The political space given to non-governmental organizations to respond to the economic and legal problems experienced by migrant workers is heavily restricted in Malaysia and Singapore. The relative political weakness of their respective civil societies has been the focus of some research, albeit to a lesser extent with specific reference to their labor sectors, raising questions on what this implies for migrant labor activism.
By exploring the differences and similarities across the various organizations involved in migrant worker issues in-country as well as across countries, this paper investigates the role of state authoritarianism in shaping the landscape of migrant labor activism in Malaysia and Singapore. It assesses the pressure non-union civil society organizations can bring to bear on both the state-sponsored and traditional labor movement organizations which have been co-opted by the state to a greater or lesser extent in both Malaysia and Singapore. It is argued that it is in fact migrant labor and the growing political activism, especially transnational activism, which contributes or may contribute to the reinvigoration of labor activism in general by highlighting the many-folded problems of foreign workers.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
CrinisV.2002“The Stratification of the Garment and Textile Industries and Labor Movements in Malaysia.” In Women and Work in Globalising Asia. Edited by GillsD.S.PiperN., London: Routledge.
2.
DeyoF.1997“Labor and Post-fordist Industrial Restructuring in East and Southeast Asia,”Work & Occupations, 24(1):19–41.
3.
FordM.2006“After Nunukan: The Regulation of Indonesian Migration to Malaysia.” In Divided We Move: Mobility, Labor Migration and Border Controls in Asia. Edited by KaurA.MetcalfeI., New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
4.
FordM.2004“Organizing the Unorganizable: Unions, NGOs and Indonesian Migrant Labour,”International Migration, 42(5):99–119.
5.
FordM.2002‘The Place of NGOs in the Organized Labor Movements of Indonesia and Malaysia.’ Unpublished paper presented at the 2002 Annual Meeting of the Association of Asian Studies, Washington, DC, 4–7 April.
6.
FordM.PiperN. forthcoming ‘The Construction of Informal Regimes as Sites of Female Agency: Foreign Domestic Worker-Related Activism in East and Southeast Asia.’ In Everyday Politics of the World Economy. Edited by DobsonJohnSeabrookeLenard. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
7.
FrostStephenChiuCatherine C.H.2003‘Labor Relations and Regbulation in Singapore: Theory and Practice.’ Working Papers Series no. 55, Southeast Asia Research Centre, City University of Hong Kong.
8.
GallinD.2000‘Trade Unions and NGOs: A Necessary Partnership for Social Development.’ Civil Society and Social Movements Programme Paper Number 1, United Nations Research Institute for Social Development, Geneva.
9.
Human Rights Watch2006Maid to Order — Ending Abuses Against Migrant Domestic Workers in Singapore. New York: Human Rights Watch.
10.
Human Rights Watch2004Help Wanted — Abuses against Female Migrant Domestic Workers in Indonesia and Malaysia. New York: Human Rights Watch.
11.
HutchisonJaneBrownAndrew, eds. 2001Organising Labour in Globalising Asia. London: Routledge.
12.
International Confederation of Free Trade Unions-Asian and Pacific Regional Organisation (ICFTU-APRO)2003Migration Issues Concern Trade Unions. Singapore: ICFTU-APRO.
13.
International Labour Organization (ILO)2004Towards a Fair Deal for Migrant Workers in the Global Economy. Geneva: ILO.
JohanssonRenato2005“Role of TU in Respect to Migrant Workers: Summary of Responses.” Unpublished background paper, International Labour Organization, Geneva.
16.
LyonsLenore2005“Transient Workers Count Too? The Intersection of Citizenship and Gender in Singapore's Civil Society,”Sojourn, 20(2):208–248.
17.
LyonsLenore2004“Organizing for Domestic Worker Rights in Southeast Asia: Feminist Responses to Globalisation.” Paper presented at the 15th Biennial Conference of the Asian Studies Association of Australia, Canberra, 29 June-2 July.
18.
Malaysian Employers Federation2005‘The Employer's Perspective: Migrant Workers and Malaysia's Labor Needs.’ Paper presented at the UNHCR Roundtable on Migration and Refugee Issues, Kuala Lumpur, 13–14 July.
19.
Malaysian Trade Union Council (MTUC)2005“Domestic Workers,”Labor Bulletin, 30 July, p. 5.
