):143–149.
3.
BertrandJ. T.MagnaniR.KnowlesJ.1996Evaluating Family Planning Programs, with Adaptations for Reproductive Health. Chapel Hill, North Carolina:EVALUATION Project.
4.
BilsborrowR. E.GuilkeyD. K.1987“Community and Institutional Influence on Fertility: Analytical Issues,” Working Paper No. 157, Population and Labour Policies Programme, International Labour Organization, Geneva.
5.
BoydM.1989“Family and Personal Networks in International Migration: Recent Developments and New Agendas,”International Migration Review, 23(3):638–670.
6.
CarlsonE.1985“The Impact of International Migration Upon the Timing of Marriage and Childbearing,”Demography, 22(1):61–72.
7.
CarringtonP.1988“Network as Personal Communities.” In Social Structure: A Network Approach. Edited by WellmanBarryBerkowitzS.D., New York: Cambridge University Press.
8.
ChalamwongYongyuth1998“The Impact of the Crisis on Migration in Thailand,”Asian and Pacific Migration Journal, 7(2–3):297–312.
9.
ChamratrithirongA.1997National Contraceptive Prevalence Survey 1996. Nakhon Pathom: Institute for Population and Social Research, Mahidol University.
10.
ClelandJ. G.WilsonC.1987“Demand Theories of the Fertility Transition: An Iconoclastic View,”Population Studies, 4(1):5–30.
11.
ClementsS.2004“Explaining Areal Variation in Contraceptive Use in East Africa.” Working Paper No. A04–01, S3RI Applications and Policy, Division of Statistics, University of Southamptom, United Kingdom. Available at http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/8153/01/s3ri-workingpaper-a04–01.pdf, accessed on 18 December 2005.
12.
CurranS.1996“Intra-household Exchanges Relations: Explanations for Gender Differentials in Education and Migration Outcomes in Thailand.” Working Paper No. 96-12, Seattle Population Research Center, University of Washington.
13.
CurranS.2003“Migration, Cumulative Causation and Gender: Evidence from Thailand.” Paper presented at the Conference on African Migration and Urbanization in Comparative Perspective, Johannesburg, South Africa, 4–7 June.
14.
De JongG. F.2000“Expectations, Gender and Norms in Migration Decision-Making,”Population Studies, 54(3):307–319.
15.
De JongG. F.RichterK.IsarabhakdiP.1996“Gender, Values and Intentions to Move in Rural Thailand,”International Migration Review, 30(3):748–770.
16.
DevS.M.EvensonR. E.2003“Rural Development in India: Rural, Non-Farm and Migration.” Available at http://scid.stanford.edu/pdf/credpr187.pdf, accessed on 18 December 2005.
17.
EntwisleB.1996“Community and Contraceptive Choice in Rural Thailand: A Case Study of Nang Rong”Demography, 33(1):1–11.
18.
FordK.1990“Duration of Residence in the United States and the Fertility of US Immigrants,”International Migration Review, 24 ():34–68.
19.
GodleyJ.2001“Kinship Networks and Contraceptive Choice in Nang Rong, Thailand,”International Family Planning Perspectives, 27(1). Available at http://www.agi-usa.org/pubs/journals/2700401.pdf, accessed on 18 December 2005.
20.
GoldsteinS.1973“Interrelations between Migration and Fertility in Thailand,”Demography, 10(2): 225–41.
21.
GoldsteinA.WhiteM.GoldsteinS.1997“Migration, Fertility and State Policy in Hubei Province, China,”Demography, 34(4): 93–103.
22.
GranovetterM.1995Getting a Job: A Study of Contacts and Careers. 2nd edition. Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
23.
GranovetterM.1973“The Strength of Weak Ties,”American Journal of Sociology, 78(6):1360–1380.
24.
GuestP.1999“Mobility Transition within a Global System: Migration in the ESCAP Region,”AsiaPacific Population Journal, 14(4):57–72.
25.
GuestP.1996“Assessing the Consequences of Internal Migration: Methodological Issues and a Case Study on Thailand Based on Longitudinal Household Survey Data.” In Migration, Urbanization, and Development: New Directions and Issues. Edited by BilsborrowR. E., New York: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
26.
GuestP.1994“Internal Migration in Thailand,”Asian and Pacific Migration Journal, 3(4):531–545.
27.
HervitzH.1985“Selectivity, Adaptation or Disruption? A Comparison of Alternative Hypotheses on the Effects of Migration on Fertility: The Case of Brazil,”International Migration Review, 19(2):293–317.
28.
HidayV. A.1978“Migration, Urbanization, and Fertility in the Philippines,”International Migration Review, 12(3):370–385.
29.
HirschmanC.GuestP.1990“Multilevel Models of Fertility Determination in Four Southeast Asian Countries: 1970 and 1980,”Demography, 27(3):369–396.
30.
HirschmanC.1994“The Path to Below Replacement-level Fertility in Thailand,”International Family Planning Perspectives, 20:82–87.
31.
JensenE. R.AhlburgD. A.1999“The Impact of Migration on Fertility in the Philippines.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of Population Association of America, New York, 25–27 March 1999.
