Femoral Catheters Increase Risk of Infection in Total Parenteral Nutrition Patients

Abstract

Central venous access for the administration of total parenteral nutrition is usually achieved via the subclavian or internal jugular veins. Although a high incidence of complications has been reported with the use of femoral catheters for central venous access, this route has been used when traditional central venous access is contraindicated. We retrospectively reviewed 171 patients who received total parenteral nutrition via a central venous triple-lumen catheter and compared the rates of infections in femoral vs nonfemoral access. A literature review was performed to identify associated complications of and appropriate indications for femoral catheter use. In the 171 patients studied, 355 triple-lumen catheters were placed; these included 331 nonfemoral catheters and 24 femoral catheters. Femoral catheters were placed in nine patients. Femoral catheters had a greater incidence of positive tips (42% vs 6.9%, p < .001) and related bacteremia (16.7% vs 1.8%, p = .002) than did nonfemoral catheters. The organisms most commonly isolated from the blood and catheter tips of both catheter access sites were methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis and Candida. The use of femoral catheters for central venous access for total parenteral nutrition administration results in an increased risk of infectious complications.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Curtas S. , Bonaventura M. , Meguid MM Cannulation of inferior vena cava for long term central venous access . Surg Gynecol Obstet 1989;168:121-4.

MoncriefJA Femoral catheters. Ann Surg 1958;147:166-72.

Bansmer G. , Keith D. , Tesluk H. Complications following use of indwelling catheters of inferior vena cava . JAMA 1958;167:1606-11.

O'Neill JA Jr , Pruitt BA Jr , Foley FD , et al. Suppurative thrombophlebitis: a lethal complication of intravenous therapy. J Trauma 1968;8:256-67.

Pruitt BA Jr , Stein JM , Foley FD , et al. Intravenous therapy in burn patients: suppurative thrombophlebitis and other life threatening complications . Arch Surg 1970;100:399-404.

Stein JM , Pruitt BA Jr. Suppurative thrombophlebitis: a lethal iatrogenic disease. N Engl J Med 1970;282:1452-5.

Pruitt BA Jr , McManus WF , Kim SH , et al. Diagnosis and treatment of cannula related intravenous sepsis in burn patients. Ann Surg 1980;191:546-54.

Maki DG , Weise CE , Sarafin HW A semiquantitative culture method for identifying intravenous catheter-related infection. N Engl J Med 1977;296:1305-9.

Lasala PA , Starker PM , Askanazi J. The saphenous system for long term parenteral nutrition. Crit Care Med 1983;11:378-80.

10.

Purdue GF , Hunt JL Vascular access through the femoral vessels: indications and complications . J Burn Care Rehabil 1986;7:498-500.

11.

Lazarus HM , Creger RJ , Bloom AD , et al. Percutaneous placement of femoral central venous catheters in patients undergoing transplantation of bone marrow. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1990;170:403-6.

12.

Murr MM , Rosenquist MD , Lewis RW , et al. A prospective safety study of femoral vein versus nonfemoral vein catheterization in patients with burns. J Burn Care Rehabil 1991;12:576-8.

13.

Williams JF , Seneff MG , Friedman BC , et al. Use of femoral venous catheters in critically ill adults: prospective study. Crit Care Med 1991;19:550-3.

14.

Friedman B. , Kanter G. , Titus D. Femoral venous catheters: a safe alternative for delivering parenteral alimentation. NCP 1994;9:69-72.

15.

Nidus BD , Speyer JL , Bottino J. , et al. Repeated femoral vein cannulation for administration of chemotherapeutic agents. Cancer Treat Rep 1983;67:185-7.