Utilizing the 1990 Population and Housing Census of Taiwan, this paper attempted to examine return and onward labor migration and to identify their determinants by applying a three-level nested logit model. The study found that urban-to-rural movements mainly characterize return migration while onward migration is mostly inter-urban movements. Returnees in general tend to be less “successful” than their onward counterparts in the labor market. Other than the experience of “disappointment” in the market, location-specific capital left behind exerts a strong positive effect on return migration. Onward migrants are rather sensitive to market forces and spatial disparities in economic opportunities. In order to improve the efficiency of relocating human resources, the corresponding policy should focus more on measures that help “open up” market information for the labor force.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BarclayG. W.1954Colonial Development and Population in Taiwan. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
2.
Ben-AkivaM.LermanS. R.1985Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
3.
ChenC. H.1980Industrialization of Taiwan During the Japanese Administration. Taipei: Lieng-ching Publishing Ltd. (in traditional Chinese).
4.
ChenS. H.1979Population and Societal Transitions in Taiwan. Taipei: Lieng-ching Publishing Ltd. (in traditional Chinese).
5.
ClarkW. A. V.OnakaJ. L.1985“An Empirical Test of a Joint Model of Residential Mobility and Housing Choice,”Environment and Planning A, 17:915–930.
6.
DaVanzoJ. S.1983“Repeat Migration in the United States: Who Moves Back and Who Moves On?”Review of Economics and Statistics, 65(4):552–559.
7.
DaVanzoJ. S.1981“Repeat Migration, Information Costs, and Location-Specific Capital,”Population and Environment, 4(1):45–73.
8.
GrantE. K.VanderkampJ.1986“Repeat Migration and Disappointment,”Canadian Journal of Regional Science, 9:299–322.
9.
KauJ. B.SirmansC. F.1979“A Recursive Model of the Spatial Allocation of Migrants,”Journal of Regional Science, 19(1):47–56.
10.
KanaroglouP.LiawK. L.PapageorgiouY. Y.1986“An Analysis of Migratory System: Operational Framework,”Environment and Planning A, 18:1039–1060.
11.
KeaneM. P.WolpinK. I.1994“The Solution and Estimation of Discrete Choice Dynamic Programming Models by Simulation and Interpolation: Monte Carlo Evidence,”The Review of Economics and Statistics, 76(4):648–672.
12.
LiawK. L.1990“Joint Effects of Personal Factors and Ecological Variables on the Interprovincial Migration Pattern of Young Adults in Canada,”Geographical Analysis, 22:189–208.
13.
LinJ. P.1998“Labor Migration in Taiwan.” Unpublished doctoral dissertation, School of Geography and Geology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
14.
LinJ. P.LiawK. L.1999“Return and Onward Migrations of the Young Labor Force in Taiwan: Evidence from the Data of the 1990 Census,”Journal of Population Studies, 20:63–92.
15.
LinJ. P.LiawK. L.TsayC. L.1999“Determinants of Fast Repeat Migrations of the Labour Force: Evidence from the Linked National Survey Data of Taiwan,”Environment and Planning A, 31(5):925–945.
16.
LongL.1988Migration and Residential Mobility in the United States. New York: Russel Sage Foundation.
17.
McCullaghP.1983“Quasi-likelihood Functions,”The Annals of Statistics, 11:59–67.
18.
McFaddenD.1974“Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualitative Choice Behavior.” In Frontiers in Econometrics. Edited by ZarembkaPaul. New York: Academic Press.
19.
MillerA. R.1977“Interstate Migrants in the United States: Some Social-economic Differences by Type of Move,”Demography, 14(1):1–17.
20.
MorrisonP. A.1971“Chronic Movers and the Future Redistribution of Population: A Longitudinal Analysis,”Demography, 8(2):171–184.
21.
MorrisonP. A.DaVanzoJ. S.1986“The Prism of Migration: Dissimilarities between Return and Onward Movers,”Social Science Quarterly, 67(3):504–516.
22.
NewboldK. B.LiawK. L.1995“Return and Onward Migration in Canada, 1976–81: An Explanation by Personal and Ecological Attributes,”The Canadian Geographer, 39(1):16–30.
23.
NewboldK. B.LiawK. L.1994“Return and Onward Interprovincial Migration through Economic Boom and Bust in Canada, from 1976–81 to 1981–86,”Geographical Analysis, 26(3):228–245.
24.
NewboldK. B.LiawK. L.1990“Characterization of Primary, Return, and Onward Inter provincial Migration in Canada: Overall and Age-specific Patterns,”Canadian Journal of Regional Science, 13(1): 17–34.
25.
SelyaR. M.1974The Industrialization of Taiwan: Some Geographic Considerations. Jerusalem, Israel: The Jerusalem Academic Press.
26.
SjaastadL. A.1962“The Costs and Returns of Human Migration,”Journal of Political Economy: Supplement, 70:80–93.
27.
SpeareA.Jr.LiuP. K. C.TsayC.L.1988Urbanization and Development: The Rural-urban Transition in Taiwan. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press Inc.
28.
SternS.1994“Two Dynamic Discrete Choice Estimation Problems and Simulation Method Solutions,”The Review of Economics and Statistics, 76(4):695–702.
29.
TsayC. L.1993“Industrial Restructuring and International Competition in Taiwan,”Environment and Planning, 25(1):111–120.
30.
TsayC. L.1987“Status of Women in Taiwan: Educational Attainment and Labour Force Development, 1951–83,”Academia Economic Papers, 15(1):153–181.
31.
Van SoestA.1995“Structural Models of Family Labor Supply: A Discrete Choice Approach,”The Journal of Human Resources, 30(1):63–88.
32.
YezerA. M. J.ThurstonL.1976“Migration Patterns and Income Change: Implications for the Human Capital Approach to Migration,”Southern Economic Journal, 42:693–702.