NarayananS.2005“Migrant Labor and the Malaysian Economy.” Paper presented at the UNHCR Roundtable on Migration and Refugee Issues, Kuala Lumpur, 13–14 July.
22.
NavamukundanA. n.d. “Labor Migration in Malaysia,”Trade Union Views, 115–119.
23.
PeetzDavidToddTrish2000Globalization and Industrial Relations in Malaysia. Bangkok: ILO Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific.
24.
PiperNicola2005a“Rights of Foreign Domestic Workers — Emergence of Transnational and Transregional Solidarity?,”Asian and Pacific Migration Journal, 14(1–2):97–120.
25.
PiperNicola2005b“Transnational Politics and Organizing of Migrant Labor in South-East Asia — NGO and Trade Union Perspectives,”Asia-Pacific Population Journal, 20(3):87–110.
26.
PiperNicolaIredaleRobyn2003Identification of the Obstacles to the Signing and Ratification of the UN Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers: The Asia Pacific Perspective. Asia Pacific Migration Research Network (APMRN) Working Paper 14. Wollongong: University of Wollongong.
27.
PiperNicolaUhlinAnders, eds. 2004Transnational Activism in Asia. London: Routledge.
28.
PiperNicolaUhlinAnders, eds. 2002“Transnational Advocacy Networks and the Issue of Trafficking and Labour Migration in East and Southeast Asia. A Gendered Analysis of Opportunities and Obstacles,”Asian and Pacific Migration Journal, 11(2):171–195.
29.
PrompiamJunya1996“Thai Male Migration Workers in Singapore,”Journal of Social Research CUSRI. Available at http://www.thailabor.org/docs/singapore.html, accessed on 23 June 2005.
30.
RahmanMizanurFeeLian Kwen2005“Bangladeshi Migrant Workers in Singapore: The View from Inside,”Asia-Pacific Population Journal, 20(1):63–87.
31.
RamasamyP.2005“International Migration and Conflict: Foreign Labor in Malaysia.” In International Migration in Southeast Asia. Edited by AnantaA.ArifinE. N., Singapore: ISEAS.
32.
SingMing2002“Civil Society in Southeast Asia: Cases of Singapore and Malaysia.” In Development in Southeast Asia. Edited by ChanR.K.H.LeungK.K.NganR.M.H., Aldershot: Ashgate.
33.
Singapore National Trade Union Congress (SNTUC)2005“Background Paper on Migrant Workers in Singapore.” 15 June, SNTUC, Singapore.
34.
Suaram2003Malaysia: Human Rights Report 2003. Selangor: Suaram.
35.
Suaram1998“The Non-State Sector: Rise of Human Rights Activism,”Human Rights Watch, 15(2C), March.
Verité2005“Protecting Overseas Workers — Research Findings and Strategic Perspectives on Labor Protections for Foreign Contract Workers in Asia and the Middle East,” Research paper, Verité, Amherst, MA.
38.
WeeVivienneSimAmy2005“Hong Kong as a Destination for Migrant Domestic Workers.” In Asian Women as Transnational Domestic Workers. Edited by HuangShirlenaSingapore: Marshall Cavendish International.
39.
WeissMeredith2004“Transnational Activism by Malaysians: Foci, Tradeoffs and Implications.” In Transnational Activism in Asia. Edited by PiperN.UhlinA., London:Routledge.
40.
WisnuwardaniS.2005Problems Faced by Indonesian Migrant Domestic Workers in Singapore: Data and Facts. Jakarta: FOKER and Institute for Ecosoc Rights.
41.
Women's Aid Organisation (WAO)2003“Protection of Foreign Domestic Workers in Malaysia: Laws and Policies, Implication and Intervention.” Paper prepared for Programme Consultative Meeting on the Protection of Domestic Workers Against the Threat of Forced Labor and Trafficking, Hong Kong SAR, 16–10 February.
42.
YamanakaKeikoPiperNicola2006“Feminised Migration in East and Southeast Asia: Policies, Actions and Empowerment.” Occasional Paper No. 11, United Nations Research Institute for Social Development, Geneva.
YeohBrenda S.A.HuangShirlenaDevasahayamTheresa W.2004“Diasporic Subjects in the Nation: Foreign Domestic Workers, the Reach of Law and Civil Society in Singapore,”Asian Studies Review, 28:7–23.
