Muggia-Sullam M., Bower RH, Murphy RF, et al. Postoperative enteral versus parenteral nutritional support in gastrointestinal surgery . Am J Surg1985;149:106-12.
2.
Adams S., Dellinger EP, Wertz MJ, et al: Enteral versus parenteral nutritional support following laparotomy for trauma: a randomized prospective trial. J Trauma1986;26:882-91.
3.
Moore F., Moore EE, Jones TN, et al. TEN versus TPN following major abdominal trauma-reduced septic morbidity. J Trauma1989;29:916-23.
4.
Kudsk KA, Croce MA, Fabian TC, et al: Enteral versus parenteral feeding. Ann Surg1992;215:503-13.
5.
Lowry SFThe route of feeding influences injury responses. J Trauma1990;30:S10-S15.
6.
The Veterans Affairs Total Parenteral Nutrition Cooperative Study Group.Perioperative total parenteral nutrition in surgical patients. N Engl J Med1991;325:525-32.
7.
Cerra FB, McPherson JP, Konstantinides FN, et al. Enteral nutrition does not prevent multiple organ failure syndrome (MOFS) after sepsis. Surgery1988;104:727-33.
8.
Keyland DK, Cook DJ, Guyatt GHEnteral nutrition in the critically ill patient: a critical review of the evidence. Int Care Med1993;19:435-42.
9.
Fisher CJ, Slotman GJ, Opal SM, et al. Initial evaluation of human recombinant interleukin-1 receptor antagonist in the treatment of sepsis syndrome: a randomized, open-label, placebo-controlled trial. Crit Care Med1994 ;22:12-21.
10.
Fisher CJ, Dhainant JF, Opal SM, et al. Recombinant human interleukin 1 receptor antagonist in the treatment of patients with sepsis syndrome. JAMA1994 ;271:1836-43.
11.
Round table conference on metabolic support of the critically ill patients. Int Care Med1994;20:298-99.
