Over the last two decades, the needs and interests of temporary international labor migrants in Southeast Asia have overwhelmingly been the concern of non-governmental organizations (NGOs) rather than trade unions. However, in recent years unions have increasingly been forced to acknowledge that migrant workers are a potentially important trade union constituency. This introduction provides the theoretical framework for a collection of articles which grew out of a project involving academics, trade unionists and migrant labor NGO activists on the extent of union-NGO cooperation on migrant worker issues. It argues that while unions are now much more engaged with both with temporary migrant workers and the NGOs who advocate on their behalf, unions' approaches towards transnationalism and citizenship (and the concomitant issue of legality) — along with entrenched inter-sectoral divisions and prejudices — continue to limit their preparedness and ability to engage fully with issues concerning temporary labor migration.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Asian Migrant Centre and Migrant Forum in Asia (AMC/MFA)2001Asian Migrant Yearbook 2001: Migration Facts, Analysis and Issues in 2000. Hong Kong: Asian Migrant Centre/Migrant Forum in Asia.
2.
AvciG.McDonaldC.2000“Chipping Away at the Fortress: Unions, Immigration and the Transnational Labour Market,”International Migration, 38(2):191–207.
3.
BhattacherjeeD.2002“Organized Labour and Economic Liberalization in India: Past, Present and Future.” In Organized Labour in the 21st Century. Edited by JoseA.V., Geneva: International Institute for Labour Studies.
4.
BinghayV.2004“The Decline of Trade Unions and the Emerging Actors in Industrial Relations.” Paper presented at the 5th Asian Regional Conference of the International Industrial Relations Association, Seoul, 23–26 June. Available at http://www.kli.re.kr/iira2004/pro/papers/VirgelC.Binghay.pdf, accessed on 30 May 2006.
5.
CompaL.2000“NGO-Trade Union Tensions on the Ground,”Human Rights Dialogue, 2(4):12–15.
6.
European Trade Union Confederation (ETUC)2005Out of the Shadows: Organising and Protecting Domestic Workers in Europe: The Role of Trade Unions. Brussels: ETUC.
7.
FitzgeraldD.2004“Beyond Transnationalism: Mexican Hometown Politics at an American Labour Union,”Ethnic and Racial Studies, 27(2):228–247.
8.
FordM.2006“After Nunukan: The Regulation of Indonesian Migration to Malaysia.” In Mobility, Labour Migration and Border Controls in Asia. Edited by KaurA.MetcalfeI., New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
9.
FordM.2004“Organizing the Unorganizable: Unions, NGOs and Indonesian Migrant Labour,”International Migration, 42(5):99–119.
10.
FordM.2003“Substitute Trade Union or Novel Form of Labour Movement Organisation? Understanding Indonesia's Labour NGOs,”The Economic and Labour Relations Review, 14(1): 90–103.
11.
FordM.2002“The Place of NGOs in the Organized Labor Movements of Indonesia and Malaysia.” Paper presented at the Association for Asian Studies Annual Meeting, Washington, DC, 4–7 March.
12.
FordM.PiperN. forthcoming “The Construction of Informal Regimes as Southern Sites of Female Agency: Female Migrant Labour Activism in East and Southeast Asia.” In Everyday International Political Economy: Non-Elite Agency in the Transformations of the World Economy. Edited by HobsonJ.SeabrookL., Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
13.
GallinD.2001“Propositions on Trade Unions and Informal Employment in Times of Globalisation,”Antipode, 33(3):531–549.
14.
GallinD.2000“Trade Unions and NGOs: A Necessary Partnership for Social Development.” Civil Society and Social Movements Programme Paper Number 1, United Nations Research Institute for Social Development, Geneva.
15.
HausL.1995“Openings in the Wall: Transnational Migrants, Labor Unions, and U.S. Immigration Policy,”International Organization, 49(2):285–313.
16.
HealeyL.2000“Gender, ‘Aliens,’ and the National Imaginary in Contemporary Malaysia,”Sojourn, 15 (2):222–254.
17.
HerodA.2001“Labor Internationalism and the Contradictions of Globalization: Or, Why the Local Is Sometimes Still Important in a Global Economy,”Antipode, 33(3):407–426.
18.
LovebandA.2003“Positioning the Product: Indonesian Migrant Women Workers in Contemporary Taiwan.” SEARC/CAPSTRANS Working Paper No.43, SEARC, Hong Kong.
19.
Malaysian Trade Union Congress (MTUC)2005“Concluding Resolution of the MTUC Conference on Migrant Workers, April 18–19, 2005, Petaling Jaya, Malaysia,”http://www.gurn.info/topic/migrant/mtuc_conf_apr05.pdf, accessed on 30 April 2006.
20.
NissenB.GrenierG.2001“Union Responses to Mass Immigration: The Case of Miami, USA,”Antipode, 33(3): 567–592.
21.
PiperN.2003“Bridging Gender, Migration and Governance: Theoretical Possibilities in the Asian Context,”Asian and Pacific Migration Journal, 12(1–2):21–48.
22.
TeicherJ.2002“Australian Immigration: The Triumph of Economics over Prejudice?,”International Journal of Manpower, 23(3):209–236.
23.
WeeV.SimA.2005“Hong Kong as a Destination for Migrant Domestic Workers.” In Asian Women as Transnational Domestic Workers. Edited by HuangShirlenaYeohB.S.A.RahmanN. Abdul. Singapore: Marshall Cavendish International.
24.
WickramasekeraP.2002“Asian Labour Migration: Issues and Challenges in an Era of Globalisation.” International Migration Paper No.57, International Migration Programme, International Labour Office, Geneva.
25.
YeohB.HuangS.DevasahayamT.2004“Diasporic Subjects in the Nation: Foreign Domestic Workers, the Reach of the Law and Civil Society in Singapore,”Asian Studies Review, 28(1):7–23.