32.
KhanJ.1988“Immigration Selectivity and Fertility Adaptation in the United States,”Social Forces, 67(1): 108–128.
33.
KnodelJ.ChamratrithirongA.DebavalyaN.1987Thailand's Reproductive Revolution: Rapid Fertility Decline in a Third World Setting. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
34.
KnodelJ.DebavalyaN.KamnuansilpaN.1980“Thailand's Continuing Reproductive Revolution,”International Family Planning Perspectives, 6(3):84–97.
35.
KnodelJ.NapapornC.FrisenC.1988“Has Thailand's Fertility Decline Stalled,”Asia Pacific Population Journal, 3(3):3–20.
36.
KnodelJ.1996“Reproductive Preferences and Fertility Trends in Post-transition Thailand,”Studies in Family Planning, 27(6): 307–318.
37.
LandaleN.HauanS.1996“Migration and Premarital Childbearing among Puerto Rican Women,”Demography, 33(4): 429–442.
38.
LeeB. S.FarberS. C.1984“Fertility Adaptation by Rural-Urban Migrants in Developing Countries: The Case of Korea,”Population Studies, 38(1):141–155.
39.
LeeB. S.PolL. G.1993“The Influence of Rural-Urban Migration on Migrants' Fertility in Korea, Mexico and Cameroon,”Population Research and Policy Review, 12(1):3–26.
40.
LimanondaB.1995“Families in Thailand: Beliefs and Realities,”Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 26(l):67–82.
41.
LucasR.1998“Internal Migration and Urbanization: Recent Contributions and New Evidence.” Available at http://www.bu.edu/econ/ied/dp/91.htm, accessed on 18 December 2005.
42.
LucasR.1997“Internal Migration in Developing Countries.” In Handbook of Population and Family Economics. Edited by RosenzweigMark R.StarkOded. New York: Elsevier Science.
43.
MasseyD.1990“Social Structure, Household Strategies, and the Cumulative Causation of Migration,”Population Index, 56(1):3–26.
44.
MasseyD.1993“Theories of International Migration: A Review and Appraisal,”Population and Development Review, 19(3):431–466.
45.
MinhNguyen Huu1996“Age at First Marriage in Vietnam: Patterns and Determinants.” Working Paper No. 96-1, Seattle Population Research Center, University of Washington.
46.
National Economic and Social Development Board (NESDB)1995Population Projections for Thailand, 1995–2020. Bangkok: NESDB.
47.
OsakiKeiko2003“Migrant Remittances in Thailand: Economic Necessity of Social Norm?”Journal of Population Research, 20(2):203–222.
48.
OsakiKeiko1999“Economic Interactions of Migrants and Their Households of Origin: Are Women More Reliable Supporters?”Asian and Pacific Migration Journal, 8(4):447–471.
49.
PhongpaichitP.1991“The Labor Market Aspects of Female Migration in Thailand.” Paper presented at the United Nations Expert Group Meeting on the Feminization of Internal Migration, Aguascalientes, Mexico, 22–25 October.
50.
RosenzweigM.R.StarkO.1989“Consumption Smoothing, Migration, and Marriage—Evidence From Rural India,”Journal of Political Economy, 97(4):905–926.
51.
SchoorlJ. J.1990“Fertility Adaptation of Turkish and Moroccan Women,”International Migration Review, 28(4):477–495.
52.
SilveyR.ElmhirstR.2003“Engendering Social Capital: Women Workers and Rural-Urban Networks in Indonesia's Crisis,”World Development, 31(5):865–879.
53.
SingleyS. G.LandaleNancy1998“Incorporating Origin and Process in Migration-Fertility Frameworks: The Case of Puerto Rican Women,”Social Forces, 76(4):1437–1470.
54.
SmithH. L.1989“Integrating Theory and Research on the Institutional Determinants of Fertility,”Demography, 26(2):171–184.
55.
StephenE. H.BeanF. D.1992“Assimilation, Disruption and the Fertility of Mexican-Origin Women in the United States,”International Migration Review, 26(1):67–88.
56.
United Nations Secretariat1991“Types of Female Migration.” In Internal Migration of Women in Developing Countries. New York:United Nations.
57.
VanweyL. K.2003“Land Ownership as a Determinant of Temporary Migration in Nang Rong, Thailand,”European Journal of Population, 19(2):121–145.
58.
WhiteM.MorenoL.GuoS.1995“The Interrelationship of Fertility and Geographic Mobility in Peru: A Hazard Model Analysis,”International Migration Review, 19(3):492–515.
59.
YangX.2000“The Fertility Impact of Temporary Migration in China: A Detachment Hypothesis,”European Journal of Population, 16(2):163–183.
Yoddumnern-AttigB.1992“Thai Family Structure and Organization: Changing Roles and Duties in Historical Perspective.” In Changing Roles and Statuses of Women in Thailand: A Documentary Assessment. Edited by Yoddumnern-AttigB., Bangkok, Thailand: Institute for Population and Social Research.
